Media coverage of autism study leaves out critical context

printer friendlyprinter friendly

There has been a lot of media attention on a new study published in Pediatrics that links obesity during pregnancy to increased risk of autism. The researchers studied more than 1,000 children in California and found that the risk of autism was 60% higher among those born to mothers who were obese, hypertensive or diabetic during their pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorders appear to be on the rise in the United States, and research about the possible causes of this increase is vital. However, news coverage of this latest study is problematic because it frames autism as a problem that may primarily be the responsibility of mothers, giving little to no attention to the many social, cultural, and environmental factors that research has shown to contribute to obesity. For example, mothers cannot determine how many stores offer decently priced fresh foods. They cannot overpower the food and beverage industry that spends millions of dollars every hour marketing cheap fast foods and sugary beverages. They cannot single-handedly improve the safety of their neighborhoods to make them more walkable or conducive to physical activity.

Though most articles acknowledge the study's limits and caution against drawing premature conclusions about potential connections between obesity and autism, they nevertheless point to what pregnant women should be doing differently to lose weight. An LA Times article encourages diet and exercise in the first sentence, and NPR paraphrases a study author, saying, "[I]t's clearly a good idea for women who are overweight or obese to try to slim down before becoming pregnant."

This is not the first time that news coverage of a health issue has reinforced a "mother blaming" frame. For example, much coverage of breastfeeding, which has many known health benefits, tends to scold mothers who don't breastfeed rather than exploring the barriers in the workplace, hospital and other locations that make it hard for women to nurse.

Academics, professionals, and journalists who want to improve our public's health need to be critical of the contextual factors that influence it. Reporters -- and the advocates who talk with them -- should explain and illustrate the conditions that precede individual decision-making. By widening the lens, we will identify other institutions that are accountable, such as city councils or the food beverage industry, in the case of obesity, that can help provide healthier environments for mothers, children and all people alike.


Bill Cosby (1) Richmond (5) diabetes prevention (1) industry appeals to choice (1) breastfeeding (3) strategic communication (1) snap (1) Proposition 47 (1) media analysis (6) cannes lions festival (1) race (1) news strategy (1) Wendy Davis (1) community violence (1) reproductive justice (1) children's health (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) apha (3) Let's Move (1) equity (3) language (6) food swamps (1) institutional accountability (1) news coverage (1) prison system (1) social media (2) education (1) democracy (1) Coca-Cola (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) physical activity (1) framing (14) elephant triggers (1) obesity prevention (1) privilege (1) gender (1) paula deen (1) Donald Trump (2) sexual violence (2) beverage industry (2) default frame (1) sexual health (1) food marketing (4) sexism (2) weight of the nation (1) abortion (1) paper tigers (1) measure N (2) social justice (2) sexual assault (1) journalism (1) SB 402 (1) chronic disease (2) SB-5 (1) environmental health (1) cancer research (1) indoor smoking ban (1) tobacco tax (1) youth (1) communication (2) ssb (1) social change (1) alcohol (5) inequities (1) gun violence (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Nickelodeon (1) American Beverage Association (1) junk food (2) Big Tobacco (3) Big Soda (2) soda taxes (2) political correctness (1) advocacy (3) Colorado (1) collaboration (1) cancer prevention (1) Gardasil (1) cervical cancer (1) Measure O (1) news monitoring (1) Joe Paterno (1) McDonald's (1) Texas (1) healthy eating (1) media advocacy (23) diabetes (1) mental health (2) nonprofit communications (1) news analysis (3) PepsiCo (1) childhood adversity (1) media (7) food (1) tobacco (5) health care (1) tobacco control (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) community health (1) structural racism (1) world water day (1) sports drinks (1) water security (1) naacp (1) community organizing (1) values (1) Whiteclay (4) soda tax (11) autism (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Proposition 29 (1) food deserts (1) Citizens United (1) white house (1) cigarette advertising (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) auto safety (1) liana winett (1) sanitation (1) government intrusion (1) online marketing (1) Merck (1) cap the tap (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) community safety (1) violence (2) new year's resolutions (1) Catholic church (1) soda industry (4) sugary drinks (10) choice (1) child sexual abuse (5) Michelle Obama (1) marketing (1) news (2) george lakoff (1) Sam Kass (1) HPV vaccine (1) seat belt laws (1) Chile (1) communication strategy (1) sandusky (2) Aurora (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Happy Meals (1) food justice (1) childhood trauma (3) tobacco industry (2) suicide nets (1) cosmetics (1) El Monte (3) corporate social responsibility (1) safety (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) built environment (2) summer camps (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) childhood obesity (1) food access (1) food industry (4) prevention (1) food environment (1) Penn State (3) soda warning labels (1) health equity (10) social math (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food and beverage marketing (3) front groups (1) regulation (2) Amanda Fallin (1) women's health (2) filibuster (1) election 2016 (1) Rachel Grana (1) violence prevention (8) beauty products (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) digital marketing (2) soda (12) Tea Party (1) target marketing (8) SB 1000 (1) Dora the Explorer (1) suicide barrier (2) stigma (1) public health data (1) Marion Nestle (1) Sandy Hook (2) Connecticut shooting (1) public health (70) gun control (2) messaging (3) Telluride (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) public health policy (2) authentic voices (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) vaccines (1) genital warts (1) Newtown (1) San Francisco (3) prison phone calls (1) product safety (1) junk food marketing (4) water (1) community (1) Oglala Sioux (3) california (1) campaign finance (1) racism (1) Black Lives Matter (1) emergency contraception (1) FCC (1) personal responsibility (3) ACEs (2) obesity (10) media bites (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) suicide prevention (2) SSBs (1) Big Food (2) Bloomberg (3) Berkeley (2) Twitter (1) nanny state (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: