McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

public health data (1) food (1) genital warts (1) values (1) election 2016 (1) racism (1) community safety (1) education (1) Newtown (1) sandusky (2) prevention (1) sexism (2) Citizens United (1) paper tigers (1) food justice (1) gun violence (1) healthy eating (1) Proposition 47 (1) youth (1) sports drinks (1) food marketing (3) American Beverage Association (1) reproductive justice (1) public health policy (2) language (6) Big Soda (2) online marketing (1) democracy (1) childhood adversity (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) emergency contraception (1) news monitoring (1) apha (2) media bites (1) Catholic church (1) Wendy Davis (1) health equity (10) food environment (1) social media (2) Happy Meals (1) news analysis (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) SB 1000 (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) auto safety (1) gender (1) privilege (1) Aurora (1) water security (1) food and beverage marketing (3) ssb (1) corporate social responsibility (1) tobacco control (2) marketing (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) sanitation (1) soda (12) HPV vaccine (1) soda tax (11) news strategy (1) Coca-Cola (3) george lakoff (1) suicide prevention (2) race (1) child sexual abuse (5) messaging (3) media (7) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Measure O (1) tobacco industry (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) personal responsibility (3) suicide nets (1) Connecticut shooting (1) obesity prevention (1) sexual assault (1) community (1) junk food (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) news coverage (1) social justice (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) McDonald's (1) tobacco (5) Joe Paterno (1) San Francisco (3) Gardasil (1) campaign finance (1) sexual health (1) public health (67) prison phone calls (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Chile (1) world water day (1) SB 402 (1) cervical cancer (1) media advocacy (21) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Richmond (5) diabetes (1) target marketing (7) indoor smoking ban (1) Berkeley (2) violence prevention (8) naacp (1) built environment (2) cap the tap (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) social change (1) tobacco tax (1) Penn State (3) Tea Party (1) childhood trauma (3) seat belt laws (1) food access (1) advocacy (3) weight of the nation (1) front groups (1) sugary drinks (10) food swamps (1) Whiteclay (4) water (1) social math (1) SSBs (1) FCC (1) structural racism (1) Donald Trump (2) stigma (1) autism (1) Twitter (1) Marion Nestle (1) SB-5 (1) cancer prevention (1) El Monte (3) Telluride (1) violence (2) cosmetics (1) ACEs (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) soda warning labels (1) Texas (1) default frame (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) political correctness (1) chronic disease (2) Nickelodeon (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) breastfeeding (3) PepsiCo (1) Black Lives Matter (1) mental health (2) junk food marketing (3) Let's Move (1) news (2) Bill Cosby (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) alcohol (5) choice (1) safety (1) product safety (1) community organizing (1) obesity (10) filibuster (1) measure N (2) children's health (3) soda taxes (2) vaccines (1) Oglala Sioux (3) physical activity (1) framing (14) paula deen (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Proposition 29 (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Merck (1) journalism (1) sexual violence (2) beauty products (1) soda industry (4) Big Food (2) industry appeals to choice (1) nanny state (2) women's health (2) california (1) Rachel Grana (1) gatorade bolt game (1) community violence (1) snap (1) childhood obesity (1) communication (2) collaboration (1) prison system (1) food deserts (1) abortion (1) equity (3) inequities (1) white house (1) summer camps (1) liana winett (1) elephant triggers (1) authentic voices (1) regulation (2) environmental health (1) cancer research (1) diabetes prevention (1) Big Tobacco (3) suicide barrier (2) new year's resolutions (1) gun control (2) Colorado (1) Amanda Fallin (1) government intrusion (1) Michelle Obama (1) media analysis (5) food industry (4) Sandy Hook (2) institutional accountability (1) community health (1) beverage industry (2) digital marketing (2) health care (1) Bloomberg (3) cigarette advertising (1) Sam Kass (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: