Media coverage of autism study leaves out critical context

printer friendlyprinter friendly

There has been a lot of media attention on a new study published in Pediatrics that links obesity during pregnancy to increased risk of autism. The researchers studied more than 1,000 children in California and found that the risk of autism was 60% higher among those born to mothers who were obese, hypertensive or diabetic during their pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorders appear to be on the rise in the United States, and research about the possible causes of this increase is vital. However, news coverage of this latest study is problematic because it frames autism as a problem that may primarily be the responsibility of mothers, giving little to no attention to the many social, cultural, and environmental factors that research has shown to contribute to obesity. For example, mothers cannot determine how many stores offer decently priced fresh foods. They cannot overpower the food and beverage industry that spends millions of dollars every hour marketing cheap fast foods and sugary beverages. They cannot single-handedly improve the safety of their neighborhoods to make them more walkable or conducive to physical activity.

Though most articles acknowledge the study's limits and caution against drawing premature conclusions about potential connections between obesity and autism, they nevertheless point to what pregnant women should be doing differently to lose weight. An LA Times article encourages diet and exercise in the first sentence, and NPR paraphrases a study author, saying, "[I]t's clearly a good idea for women who are overweight or obese to try to slim down before becoming pregnant."

This is not the first time that news coverage of a health issue has reinforced a "mother blaming" frame. For example, much coverage of breastfeeding, which has many known health benefits, tends to scold mothers who don't breastfeed rather than exploring the barriers in the workplace, hospital and other locations that make it hard for women to nurse.

Academics, professionals, and journalists who want to improve our public's health need to be critical of the contextual factors that influence it. Reporters -- and the advocates who talk with them -- should explain and illustrate the conditions that precede individual decision-making. By widening the lens, we will identify other institutions that are accountable, such as city councils or the food beverage industry, in the case of obesity, that can help provide healthier environments for mothers, children and all people alike.


soda taxes (2) communication (2) healthy eating (1) naacp (1) Bloomberg (3) mental health (2) campaign finance (1) language (6) Jerry Sandusky (3) food justice (1) Michelle Obama (1) snap (1) community (1) community organizing (1) breastfeeding (3) Newtown (1) Sandy Hook (2) Sam Kass (1) digital marketing (3) alcohol (5) suicide prevention (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) social media (2) Big Tobacco (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) SB 402 (1) equity (3) values (1) stigma (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) education (1) institutional accountability (1) advocacy (3) inequities (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Marion Nestle (1) food access (1) safety (1) genital warts (1) california (1) Let's Move (1) Big Food (2) media advocacy (23) tobacco control (2) tobacco industry (2) Twitter (1) product safety (1) framing (14) PepsiCo (1) nanny state (2) paula deen (1) HPV vaccine (1) suicide barrier (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Joe Paterno (1) choice (1) Aurora (1) women's health (2) Colorado (1) environmental health (1) ssb (1) Texas (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) personal responsibility (3) childhood adversity (1) Rachel Grana (1) front groups (1) vaccines (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) sanitation (1) ACEs (2) sexism (2) junk food marketing (4) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sugary drinks (10) measure N (2) elephant triggers (1) online marketing (1) strategic communication (1) community safety (1) Measure O (1) tobacco (5) news coverage (1) soda tax (11) marketing (1) water (1) messaging (3) food marketing (5) industry appeals to choice (1) gun violence (1) Gardasil (1) structural racism (1) El Monte (3) media bites (1) apha (3) San Francisco (3) childhood trauma (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) sexual health (1) food environment (1) diabetes prevention (1) cigarette advertising (1) food and beverage marketing (3) soda industry (4) cosmetics (1) sexual violence (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) cap the tap (1) obesity prevention (1) Coca-Cola (3) cervical cancer (1) Wendy Davis (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) race (1) Penn State (3) Amanda Fallin (1) filibuster (1) violence (2) privilege (1) American Beverage Association (1) Tea Party (1) Telluride (1) Citizens United (1) george lakoff (1) political correctness (1) Oglala Sioux (3) SB 1000 (1) emergency contraception (1) government intrusion (1) Black Lives Matter (1) news analysis (3) auto safety (1) Nickelodeon (1) cancer prevention (1) abortion (1) cancer research (1) obesity (10) seat belt laws (1) social justice (2) prison system (1) sports drinks (1) suicide nets (1) Proposition 47 (1) Catholic church (1) children's health (3) SB-5 (1) physical activity (1) news strategy (1) water security (1) community health (1) Whiteclay (4) soda warning labels (1) social change (1) built environment (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Proposition 29 (1) Donald Trump (2) health care (1) Connecticut shooting (1) collaboration (1) default frame (1) gender (1) social math (1) gun control (2) Bill Cosby (1) diabetes (1) summer camps (1) new year's resolutions (1) health equity (10) public health data (1) youth (1) liana winett (1) Big Soda (2) cannes lions festival (1) Chile (1) regulation (2) gatorade bolt game (1) FCC (1) sexual assault (1) reproductive justice (1) journalism (1) prison phone calls (1) communication strategy (1) soda (12) beverage industry (2) food swamps (1) Merck (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Happy Meals (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) racism (1) childhood obesity (1) public health policy (2) indoor smoking ban (1) paper tigers (1) McDonald's (1) chronic disease (2) nonprofit communications (1) corporate social responsibility (1) authentic voices (1) beauty products (1) sandusky (2) media analysis (6) child sexual abuse (5) target marketing (9) prevention (1) media (7) public health (71) news (2) junk food (2) food deserts (1) community violence (1) democracy (1) tobacco tax (1) weight of the nation (1) food industry (4) Berkeley (2) white house (1) food (1) election 2016 (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) violence prevention (8) SSBs (1) Richmond (5) news monitoring (1) world water day (1) autism (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: