McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


Amanda Fallin (1) cigarette advertising (1) physical activity (1) Tea Party (1) naacp (1) built environment (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) obesity (9) Big Soda (1) junk food marketing to kids (1) soda industry (3) HPV vaccine (1) government intrusion (1) apha (1) Catholic church (1) digital marketing (2) children's health (3) structural racism (1) food industry (2) food swamps (1) inequities (1) social justice (1) Let's Move (1) food (1) Texas (1) advocacy (3) obesity prevention (1) privilege (1) junk food (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) beverage industry (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) gender (1) Measure O (1) media advocacy (11) community health (1) food marketing (3) FCC (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Proposition 29 (1) cancer research (1) media (3) filibuster (1) Newtown (1) suicide nets (1) language (5) Coca-Cola (3) world water day (1) framing (7) personal responsibility (2) california (1) San Francisco (2) industry appeals to choice (1) Whiteclay (4) liana winett (1) soda tax (8) prison system (1) public health (50) Joe Paterno (1) nanny state (2) SSBs (1) social change (1) weight of the nation (1) prevention (1) paula deen (1) white house (1) health equity (9) Chile (1) Sandy Hook (2) Marion Nestle (1) sanitation (1) water security (1) front groups (1) sugary drinks (5) El Monte (2) abortion (1) soda warning labels (1) vaccines (1) tobacco tax (1) social media (1) institutional accountability (1) product safety (1) alcohol (4) food environment (1) media analysis (1) campaign finance (1) sports drinks (1) water (1) child sexual abuse (5) Connecticut shooting (1) Citizens United (1) mental health (2) ssb (1) food justice (1) PepsiCo (1) gun control (2) environmental health (1) Colorado (1) public health policy (1) breastfeeding (3) equity (3) target marketing (5) cap the tap (1) communication (1) Penn State (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) measure N (2) SB-5 (1) gun violence (1) diabetes (1) Merck (1) Berkeley (1) new year's resolutions (1) gatorade bolt game (1) sexual health (1) suicide barrier (2) SB 402 (1) chronic disease (2) cervical cancer (1) healthy eating (1) Happy Meals (1) tobacco industry (2) junk food marketing (3) SB 1000 (1) Bloomberg (3) marketing (1) Oglala Sioux (3) corporate social responsibility (1) McDonald's (1) Dora the Explorer (1) messaging (1) Michelle Obama (1) news strategy (1) Sam Kass (1) food and beverage marketing (3) george lakoff (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) food deserts (1) Big Food (2) sandusky (2) Big Tobacco (3) tobacco control (2) collaboration (1) violence prevention (6) autism (1) sexism (1) snap (1) genital warts (1) Aurora (1) food access (1) prison phone calls (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) cancer prevention (1) online marketing (1) reproductive justice (1) health care (1) tobacco (4) regulation (2) indoor smoking ban (1) childhood obesity (1) Richmond (4) Jerry Sandusky (3) choice (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) elephant triggers (1) Rachel Grana (1) summer camps (1) beauty products (1) suicide prevention (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) cosmetics (1) auto safety (1) stigma (1) values (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Gardasil (1) soda (12) American Beverage Association (1) seat belt laws (1) women's health (2) Wendy Davis (1) media bites (1) Nickelodeon (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: