McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

physical activity (1) public health policy (1) gun violence (1) soda tax (10) public health (55) filibuster (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) vaccines (1) new year's resolutions (1) race (1) language (6) auto safety (1) women's health (2) media advocacy (15) tobacco tax (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) world water day (1) Richmond (5) gender (1) sugary drinks (6) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) collaboration (1) equity (3) white house (1) FCC (1) Dora the Explorer (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Penn State (3) food environment (1) choice (1) prison system (1) breastfeeding (3) cap the tap (1) beauty products (1) Wendy Davis (1) American Beverage Association (1) abortion (1) Connecticut shooting (1) food access (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Coca-Cola (3) cancer prevention (1) inequities (1) mental health (2) sexual assault (1) cervical cancer (1) Amanda Fallin (1) water security (1) Tea Party (1) community health (1) digital marketing (2) online marketing (1) Berkeley (2) junk food marketing (3) seat belt laws (1) apha (1) social change (1) weight of the nation (1) gatorade bolt game (1) naacp (1) Chile (1) news strategy (1) chronic disease (2) elephant triggers (1) front groups (1) Sam Kass (1) Gardasil (1) Colorado (1) food justice (1) cigarette advertising (1) Catholic church (1) children's health (3) built environment (2) youth (1) Michelle Obama (1) sexual violence (1) Merck (1) Bill Cosby (1) stigma (1) product safety (1) autism (1) privilege (1) Let's Move (1) tobacco (4) food marketing (3) health equity (9) violence prevention (6) liana winett (1) beverage industry (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) personal responsibility (2) SB 402 (1) regulation (2) sexual health (1) soda industry (4) structural racism (1) Bloomberg (3) tobacco industry (2) Oglala Sioux (3) paula deen (1) measure N (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) social media (1) media bites (1) industry appeals to choice (1) communication (2) Newtown (1) institutional accountability (1) Texas (1) corporate social responsibility (1) social justice (1) Rachel Grana (1) news coverage (1) nanny state (2) Measure O (1) Big Tobacco (3) sports drinks (1) framing (9) junk food (1) Sandy Hook (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) Joe Paterno (1) campaign finance (1) Whiteclay (4) Citizens United (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) suicide nets (1) george lakoff (1) media (4) alcohol (4) HPV vaccine (1) summer camps (1) Proposition 29 (1) california (1) food deserts (1) SB-5 (1) target marketing (5) food and beverage marketing (3) cosmetics (1) health care (1) media analysis (2) messaging (2) Big Soda (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) cancer research (1) SB 1000 (1) suicide prevention (2) SSBs (1) childhood obesity (1) Happy Meals (1) Marion Nestle (1) food swamps (1) marketing (1) tobacco control (2) El Monte (3) obesity prevention (1) advocacy (3) sandusky (2) PepsiCo (1) gun control (2) Big Food (2) violence (1) Telluride (1) ssb (1) Aurora (1) healthy eating (1) child sexual abuse (5) reproductive justice (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) genital warts (1) food industry (2) obesity (9) soda warning labels (1) diabetes (1) values (1) government intrusion (1) sexism (1) McDonald's (1) prevention (1) suicide barrier (2) water (1) prison phone calls (1) environmental health (1) San Francisco (3) food (1) soda (12) Nickelodeon (1) sanitation (1) snap (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: