Advocates bulking up for the next battle with Big Soda

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the aftermath of two failed measures that would have taxed sugar-sweetened beverages at a penny-per-ounce, the beverage industry has been flexing its muscles and kicking sand in the faces of soda tax proponents.

Just like those old comic book ads in which a scrawny man and his girlfriend are lounging by the seashore when a big muscular guy comes over to bully them, Big Beverage poured $3.7 million to defeat soda tax measures in Richmond and El Monte in southern California. In Richmond alone, the beverage industry outspent supporters by 35 to 1. In all, Big Soda spent $115 per vote.

But, just like the ad for famed bodybuilder Charles Atlas' muscle-building program, being pushed around on the beach only motivated scrawny guy to bulk up so he could come back and defeat muscle man once and for all.

It's that bodybuilder-scrawny man dynamic that pushed Richmond resident Jenny Wang over the edge.

"The thing that affected me most was that here we were a small grassroots group fighting multi-billion dollar corporations," said Wang. "That stark contrast made me more passionate. I developed such a disdain for these large corporations essentially buying this election."

Wang, a public health professional who works in Oakland, became interested in the Richmond tax proposal after hearing about it from fellow residents.

"I was already convinced taxing sugar-sweetened beverages was a good idea, but I was just confused about (Measure N) and where the money would go. After I learned that it would be used to support programs aimed at fighting the obesity epidemic that soda has been such a major cause of, I was immediately on board," recalled Wang.

Richmond's Measure O, which passed but was made moot by the defeat of its companion Measure N, would have advised the city to use the tax proceeds, estimated to be around $3 million annually, on after-school activity programs, parks, diabetes education and other programs to fight childhood obesity. A measure in El Monte in southern California that was similar to Measure N lost 77 to 23.

"We lost the election, but the movement will eventually win," Dr. Jeff Ritterman told the San Francisco Chronicle. Ritterman is the Richmond city councilman who sponsored the tax proposal.

The newspaper quoted Berkeley City Councilwoman Linda Maio as saying: "Are we daunted by what happened in Richmond? Not at all. Not one bit."

Others were also quoted, including a Half Moon Bay resident who, inspired by Richmond, is lobbying San Mateo County officials to move ahead with a soda tax.

Ritterman has announced a new goal to see 14 California cities put forth soda tax proposals by 2014, with the idea that this flurry of measures would stretch the beverage industry's resources so thin that this might allow a few of the ballot proposals to pass.

For Wang, the fight against Big Soda is personal.

"I come from a low-income family of savers and coupon clippers. I can't get my family to not buy soda when it's on sale. When you can buy a 2-liter bottle of soda for 99 cents, or get a 12-pack of soda free when you buy the first pack, you're going to buy the soda over the bottled water," said Wang. "I have aunts and uncles with diabetes. It's hurting my family. It's hurting me."

Although Ritterman and soda tax supporters like Wang were understandably disappointed by the losses, they are bolstered by the lessons learned in the soda tax campaigns -- not least that money buys votes, as noted nutrition and public policy expert Marion Nestle pointed out in a recent San Francisco Chronicle editorial.

"But it also taught (us) that appeals to voter concerns about higher prices, job losses and personal autonomy are more effective than appeals based solely on health considerations," Nestle told the Chronicle.

Wang agreed, and has taken such lessons to heart for the next go-round.

"We framed the health message. (Big Soda) framed the cost message, saying that it would hike up the cost of buying groceries and hit low-income people the hardest. We should borrow that frame," said Wang. "The health costs of obesity is coming out of your pocket. That's the bottom line."


marketing (1) social math (1) gender (1) paula deen (1) Citizens United (1) auto safety (1) soda industry (4) Amanda Fallin (1) digital marketing (2) water (1) Nickelodeon (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) chronic disease (2) media analysis (3) ssb (1) language (6) mental health (2) adverse childhood experiences (1) Catholic church (1) Joe Paterno (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) breastfeeding (3) food justice (1) Gardasil (1) SB 1000 (1) default frame (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) personal responsibility (3) government intrusion (1) food marketing (3) public health data (1) Let's Move (1) race (1) sexism (1) beauty products (1) Chile (1) McDonald's (1) Aurora (1) naacp (1) obesity prevention (1) suicide barrier (2) SB 402 (1) Marion Nestle (1) campaign finance (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) junk food marketing (3) Michelle Obama (1) public health policy (2) Rachel Grana (1) gun violence (1) Happy Meals (1) health care (1) news analysis (1) equity (3) cancer research (1) Twitter (1) front groups (1) Texas (1) SB-5 (1) sexual violence (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) seat belt laws (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) regulation (2) genital warts (1) california (1) communication (2) Richmond (5) Bill Cosby (1) built environment (2) child sexual abuse (5) weight of the nation (1) junk food (2) snap (1) Penn State (3) soda warning labels (1) San Francisco (3) social media (2) prison phone calls (1) ACEs (1) cancer prevention (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) product safety (1) FCC (1) Measure O (1) sandusky (2) industry appeals to choice (1) Proposition 29 (1) online marketing (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Big Food (2) george lakoff (1) abortion (1) new year's resolutions (1) social change (1) sexual health (1) HPV vaccine (1) emergency contraception (1) youth (1) suicide nets (1) childhood trauma (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) social justice (1) Wendy Davis (1) American Beverage Association (1) alcohol (4) Telluride (1) food environment (1) Bloomberg (3) nanny state (2) soda tax (11) reproductive justice (1) children's health (3) health equity (9) sugary drinks (9) violence (1) institutional accountability (1) food industry (2) target marketing (7) autism (1) stigma (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) violence prevention (6) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Big Soda (2) environmental health (1) corporate social responsibility (1) physical activity (1) Colorado (1) values (1) cervical cancer (1) summer camps (1) gun control (2) PepsiCo (1) Merck (1) news strategy (1) SSBs (1) sexual assault (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) healthy eating (1) childhood adversity (1) public health (58) elephant triggers (1) filibuster (1) apha (1) sports drinks (1) tobacco (4) Sam Kass (1) diabetes prevention (1) tobacco control (2) Big Tobacco (3) liana winett (1) privilege (1) media bites (1) choice (1) news coverage (1) advocacy (3) community health (1) diabetes (1) Coca-Cola (3) media (4) inequities (1) Oglala Sioux (3) media advocacy (18) suicide prevention (2) Connecticut shooting (1) cigarette advertising (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) food deserts (1) sanitation (1) food swamps (1) vaccines (1) women's health (2) structural racism (1) El Monte (3) measure N (2) beverage industry (1) Newtown (1) Whiteclay (4) indoor smoking ban (1) white house (1) soda (12) tobacco industry (2) Sandy Hook (2) collaboration (1) cosmetics (1) food (1) prison system (1) water security (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Tea Party (1) cap the tap (1) childhood obesity (1) food access (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) prevention (1) world water day (1) obesity (9) framing (11) messaging (3) tobacco tax (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Berkeley (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: