McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) suicide prevention (2) sanitation (1) Aurora (1) FCC (1) community (1) advocacy (3) values (1) water security (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) regulation (2) soda taxes (2) Richmond (5) inequities (1) journalism (1) liana winett (1) ssb (1) messaging (3) tobacco industry (2) food access (1) environmental health (1) soda (12) cancer prevention (1) Gardasil (1) sexual violence (2) indoor smoking ban (1) paula deen (1) cosmetics (1) tobacco tax (1) soda industry (4) filibuster (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) breastfeeding (3) sugary drinks (10) racism (1) Donald Trump (2) tobacco (5) george lakoff (1) political correctness (1) community health (1) Big Soda (2) childhood trauma (3) tobacco control (2) sports drinks (1) suicide nets (1) obesity (10) cancer research (1) default frame (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) media bites (1) elephant triggers (1) news monitoring (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Wendy Davis (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) sexism (2) soda warning labels (1) news analysis (3) beverage industry (2) news (2) media advocacy (21) sexual health (1) SSBs (1) Chile (1) Big Food (2) weight of the nation (1) violence prevention (8) authentic voices (1) suicide barrier (2) food (1) Catholic church (1) Oglala Sioux (3) world water day (1) safety (1) Nickelodeon (1) chronic disease (2) food deserts (1) diabetes prevention (1) institutional accountability (1) childhood obesity (1) childhood adversity (1) white house (1) paper tigers (1) Measure O (1) Bill Cosby (1) Let's Move (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) gun control (2) front groups (1) community safety (1) measure N (2) race (1) language (6) Merck (1) Texas (1) sexual assault (1) autism (1) privilege (1) Black Lives Matter (1) children's health (3) stigma (1) campaign finance (1) healthy eating (1) reproductive justice (1) media (7) summer camps (1) food marketing (3) Proposition 29 (1) PepsiCo (1) Proposition 47 (1) Twitter (1) Marion Nestle (1) built environment (2) Penn State (3) San Francisco (3) gun violence (1) target marketing (7) HPV vaccine (1) junk food (2) ACEs (2) physical activity (1) social change (1) communication (2) prevention (1) marketing (1) emergency contraception (1) collaboration (1) food and beverage marketing (3) SB-5 (1) snap (1) public health policy (2) Berkeley (2) education (1) food justice (1) food industry (4) American Beverage Association (1) Coca-Cola (3) water (1) new year's resolutions (1) child sexual abuse (5) alcohol (5) auto safety (1) Joe Paterno (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) health care (1) Dora the Explorer (1) social justice (1) equity (3) vaccines (1) Telluride (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) apha (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) violence (2) youth (1) california (1) soda tax (11) mental health (2) community violence (1) Sandy Hook (2) gender (1) social media (2) sandusky (2) personal responsibility (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) choice (1) online marketing (1) Whiteclay (4) childhood lead poisoning (1) obesity prevention (1) framing (14) Bloomberg (3) product safety (1) social math (1) Rachel Grana (1) gatorade bolt game (1) health equity (10) Big Tobacco (3) prison phone calls (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) structural racism (1) Sam Kass (1) El Monte (3) food environment (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) public health (67) democracy (1) Happy Meals (1) Colorado (1) genital warts (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) abortion (1) SB 402 (1) news strategy (1) election 2016 (1) news coverage (1) Citizens United (1) seat belt laws (1) diabetes (1) public health data (1) cervical cancer (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) government intrusion (1) beauty products (1) Michelle Obama (1) prison system (1) SB 1000 (1) Connecticut shooting (1) nanny state (2) digital marketing (2) naacp (1) food swamps (1) community organizing (1) media analysis (5) cigarette advertising (1) cap the tap (1) McDonald's (1) Newtown (1) corporate social responsibility (1) junk food marketing (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) Tea Party (1) women's health (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: