Media coverage of autism study leaves out critical context

printer friendlyprinter friendly

There has been a lot of media attention on a new study published in Pediatrics that links obesity during pregnancy to increased risk of autism. The researchers studied more than 1,000 children in California and found that the risk of autism was 60% higher among those born to mothers who were obese, hypertensive or diabetic during their pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorders appear to be on the rise in the United States, and research about the possible causes of this increase is vital. However, news coverage of this latest study is problematic because it frames autism as a problem that may primarily be the responsibility of mothers, giving little to no attention to the many social, cultural, and environmental factors that research has shown to contribute to obesity. For example, mothers cannot determine how many stores offer decently priced fresh foods. They cannot overpower the food and beverage industry that spends millions of dollars every hour marketing cheap fast foods and sugary beverages. They cannot single-handedly improve the safety of their neighborhoods to make them more walkable or conducive to physical activity.

Though most articles acknowledge the study's limits and caution against drawing premature conclusions about potential connections between obesity and autism, they nevertheless point to what pregnant women should be doing differently to lose weight. An LA Times article encourages diet and exercise in the first sentence, and NPR paraphrases a study author, saying, "[I]t's clearly a good idea for women who are overweight or obese to try to slim down before becoming pregnant."

This is not the first time that news coverage of a health issue has reinforced a "mother blaming" frame. For example, much coverage of breastfeeding, which has many known health benefits, tends to scold mothers who don't breastfeed rather than exploring the barriers in the workplace, hospital and other locations that make it hard for women to nurse.

Academics, professionals, and journalists who want to improve our public's health need to be critical of the contextual factors that influence it. Reporters -- and the advocates who talk with them -- should explain and illustrate the conditions that precede individual decision-making. By widening the lens, we will identify other institutions that are accountable, such as city councils or the food beverage industry, in the case of obesity, that can help provide healthier environments for mothers, children and all people alike.


Pine Ridge reservation (1) children's health (3) childhood trauma (3) advocacy (3) Wendy Davis (1) Sam Kass (1) news coverage (1) new year's resolutions (1) political correctness (1) cannes lions festival (1) regulation (2) HPV vaccine (1) prison phone calls (1) genital warts (1) Bill Cosby (1) media advocacy (23) alcohol (5) messaging (3) privilege (1) election 2016 (1) mental health (2) food marketing (5) Connecticut shooting (1) naacp (1) suicide prevention (2) community (1) obesity (10) sandusky (2) race (1) healthy eating (1) communication (2) Measure O (1) water (1) social math (1) product safety (1) gun control (2) default frame (1) community health (1) SSBs (1) community safety (1) equity (3) cosmetics (1) youth (1) institutional accountability (1) personal responsibility (3) structural racism (1) gun violence (1) Citizens United (1) Coca-Cola (3) community violence (1) gender (1) public health (71) front groups (1) food access (1) paula deen (1) violence (2) Big Soda (2) industry appeals to choice (1) choice (1) food justice (1) Michelle Obama (1) chronic disease (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) Proposition 29 (1) Black Lives Matter (1) framing (14) built environment (2) cancer prevention (1) ssb (1) elephant triggers (1) Aurora (1) media (7) San Francisco (3) sexual health (1) snap (1) marketing (1) news (2) summer camps (1) liana winett (1) news strategy (1) media bites (1) tobacco industry (2) Tea Party (1) Oglala Sioux (3) vaccines (1) Big Food (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) white house (1) Dora the Explorer (1) social justice (2) Donald Trump (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) Big Tobacco (3) prevention (1) soda taxes (2) Marion Nestle (1) SB 402 (1) food swamps (1) Let's Move (1) soda warning labels (1) gatorade bolt game (1) obesity prevention (1) junk food (2) diabetes (1) prison system (1) soda tax (11) soda (12) news monitoring (1) social media (2) El Monte (3) community organizing (1) cancer research (1) Joe Paterno (1) apha (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) paper tigers (1) tobacco control (2) government intrusion (1) food (1) Gardasil (1) food deserts (1) beauty products (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) sports drinks (1) suicide nets (1) environmental health (1) PepsiCo (1) public health data (1) communication strategy (1) Catholic church (1) news analysis (3) breastfeeding (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) online marketing (1) Texas (1) food industry (4) SB-5 (1) abortion (1) sexual violence (2) junk food marketing (4) Richmond (5) language (6) food and beverage marketing (3) racism (1) indoor smoking ban (1) diabetes prevention (1) Bloomberg (3) childhood obesity (1) soda industry (4) physical activity (1) American Beverage Association (1) democracy (1) target marketing (9) Berkeley (2) Colorado (1) nanny state (2) media analysis (6) Johnson & Johnson (1) social change (1) SB 1000 (1) california (1) auto safety (1) public health policy (2) Chile (1) george lakoff (1) McDonald's (1) sanitation (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) child sexual abuse (5) FCC (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Whiteclay (4) measure N (2) suicide barrier (2) Sandy Hook (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) water security (1) campaign finance (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) cervical cancer (1) Happy Meals (1) authentic voices (1) violence prevention (8) tobacco tax (1) Proposition 47 (1) stigma (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Nickelodeon (1) emergency contraception (1) Telluride (1) world water day (1) strategic communication (1) safety (1) Twitter (1) sexism (2) digital marketing (3) sugary drinks (10) Merck (1) childhood adversity (1) education (1) ACEs (2) corporate social responsibility (1) cigarette advertising (1) Newtown (1) autism (1) reproductive justice (1) beverage industry (2) cap the tap (1) Amanda Fallin (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) sexual assault (1) seat belt laws (1) women's health (2) health equity (10) journalism (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) health care (1) collaboration (1) Rachel Grana (1) values (1) Penn State (3) tobacco (5) inequities (1) filibuster (1) weight of the nation (1) nonprofit communications (1) food environment (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: