Advocates bulking up for the next battle with Big Soda

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the aftermath of two failed measures that would have taxed sugar-sweetened beverages at a penny-per-ounce, the beverage industry has been flexing its muscles and kicking sand in the faces of soda tax proponents.

Just like those old comic book ads in which a scrawny man and his girlfriend are lounging by the seashore when a big muscular guy comes over to bully them, Big Beverage poured $3.7 million to defeat soda tax measures in Richmond and El Monte in southern California. In Richmond alone, the beverage industry outspent supporters by 35 to 1. In all, Big Soda spent $115 per vote.

But, just like the ad for famed bodybuilder Charles Atlas' muscle-building program, being pushed around on the beach only motivated scrawny guy to bulk up so he could come back and defeat muscle man once and for all.

It's that bodybuilder-scrawny man dynamic that pushed Richmond resident Jenny Wang over the edge.

"The thing that affected me most was that here we were a small grassroots group fighting multi-billion dollar corporations," said Wang. "That stark contrast made me more passionate. I developed such a disdain for these large corporations essentially buying this election."

Wang, a public health professional who works in Oakland, became interested in the Richmond tax proposal after hearing about it from fellow residents.

"I was already convinced taxing sugar-sweetened beverages was a good idea, but I was just confused about (Measure N) and where the money would go. After I learned that it would be used to support programs aimed at fighting the obesity epidemic that soda has been such a major cause of, I was immediately on board," recalled Wang.

Richmond's Measure O, which passed but was made moot by the defeat of its companion Measure N, would have advised the city to use the tax proceeds, estimated to be around $3 million annually, on after-school activity programs, parks, diabetes education and other programs to fight childhood obesity. A measure in El Monte in southern California that was similar to Measure N lost 77 to 23.

"We lost the election, but the movement will eventually win," Dr. Jeff Ritterman told the San Francisco Chronicle. Ritterman is the Richmond city councilman who sponsored the tax proposal.

The newspaper quoted Berkeley City Councilwoman Linda Maio as saying: "Are we daunted by what happened in Richmond? Not at all. Not one bit."

Others were also quoted, including a Half Moon Bay resident who, inspired by Richmond, is lobbying San Mateo County officials to move ahead with a soda tax.

Ritterman has announced a new goal to see 14 California cities put forth soda tax proposals by 2014, with the idea that this flurry of measures would stretch the beverage industry's resources so thin that this might allow a few of the ballot proposals to pass.

For Wang, the fight against Big Soda is personal.

"I come from a low-income family of savers and coupon clippers. I can't get my family to not buy soda when it's on sale. When you can buy a 2-liter bottle of soda for 99 cents, or get a 12-pack of soda free when you buy the first pack, you're going to buy the soda over the bottled water," said Wang. "I have aunts and uncles with diabetes. It's hurting my family. It's hurting me."

Although Ritterman and soda tax supporters like Wang were understandably disappointed by the losses, they are bolstered by the lessons learned in the soda tax campaigns -- not least that money buys votes, as noted nutrition and public policy expert Marion Nestle pointed out in a recent San Francisco Chronicle editorial.

"But it also taught (us) that appeals to voter concerns about higher prices, job losses and personal autonomy are more effective than appeals based solely on health considerations," Nestle told the Chronicle.

Wang agreed, and has taken such lessons to heart for the next go-round.

"We framed the health message. (Big Soda) framed the cost message, saying that it would hike up the cost of buying groceries and hit low-income people the hardest. We should borrow that frame," said Wang. "The health costs of obesity is coming out of your pocket. That's the bottom line."


Pine Ridge reservation (1) American Beverage Association (1) elephant triggers (1) messaging (2) Rachel Grana (1) health care (1) reproductive justice (1) environmental health (1) Newtown (1) junk food (1) sandusky (2) youth (1) children's health (3) tobacco (4) cap the tap (1) gun control (2) Bloomberg (3) Big Food (2) beverage industry (1) prevention (1) breastfeeding (3) violence (1) online marketing (1) sexual assault (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Tea Party (1) sexism (1) food and beverage marketing (3) water (1) tobacco control (2) PepsiCo (1) violence prevention (6) Oakland Unified School District (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) apha (1) front groups (1) Let's Move (1) Telluride (1) framing (9) McDonald's (1) food justice (1) Coca-Cola (3) Connecticut shooting (1) SB-5 (1) autism (1) sanitation (1) Oglala Sioux (3) cancer research (1) choice (1) Whiteclay (4) vaccines (1) world water day (1) marketing (1) Bill Cosby (1) liana winett (1) SB 402 (1) health equity (9) diabetes (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) white house (1) prison system (1) Marion Nestle (1) measure N (2) public health (55) food (1) child sexual abuse (5) Measure O (1) Citizens United (1) cigarette advertising (1) structural racism (1) genital warts (1) food deserts (1) target marketing (5) Golden Gate Bridge (2) collaboration (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Texas (1) corporate social responsibility (1) San Francisco (3) Joe Paterno (1) beauty products (1) gender (1) Michelle Obama (1) communication (2) filibuster (1) media advocacy (15) soda warning labels (1) media analysis (2) water security (1) Amanda Fallin (1) social media (1) Sam Kass (1) public health policy (1) inequities (1) cosmetics (1) prison phone calls (1) paula deen (1) food marketing (3) new year's resolutions (1) media (4) george lakoff (1) tobacco industry (2) abortion (1) suicide nets (1) ssb (1) Gardasil (1) chronic disease (2) sports drinks (1) Big Tobacco (3) suicide barrier (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) regulation (2) advocacy (3) Aurora (1) seat belt laws (1) gun violence (1) FCC (1) news coverage (1) HPV vaccine (1) SB 1000 (1) Wendy Davis (1) food environment (1) SSBs (1) mental health (2) Colorado (1) sexual violence (1) childhood obesity (1) soda tax (10) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) race (1) Penn State (3) sugary drinks (6) weight of the nation (1) california (1) language (6) Proposition 29 (1) tobacco tax (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) indoor smoking ban (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Richmond (5) food swamps (1) Happy Meals (1) product safety (1) auto safety (1) campaign finance (1) El Monte (3) built environment (2) soda (12) sexual health (1) Chile (1) social justice (1) snap (1) obesity prevention (1) equity (3) Nickelodeon (1) summer camps (1) food industry (2) values (1) suicide prevention (2) cancer prevention (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Berkeley (2) institutional accountability (1) Dora the Explorer (1) obesity (9) junk food marketing (3) alcohol (4) women's health (2) naacp (1) healthy eating (1) social change (1) community health (1) Merck (1) food access (1) media bites (1) privilege (1) news strategy (1) stigma (1) soda industry (4) cervical cancer (1) Big Soda (2) nanny state (2) Sandy Hook (2) Catholic church (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) digital marketing (2) physical activity (1) government intrusion (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) personal responsibility (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: