Advocates bulking up for the next battle with Big Soda

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the aftermath of two failed measures that would have taxed sugar-sweetened beverages at a penny-per-ounce, the beverage industry has been flexing its muscles and kicking sand in the faces of soda tax proponents.

Just like those old comic book ads in which a scrawny man and his girlfriend are lounging by the seashore when a big muscular guy comes over to bully them, Big Beverage poured $3.7 million to defeat soda tax measures in Richmond and El Monte in southern California. In Richmond alone, the beverage industry outspent supporters by 35 to 1. In all, Big Soda spent $115 per vote.

But, just like the ad for famed bodybuilder Charles Atlas' muscle-building program, being pushed around on the beach only motivated scrawny guy to bulk up so he could come back and defeat muscle man once and for all.

It's that bodybuilder-scrawny man dynamic that pushed Richmond resident Jenny Wang over the edge.

"The thing that affected me most was that here we were a small grassroots group fighting multi-billion dollar corporations," said Wang. "That stark contrast made me more passionate. I developed such a disdain for these large corporations essentially buying this election."

Wang, a public health professional who works in Oakland, became interested in the Richmond tax proposal after hearing about it from fellow residents.

"I was already convinced taxing sugar-sweetened beverages was a good idea, but I was just confused about (Measure N) and where the money would go. After I learned that it would be used to support programs aimed at fighting the obesity epidemic that soda has been such a major cause of, I was immediately on board," recalled Wang.

Richmond's Measure O, which passed but was made moot by the defeat of its companion Measure N, would have advised the city to use the tax proceeds, estimated to be around $3 million annually, on after-school activity programs, parks, diabetes education and other programs to fight childhood obesity. A measure in El Monte in southern California that was similar to Measure N lost 77 to 23.

"We lost the election, but the movement will eventually win," Dr. Jeff Ritterman told the San Francisco Chronicle. Ritterman is the Richmond city councilman who sponsored the tax proposal.

The newspaper quoted Berkeley City Councilwoman Linda Maio as saying: "Are we daunted by what happened in Richmond? Not at all. Not one bit."

Others were also quoted, including a Half Moon Bay resident who, inspired by Richmond, is lobbying San Mateo County officials to move ahead with a soda tax.

Ritterman has announced a new goal to see 14 California cities put forth soda tax proposals by 2014, with the idea that this flurry of measures would stretch the beverage industry's resources so thin that this might allow a few of the ballot proposals to pass.

For Wang, the fight against Big Soda is personal.

"I come from a low-income family of savers and coupon clippers. I can't get my family to not buy soda when it's on sale. When you can buy a 2-liter bottle of soda for 99 cents, or get a 12-pack of soda free when you buy the first pack, you're going to buy the soda over the bottled water," said Wang. "I have aunts and uncles with diabetes. It's hurting my family. It's hurting me."

Although Ritterman and soda tax supporters like Wang were understandably disappointed by the losses, they are bolstered by the lessons learned in the soda tax campaigns -- not least that money buys votes, as noted nutrition and public policy expert Marion Nestle pointed out in a recent San Francisco Chronicle editorial.

"But it also taught (us) that appeals to voter concerns about higher prices, job losses and personal autonomy are more effective than appeals based solely on health considerations," Nestle told the Chronicle.

Wang agreed, and has taken such lessons to heart for the next go-round.

"We framed the health message. (Big Soda) framed the cost message, saying that it would hike up the cost of buying groceries and hit low-income people the hardest. We should borrow that frame," said Wang. "The health costs of obesity is coming out of your pocket. That's the bottom line."


Food Marketing Workgroup (1) seat belt laws (1) gender (1) junk food (1) food deserts (1) Richmond (4) water (1) gun violence (1) food marketing (3) PepsiCo (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Berkeley (1) sexism (1) Aurora (1) naacp (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Marion Nestle (1) healthy eating (1) physical activity (1) Sandy Hook (2) Bloomberg (3) beverage industry (1) snap (1) soda tax (9) Big Food (2) Chile (1) media (3) filibuster (1) online marketing (1) tobacco (4) Twitter for advocacy (1) Penn State (3) Proposition 29 (1) digital marketing (2) liana winett (1) cervical cancer (1) paula deen (1) public health policy (1) American Beverage Association (1) sports drinks (1) weight of the nation (1) gun control (2) sandusky (2) mental health (2) regulation (2) Measure O (1) alcohol (4) tobacco industry (2) cancer prevention (1) media analysis (1) SB 402 (1) Newtown (1) Whiteclay (4) Colorado (1) vaccines (1) corporate social responsibility (1) apha (1) product safety (1) suicide nets (1) social justice (1) Sam Kass (1) SB-5 (1) world water day (1) Citizens United (1) food environment (1) suicide prevention (2) privilege (1) Gardasil (1) equity (3) Texas (1) reproductive justice (1) news strategy (1) tobacco control (2) Catholic church (1) elephant triggers (1) tobacco tax (1) Big Soda (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) cancer research (1) Merck (1) messaging (2) Michelle Obama (1) abortion (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Coca-Cola (3) cigarette advertising (1) soda warning labels (1) breastfeeding (3) sanitation (1) community health (1) sugary drinks (6) SSBs (1) McDonald's (1) child sexual abuse (5) institutional accountability (1) communication (2) choice (1) FCC (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) media advocacy (13) autism (1) campaign finance (1) stigma (1) california (1) prison phone calls (1) public health (53) structural racism (1) water security (1) framing (9) Connecticut shooting (1) Tea Party (1) Let's Move (1) childhood obesity (1) obesity (9) prison system (1) health equity (9) childhood lead poisoning (1) marketing (1) El Monte (2) Happy Meals (1) women's health (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Rachel Grana (1) media bites (1) personal responsibility (2) nanny state (2) collaboration (1) Big Tobacco (3) health care (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) soda industry (4) San Francisco (2) environmental health (1) food and beverage marketing (3) food swamps (1) cap the tap (1) junk food marketing (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) auto safety (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) food (1) violence prevention (6) built environment (2) sexual health (1) Joe Paterno (1) ssb (1) social change (1) target marketing (5) diabetes (1) measure N (2) advocacy (3) government intrusion (1) soda (12) HPV vaccine (1) genital warts (1) gatorade bolt game (1) obesity prevention (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) cosmetics (1) food industry (2) industry appeals to choice (1) suicide barrier (2) food access (1) chronic disease (2) new year's resolutions (1) Nickelodeon (1) george lakoff (1) inequities (1) food justice (1) SB 1000 (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) front groups (1) Wendy Davis (1) prevention (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) children's health (3) summer camps (1) language (6) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) social media (1) values (1) beauty products (1) white house (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: