McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


obesity (9) campaign finance (1) water security (1) Michelle Obama (1) junk food (1) social justice (1) tobacco control (2) sexual health (1) liana winett (1) children's health (3) regulation (2) healthy eating (1) measure N (2) food justice (1) Joe Paterno (1) Bloomberg (3) violence prevention (6) tobacco tax (1) Happy Meals (1) environmental health (1) summer camps (1) sexism (1) government intrusion (1) sandusky (2) equity (3) suicide prevention (2) vaccines (1) obesity prevention (1) Sam Kass (1) soda warning labels (1) gender (1) junk food marketing (3) tobacco industry (2) front groups (1) apha (1) SSBs (1) prevention (1) advocacy (3) Sandy Hook (2) food industry (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) Big Soda (1) cervical cancer (1) soda industry (4) SB-5 (1) Citizens United (1) framing (7) Gardasil (1) Colorado (1) gun violence (1) online marketing (1) stigma (1) gun control (2) Oglala Sioux (3) nanny state (2) digital marketing (2) institutional accountability (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Let's Move (1) media (3) inequities (1) SB 402 (1) food (1) Dora the Explorer (1) alcohol (4) food marketing (3) public health policy (1) suicide nets (1) beauty products (1) food and beverage marketing (3) values (1) Penn State (3) collaboration (1) structural racism (1) El Monte (2) mental health (2) choice (1) Rachel Grana (1) autism (1) communication (2) Catholic church (1) Aurora (1) community health (1) sports drinks (1) cancer research (1) gatorade bolt game (1) sanitation (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) sugary drinks (6) target marketing (5) child sexual abuse (5) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) soda tax (9) food deserts (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Merck (1) Whiteclay (4) women's health (2) indoor smoking ban (1) HPV vaccine (1) junk food marketing to kids (1) prison system (1) weight of the nation (1) Connecticut shooting (1) language (5) privilege (1) world water day (1) media bites (1) cap the tap (1) Wendy Davis (1) public health (51) Big Tobacco (3) breastfeeding (3) cigarette advertising (1) Texas (1) corporate social responsibility (1) seat belt laws (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Tea Party (1) chronic disease (2) diabetes (1) filibuster (1) suicide barrier (2) personal responsibility (2) white house (1) Berkeley (1) Measure O (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) ssb (1) reproductive justice (1) cosmetics (1) Chile (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) california (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Amanda Fallin (1) health care (1) food access (1) physical activity (1) media analysis (1) Marion Nestle (1) social change (1) health equity (9) social media (1) george lakoff (1) Coca-Cola (3) Richmond (4) American Beverage Association (1) new year's resolutions (1) elephant triggers (1) abortion (1) water (1) news strategy (1) Newtown (1) cancer prevention (1) paula deen (1) Nickelodeon (1) food swamps (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) messaging (2) snap (1) Proposition 29 (1) FCC (1) soda (12) genital warts (1) food environment (1) Big Food (2) McDonald's (1) PepsiCo (1) San Francisco (2) media advocacy (12) marketing (1) childhood obesity (1) beverage industry (1) naacp (1) built environment (2) industry appeals to choice (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) SB 1000 (1) product safety (1) auto safety (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) tobacco (4) prison phone calls (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: