McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


food and beverage marketing (3) community health (1) gender (1) sandusky (2) PepsiCo (1) prison system (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Chile (1) front groups (1) nanny state (2) language (6) sexism (1) Let's Move (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Newtown (1) world water day (1) American Beverage Association (1) Joe Paterno (1) obesity (9) Nickelodeon (1) Wendy Davis (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) prevention (1) San Francisco (3) chronic disease (2) institutional accountability (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) FCC (1) environmental health (1) suicide prevention (2) media analysis (2) tobacco control (2) Proposition 29 (1) inequities (1) Rachel Grana (1) soda warning labels (1) healthy eating (1) sports drinks (1) built environment (2) soda (12) cosmetics (1) Tea Party (1) diabetes (1) junk food marketing (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) elephant triggers (1) genital warts (1) Big Food (2) indoor smoking ban (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) SSBs (1) naacp (1) SB-5 (1) child sexual abuse (5) Measure O (1) campaign finance (1) autism (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) apha (1) structural racism (1) filibuster (1) mental health (2) ssb (1) choice (1) sexual violence (1) media advocacy (16) snap (1) Berkeley (2) suicide barrier (2) paula deen (1) tobacco industry (2) Whiteclay (4) media bites (1) Aurora (1) corporate social responsibility (1) beverage industry (1) Happy Meals (1) HPV vaccine (1) news strategy (1) gun violence (1) equity (3) weight of the nation (1) Sandy Hook (2) water (1) social math (1) seat belt laws (1) regulation (2) food environment (1) sexual assault (1) government intrusion (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) SB 1000 (1) Texas (1) Catholic church (1) digital marketing (2) target marketing (5) news coverage (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) abortion (1) cervical cancer (1) personal responsibility (2) Michelle Obama (1) alcohol (4) physical activity (1) Merck (1) framing (9) SB 402 (1) Big Tobacco (3) social justice (1) Amanda Fallin (1) communication (2) sugary drinks (6) marketing (1) Connecticut shooting (1) white house (1) Bill Cosby (1) obesity prevention (1) tobacco tax (1) childhood obesity (1) Citizens United (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) women's health (2) stigma (1) beauty products (1) sanitation (1) liana winett (1) industry appeals to choice (1) public health data (1) violence prevention (6) media (4) social media (1) auto safety (1) soda tax (10) Gardasil (1) food swamps (1) cancer research (1) social change (1) water security (1) Richmond (5) food (1) california (1) new year's resolutions (1) messaging (2) public health (55) product safety (1) tobacco (4) values (1) vaccines (1) soda industry (4) george lakoff (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) gun control (2) public health policy (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Penn State (3) gatorade bolt game (1) health care (1) Colorado (1) summer camps (1) Marion Nestle (1) suicide nets (1) Sam Kass (1) food deserts (1) measure N (2) cancer prevention (1) violence (1) cap the tap (1) food marketing (3) advocacy (3) race (1) cigarette advertising (1) Telluride (1) Coca-Cola (3) youth (1) Big Soda (2) collaboration (1) reproductive justice (1) Oglala Sioux (3) health equity (9) food access (1) junk food (1) McDonald's (1) food industry (2) privilege (1) children's health (3) food justice (1) breastfeeding (3) Dora the Explorer (1) prison phone calls (1) Bloomberg (3) El Monte (3) sexual health (1) online marketing (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: