Advocates bulking up for the next battle with Big Soda

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the aftermath of two failed measures that would have taxed sugar-sweetened beverages at a penny-per-ounce, the beverage industry has been flexing its muscles and kicking sand in the faces of soda tax proponents.

Just like those old comic book ads in which a scrawny man and his girlfriend are lounging by the seashore when a big muscular guy comes over to bully them, Big Beverage poured $3.7 million to defeat soda tax measures in Richmond and El Monte in southern California. In Richmond alone, the beverage industry outspent supporters by 35 to 1. In all, Big Soda spent $115 per vote.

But, just like the ad for famed bodybuilder Charles Atlas' muscle-building program, being pushed around on the beach only motivated scrawny guy to bulk up so he could come back and defeat muscle man once and for all.

It's that bodybuilder-scrawny man dynamic that pushed Richmond resident Jenny Wang over the edge.

"The thing that affected me most was that here we were a small grassroots group fighting multi-billion dollar corporations," said Wang. "That stark contrast made me more passionate. I developed such a disdain for these large corporations essentially buying this election."

Wang, a public health professional who works in Oakland, became interested in the Richmond tax proposal after hearing about it from fellow residents.

"I was already convinced taxing sugar-sweetened beverages was a good idea, but I was just confused about (Measure N) and where the money would go. After I learned that it would be used to support programs aimed at fighting the obesity epidemic that soda has been such a major cause of, I was immediately on board," recalled Wang.

Richmond's Measure O, which passed but was made moot by the defeat of its companion Measure N, would have advised the city to use the tax proceeds, estimated to be around $3 million annually, on after-school activity programs, parks, diabetes education and other programs to fight childhood obesity. A measure in El Monte in southern California that was similar to Measure N lost 77 to 23.

"We lost the election, but the movement will eventually win," Dr. Jeff Ritterman told the San Francisco Chronicle. Ritterman is the Richmond city councilman who sponsored the tax proposal.

The newspaper quoted Berkeley City Councilwoman Linda Maio as saying: "Are we daunted by what happened in Richmond? Not at all. Not one bit."

Others were also quoted, including a Half Moon Bay resident who, inspired by Richmond, is lobbying San Mateo County officials to move ahead with a soda tax.

Ritterman has announced a new goal to see 14 California cities put forth soda tax proposals by 2014, with the idea that this flurry of measures would stretch the beverage industry's resources so thin that this might allow a few of the ballot proposals to pass.

For Wang, the fight against Big Soda is personal.

"I come from a low-income family of savers and coupon clippers. I can't get my family to not buy soda when it's on sale. When you can buy a 2-liter bottle of soda for 99 cents, or get a 12-pack of soda free when you buy the first pack, you're going to buy the soda over the bottled water," said Wang. "I have aunts and uncles with diabetes. It's hurting my family. It's hurting me."

Although Ritterman and soda tax supporters like Wang were understandably disappointed by the losses, they are bolstered by the lessons learned in the soda tax campaigns -- not least that money buys votes, as noted nutrition and public policy expert Marion Nestle pointed out in a recent San Francisco Chronicle editorial.

"But it also taught (us) that appeals to voter concerns about higher prices, job losses and personal autonomy are more effective than appeals based solely on health considerations," Nestle told the Chronicle.

Wang agreed, and has taken such lessons to heart for the next go-round.

"We framed the health message. (Big Soda) framed the cost message, saying that it would hike up the cost of buying groceries and hit low-income people the hardest. We should borrow that frame," said Wang. "The health costs of obesity is coming out of your pocket. That's the bottom line."

industry appeals to choice (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) summer camps (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) soda taxes (2) media advocacy (23) social justice (2) health care (1) Michelle Obama (1) framing (14) breastfeeding (3) tobacco industry (2) beverage industry (2) prison phone calls (1) Dora the Explorer (1) tobacco (5) Amanda Fallin (1) obesity prevention (1) physical activity (1) news (2) advocacy (3) new year's resolutions (1) journalism (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) sandusky (2) Big Food (2) paper tigers (1) regulation (2) healthy eating (1) Merck (1) water (1) seat belt laws (1) george lakoff (1) American Beverage Association (1) cap the tap (1) Let's Move (1) food environment (1) Berkeley (2) soda warning labels (1) product safety (1) Gardasil (1) reproductive justice (1) food deserts (1) food marketing (4) filibuster (1) Coca-Cola (3) education (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sanitation (1) Whiteclay (4) nonprofit communications (1) race (1) weight of the nation (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) food and beverage marketing (3) target marketing (8) news coverage (1) measure N (2) social media (2) Nickelodeon (1) communication strategy (1) beauty products (1) junk food (2) ACEs (2) Tea Party (1) authentic voices (1) cervical cancer (1) personal responsibility (3) food access (1) SSBs (1) social change (1) front groups (1) food justice (1) nanny state (2) public health policy (2) community (1) media bites (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Measure O (1) news monitoring (1) elephant triggers (1) structural racism (1) gun violence (1) childhood trauma (3) suicide prevention (2) food swamps (1) Big Tobacco (3) soda (12) Sam Kass (1) cancer research (1) diabetes (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) news strategy (1) children's health (3) Twitter (1) stigma (1) privilege (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) HPV vaccine (1) abortion (1) junk food marketing (4) Sandy Hook (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) social math (1) vaccines (1) collaboration (1) cigarette advertising (1) snap (1) tobacco tax (1) corporate social responsibility (1) default frame (1) Texas (1) sexual violence (2) soda industry (4) equity (3) Donald Trump (2) San Francisco (3) suicide nets (1) political correctness (1) cancer prevention (1) McDonald's (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) gun control (2) Telluride (1) sexual assault (1) sports drinks (1) Newtown (1) Joe Paterno (1) built environment (2) Proposition 29 (1) Catholic church (1) naacp (1) childhood adversity (1) choice (1) sugary drinks (10) sexual health (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) SB 402 (1) digital marketing (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) SB-5 (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) values (1) news analysis (3) FCC (1) youth (1) institutional accountability (1) democracy (1) racism (1) Bill Cosby (1) childhood obesity (1) community violence (1) safety (1) Happy Meals (1) public health (70) cannes lions festival (1) auto safety (1) suicide barrier (2) apha (3) liana winett (1) gender (1) food industry (4) government intrusion (1) prison system (1) genital warts (1) obesity (10) online marketing (1) Marion Nestle (1) child sexual abuse (5) sexism (2) PepsiCo (1) inequities (1) tobacco control (2) water security (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) media (7) strategic communication (1) Rachel Grana (1) violence (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Colorado (1) campaign finance (1) media analysis (6) world water day (1) community health (1) environmental health (1) chronic disease (2) SB 1000 (1) autism (1) community organizing (1) Oglala Sioux (3) communication (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) Proposition 47 (1) emergency contraception (1) food (1) california (1) community safety (1) gatorade bolt game (1) white house (1) Richmond (5) diabetes prevention (1) public health data (1) Penn State (3) paula deen (1) cosmetics (1) marketing (1) prevention (1) women's health (2) soda tax (11) Aurora (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) ssb (1) violence prevention (8) Citizens United (1) Big Soda (2) mental health (2) El Monte (3) Black Lives Matter (1) Bloomberg (3) Wendy Davis (1) language (6) Chile (1) health equity (10) messaging (3) alcohol (5) election 2016 (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: