Media coverage of autism study leaves out critical context

printer friendlyprinter friendly

There has been a lot of media attention on a new study published in Pediatrics that links obesity during pregnancy to increased risk of autism. The researchers studied more than 1,000 children in California and found that the risk of autism was 60% higher among those born to mothers who were obese, hypertensive or diabetic during their pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorders appear to be on the rise in the United States, and research about the possible causes of this increase is vital. However, news coverage of this latest study is problematic because it frames autism as a problem that may primarily be the responsibility of mothers, giving little to no attention to the many social, cultural, and environmental factors that research has shown to contribute to obesity. For example, mothers cannot determine how many stores offer decently priced fresh foods. They cannot overpower the food and beverage industry that spends millions of dollars every hour marketing cheap fast foods and sugary beverages. They cannot single-handedly improve the safety of their neighborhoods to make them more walkable or conducive to physical activity.

Though most articles acknowledge the study's limits and caution against drawing premature conclusions about potential connections between obesity and autism, they nevertheless point to what pregnant women should be doing differently to lose weight. An LA Times article encourages diet and exercise in the first sentence, and NPR paraphrases a study author, saying, "[I]t's clearly a good idea for women who are overweight or obese to try to slim down before becoming pregnant."

This is not the first time that news coverage of a health issue has reinforced a "mother blaming" frame. For example, much coverage of breastfeeding, which has many known health benefits, tends to scold mothers who don't breastfeed rather than exploring the barriers in the workplace, hospital and other locations that make it hard for women to nurse.

Academics, professionals, and journalists who want to improve our public's health need to be critical of the contextual factors that influence it. Reporters -- and the advocates who talk with them -- should explain and illustrate the conditions that precede individual decision-making. By widening the lens, we will identify other institutions that are accountable, such as city councils or the food beverage industry, in the case of obesity, that can help provide healthier environments for mothers, children and all people alike.


health equity (10) Colorado (1) Berkeley (2) built environment (2) community organizing (1) indoor smoking ban (1) social media (2) Coca-Cola (3) Nickelodeon (1) cosmetics (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) obesity prevention (1) Merck (1) measure N (2) emergency contraception (1) campaign finance (1) beauty products (1) snap (1) SSBs (1) news (2) public health policy (2) sexual violence (2) diabetes prevention (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Chile (1) sandusky (2) tobacco industry (2) public health data (1) food deserts (1) political correctness (1) news analysis (3) violence (2) San Francisco (3) equity (3) soda industry (4) FCC (1) authentic voices (1) Let's Move (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) apha (3) Joe Paterno (1) nonprofit communications (1) SB 1000 (1) violence prevention (8) paula deen (1) elephant triggers (1) Measure O (1) values (1) prison phone calls (1) vaccines (1) soda (12) choice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) food industry (4) SB-5 (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) communication (2) collaboration (1) diabetes (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) cannes lions festival (1) news strategy (1) gender (1) HPV vaccine (1) autism (1) front groups (1) institutional accountability (1) Twitter (1) cancer prevention (1) advocacy (3) Black Lives Matter (1) Telluride (1) childhood adversity (1) childhood obesity (1) soda taxes (2) digital marketing (3) messaging (3) women's health (2) sexism (2) cigarette advertising (1) soda warning labels (1) tobacco control (2) El Monte (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) Sam Kass (1) gun violence (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) junk food marketing (4) Oglala Sioux (3) democracy (1) Bloomberg (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) Amanda Fallin (1) soda tax (11) election 2016 (1) McDonald's (1) white house (1) sanitation (1) language (6) Big Food (2) corporate social responsibility (1) sexual health (1) weight of the nation (1) food (1) news coverage (1) genital warts (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) gatorade bolt game (1) community safety (1) food marketing (5) default frame (1) childhood trauma (3) Gardasil (1) youth (1) tobacco tax (1) nanny state (2) filibuster (1) naacp (1) stigma (1) environmental health (1) social justice (2) world water day (1) SB 402 (1) safety (1) Whiteclay (4) Marion Nestle (1) communication strategy (1) obesity (10) Richmond (5) abortion (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Penn State (3) industry appeals to choice (1) product safety (1) prison system (1) chronic disease (2) framing (14) prevention (1) breastfeeding (3) suicide nets (1) race (1) mental health (2) Michelle Obama (1) racism (1) privilege (1) suicide barrier (2) Big Tobacco (3) Aurora (1) seat belt laws (1) Dora the Explorer (1) physical activity (1) food environment (1) Texas (1) media analysis (6) social math (1) gun control (2) cervical cancer (1) alcohol (5) target marketing (9) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Big Soda (2) public health (71) tobacco (5) media advocacy (23) marketing (1) Donald Trump (2) ACEs (2) Newtown (1) Happy Meals (1) cap the tap (1) cancer research (1) Tea Party (1) food justice (1) food access (1) healthy eating (1) junk food (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) Proposition 29 (1) ssb (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) paper tigers (1) sexual assault (1) PepsiCo (1) personal responsibility (3) social change (1) Proposition 47 (1) water security (1) Sandy Hook (2) child sexual abuse (5) Connecticut shooting (1) Bill Cosby (1) george lakoff (1) inequities (1) water (1) strategic communication (1) Rachel Grana (1) regulation (2) journalism (1) structural racism (1) community violence (1) media bites (1) summer camps (1) education (1) community health (1) Catholic church (1) suicide prevention (2) Wendy Davis (1) news monitoring (1) liana winett (1) food and beverage marketing (3) auto safety (1) food swamps (1) reproductive justice (1) sports drinks (1) california (1) new year's resolutions (1) sugary drinks (10) childhood obestiy conference (1) children's health (3) online marketing (1) community (1) government intrusion (1) beverage industry (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) American Beverage Association (1) health care (1) Citizens United (1) media (7)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: