McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


online marketing (1) food justice (1) soda (12) government intrusion (1) Telluride (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) child sexual abuse (5) collaboration (1) white house (1) diabetes (1) sexism (1) Amanda Fallin (1) physical activity (1) new year's resolutions (1) Catholic church (1) women's health (2) suicide prevention (2) sandusky (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Pine Ridge reservation (1) sanitation (1) campaign finance (1) media (4) Tea Party (1) news analysis (1) Proposition 29 (1) liana winett (1) cap the tap (1) Chile (1) privilege (1) george lakoff (1) seat belt laws (1) public health policy (2) Penn State (3) social math (1) community health (1) weight of the nation (1) McDonald's (1) ACEs (1) soda warning labels (1) measure N (2) sports drinks (1) emergency contraception (1) ssb (1) social justice (1) childhood trauma (1) SB 402 (1) news strategy (1) gun violence (1) cancer research (1) tobacco industry (2) equity (3) elephant triggers (1) tobacco control (2) Richmond (5) food swamps (1) Sandy Hook (2) Bill Cosby (1) Wendy Davis (1) American Beverage Association (1) Measure O (1) junk food (2) prison phone calls (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Rachel Grana (1) inequities (1) abortion (1) built environment (2) target marketing (7) structural racism (1) digital marketing (2) california (1) food and beverage marketing (3) social media (2) Whiteclay (4) Twitter (1) sugary drinks (9) health equity (9) tobacco tax (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sexual health (1) obesity (9) public health (58) Berkeley (2) healthy eating (1) food industry (2) Let's Move (1) health care (1) violence (1) food deserts (1) Big Tobacco (3) environmental health (1) autism (1) obesity prevention (1) Big Food (2) messaging (3) Bloomberg (3) Coca-Cola (3) SB 1000 (1) soda industry (4) tobacco (4) food access (1) cancer prevention (1) Texas (1) product safety (1) suicide barrier (2) personal responsibility (3) world water day (1) advocacy (3) alcohol (4) SSBs (1) El Monte (3) cigarette advertising (1) communication (2) default frame (1) FCC (1) cervical cancer (1) public health data (1) reproductive justice (1) chronic disease (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) PepsiCo (1) youth (1) paula deen (1) Michelle Obama (1) apha (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Joe Paterno (1) front groups (1) framing (11) food marketing (3) water (1) marketing (1) childhood obesity (1) water security (1) diabetes prevention (1) sexual assault (1) junk food marketing (3) Gardasil (1) HPV vaccine (1) breastfeeding (3) values (1) children's health (3) prevention (1) beauty products (1) stigma (1) media analysis (3) institutional accountability (1) violence prevention (6) San Francisco (3) snap (1) Sam Kass (1) Merck (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Marion Nestle (1) food (1) suicide nets (1) race (1) gun control (2) childhood adversity (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) indoor smoking ban (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) naacp (1) media bites (1) corporate social responsibility (1) industry appeals to choice (1) news coverage (1) SB-5 (1) genital warts (1) regulation (2) Nickelodeon (1) auto safety (1) summer camps (1) cosmetics (1) media advocacy (18) Colorado (1) prison system (1) gender (1) adverse childhood experiences (1) sexual violence (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) language (6) soda tax (11) Aurora (1) mental health (2) Citizens United (1) Newtown (1) choice (1) filibuster (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) social change (1) food environment (1) vaccines (1) beverage industry (1) Big Soda (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) nanny state (2) Happy Meals (1) Twitter for advocacy (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: