McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

media bites (1) suicide barrier (2) food (1) abortion (1) sports drinks (1) Tea Party (1) vaccines (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) health care (1) Richmond (4) gun control (2) Sandy Hook (2) tobacco control (2) Aurora (1) digital marketing (2) cigarette advertising (1) Berkeley (1) mental health (2) george lakoff (1) women's health (2) sugary drinks (6) Newtown (1) soda warning labels (1) Rachel Grana (1) world water day (1) online marketing (1) violence prevention (6) industry appeals to choice (1) tobacco (4) autism (1) community health (1) food access (1) Amanda Fallin (1) weight of the nation (1) HPV vaccine (1) sexual health (1) tobacco industry (2) Coca-Cola (3) cervical cancer (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) prison system (1) framing (7) auto safety (1) Whiteclay (4) soda tax (9) front groups (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) sexism (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) prevention (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) structural racism (1) messaging (2) apha (1) media advocacy (12) cap the tap (1) white house (1) junk food (1) environmental health (1) privilege (1) SB-5 (1) suicide prevention (2) paula deen (1) healthy eating (1) food environment (1) food marketing (3) children's health (3) government intrusion (1) regulation (2) summer camps (1) equity (3) social change (1) social media (1) Penn State (3) built environment (2) marketing (1) tobacco tax (1) gender (1) Colorado (1) physical activity (1) child sexual abuse (5) Connecticut shooting (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Gardasil (1) Joe Paterno (1) cancer research (1) SB 1000 (1) McDonald's (1) stigma (1) water security (1) liana winett (1) sanitation (1) Big Food (2) junk food marketing (3) food and beverage marketing (3) elephant triggers (1) water (1) obesity prevention (1) product safety (1) SB 402 (1) Chile (1) reproductive justice (1) Big Soda (1) genital warts (1) media analysis (1) advocacy (3) junk food marketing to kids (1) measure N (2) personal responsibility (2) corporate social responsibility (1) Michelle Obama (1) Catholic church (1) communication (2) food deserts (1) choice (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Oglala Sioux (3) diabetes (1) Bloomberg (3) public health (51) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Big Tobacco (3) Wendy Davis (1) childhood obesity (1) soda (12) San Francisco (2) alcohol (4) institutional accountability (1) cancer prevention (1) El Monte (2) sandusky (2) snap (1) suicide nets (1) target marketing (5) gun violence (1) collaboration (1) Citizens United (1) Nickelodeon (1) beauty products (1) breastfeeding (3) prison phone calls (1) inequities (1) food industry (2) Texas (1) chronic disease (2) news strategy (1) values (1) food justice (1) social justice (1) food swamps (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) gatorade bolt game (1) california (1) Merck (1) American Beverage Association (1) Marion Nestle (1) media (3) beverage industry (1) indoor smoking ban (1) SSBs (1) Happy Meals (1) public health policy (1) cosmetics (1) nanny state (2) PepsiCo (1) campaign finance (1) Measure O (1) seat belt laws (1) Sam Kass (1) new year's resolutions (1) filibuster (1) naacp (1) Proposition 29 (1) obesity (9) Johnson & Johnson (1) health equity (9) Twitter for advocacy (1) language (5) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) ssb (1) FCC (1) Let's Move (1) soda industry (4)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: