McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


digital marketing (2) communication (2) journalism (1) Merck (1) strategic communication (1) beauty products (1) gender (1) Coca-Cola (3) American Beverage Association (1) emergency contraception (1) personal responsibility (3) tobacco (5) SB 402 (1) language (6) food environment (1) suicide nets (1) food industry (4) alcohol (5) privilege (1) SSBs (1) equity (3) product safety (1) world water day (1) SB-5 (1) food justice (1) childhood trauma (3) advocacy (3) obesity (10) water (1) sexism (2) industry appeals to choice (1) community health (1) social change (1) food access (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) soda warning labels (1) social justice (2) social math (1) measure N (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Dora the Explorer (1) media analysis (6) paper tigers (1) Colorado (1) liana winett (1) soda industry (4) online marketing (1) Big Tobacco (3) racism (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) sports drinks (1) abortion (1) Newtown (1) health care (1) nanny state (2) FCC (1) soda taxes (2) public health data (1) childhood obesity (1) elephant triggers (1) choice (1) Let's Move (1) Big Soda (2) Twitter (1) auto safety (1) Whiteclay (4) institutional accountability (1) community (1) junk food marketing (4) breastfeeding (3) healthy eating (1) reproductive justice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) vaccines (1) food deserts (1) indoor smoking ban (1) junk food (2) autism (1) physical activity (1) Joe Paterno (1) summer camps (1) Penn State (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) prison phone calls (1) marketing (1) cervical cancer (1) Wendy Davis (1) paula deen (1) social media (2) news coverage (1) sanitation (1) sexual health (1) ACEs (2) cannes lions festival (1) Aurora (1) target marketing (8) nonprofit communications (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Nickelodeon (1) front groups (1) prevention (1) Citizens United (1) education (1) cosmetics (1) gatorade bolt game (1) McDonald's (1) Measure O (1) Chile (1) messaging (3) violence (2) corporate social responsibility (1) seat belt laws (1) political correctness (1) violence prevention (8) california (1) food swamps (1) Sam Kass (1) genital warts (1) framing (14) Amanda Fallin (1) public health (70) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) george lakoff (1) Richmond (5) soda (12) sexual assault (1) race (1) food and beverage marketing (3) white house (1) Tea Party (1) gun violence (1) Gardasil (1) women's health (2) San Francisco (3) community safety (1) naacp (1) news (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) diabetes prevention (1) youth (1) Berkeley (2) obesity prevention (1) Marion Nestle (1) environmental health (1) default frame (1) Sandy Hook (2) Texas (1) PepsiCo (1) communication strategy (1) tobacco tax (1) Bloomberg (3) values (1) HPV vaccine (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) sexual violence (2) Proposition 29 (1) Happy Meals (1) public health policy (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) cancer prevention (1) Donald Trump (2) tobacco industry (2) media (7) democracy (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Proposition 47 (1) apha (3) media advocacy (23) stigma (1) soda tax (11) child sexual abuse (5) Catholic church (1) cancer research (1) El Monte (3) Michelle Obama (1) beverage industry (2) community violence (1) Rachel Grana (1) new year's resolutions (1) snap (1) chronic disease (2) media bites (1) SB 1000 (1) Big Food (2) safety (1) food marketing (4) health equity (10) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) collaboration (1) news monitoring (1) food (1) childhood adversity (1) authentic voices (1) Black Lives Matter (1) tobacco control (2) prison system (1) news strategy (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) diabetes (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) community organizing (1) suicide prevention (2) inequities (1) children's health (3) built environment (2) mental health (2) election 2016 (1) sandusky (2) Connecticut shooting (1) structural racism (1) weight of the nation (1) government intrusion (1) suicide barrier (2) regulation (2) water security (1) gun control (2) campaign finance (1) Bill Cosby (1) sugary drinks (10) cap the tap (1) ssb (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Telluride (1) news analysis (3) cigarette advertising (1) filibuster (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: