McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


media analysis (1) beauty products (1) Whiteclay (4) public health policy (1) health equity (9) Catholic church (1) breastfeeding (3) Penn State (3) suicide barrier (2) food industry (2) Happy Meals (1) naacp (1) cap the tap (1) social justice (1) product safety (1) inequities (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) women's health (2) mental health (2) nanny state (2) cancer prevention (1) gun control (2) soda (12) privilege (1) Proposition 29 (1) media (3) sanitation (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Richmond (4) reproductive justice (1) online marketing (1) structural racism (1) institutional accountability (1) obesity prevention (1) world water day (1) regulation (2) equity (3) American Beverage Association (1) news strategy (1) marketing (1) sexual health (1) measure N (2) Michelle Obama (1) obesity (9) junk food marketing (3) indoor smoking ban (1) food access (1) target marketing (5) built environment (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) tobacco tax (1) Wendy Davis (1) values (1) george lakoff (1) alcohol (4) choice (1) Gardasil (1) cancer research (1) Sandy Hook (2) FCC (1) Big Food (2) corporate social responsibility (1) government intrusion (1) cervical cancer (1) Tea Party (1) collaboration (1) tobacco control (2) Chile (1) Bloomberg (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) Nickelodeon (1) cigarette advertising (1) Oglala Sioux (3) digital marketing (2) messaging (1) SB 402 (1) Let's Move (1) prison system (1) gender (1) El Monte (2) campaign finance (1) water security (1) food (1) Rachel Grana (1) children's health (3) suicide prevention (2) Amanda Fallin (1) diabetes (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) media advocacy (11) Big Tobacco (3) SB 1000 (1) language (5) food deserts (1) Citizens United (1) food marketing (3) Texas (1) Connecticut shooting (1) apha (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) sandusky (2) media bites (1) soda industry (3) public health (50) healthy eating (1) Coca-Cola (3) McDonald's (1) soda warning labels (1) tobacco (4) San Francisco (2) seat belt laws (1) genital warts (1) violence prevention (6) Newtown (1) abortion (1) sexism (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Measure O (1) industry appeals to choice (1) physical activity (1) liana winett (1) Berkeley (1) junk food (1) personal responsibility (2) food environment (1) stigma (1) suicide nets (1) food swamps (1) junk food marketing to kids (1) sports drinks (1) Sam Kass (1) new year's resolutions (1) ssb (1) front groups (1) social media (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) social change (1) SB-5 (1) Joe Paterno (1) california (1) summer camps (1) advocacy (3) health care (1) prison phone calls (1) framing (7) sugary drinks (5) Jerry Sandusky (3) tobacco industry (2) elephant triggers (1) Merck (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Aurora (1) filibuster (1) paula deen (1) food justice (1) Marion Nestle (1) chronic disease (2) SSBs (1) beverage industry (1) environmental health (1) autism (1) weight of the nation (1) prevention (1) child sexual abuse (5) community health (1) water (1) Dora the Explorer (1) cosmetics (1) gun violence (1) childhood obesity (1) Colorado (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) PepsiCo (1) snap (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food and beverage marketing (3) white house (1) Big Soda (1) HPV vaccine (1) auto safety (1) vaccines (1) soda tax (8) communication (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: