McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

food environment (1) autism (1) health care (1) cigarette advertising (1) SB 402 (1) measure N (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) Let's Move (1) community health (1) Michelle Obama (1) news coverage (1) weight of the nation (1) child sexual abuse (5) language (6) McDonald's (1) children's health (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) messaging (2) Catholic church (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) race (1) Sandy Hook (2) Whiteclay (4) Twitter for advocacy (1) HPV vaccine (1) cosmetics (1) SB-5 (1) Gardasil (1) communication (2) San Francisco (3) Proposition 29 (1) prison phone calls (1) personal responsibility (3) cancer prevention (1) online marketing (1) gender (1) Twitter (1) mental health (2) sexual assault (1) Aurora (1) product safety (1) water security (1) built environment (2) obesity (9) health equity (9) default frame (1) Newtown (1) SSBs (1) auto safety (1) Measure O (1) cap the tap (1) food justice (1) violence (1) target marketing (6) privilege (1) media advocacy (17) Big Food (2) chronic disease (2) American Beverage Association (1) choice (1) structural racism (1) Marion Nestle (1) food (1) soda industry (4) El Monte (3) news strategy (1) seat belt laws (1) social change (1) Wendy Davis (1) beauty products (1) Coca-Cola (3) new year's resolutions (1) california (1) Telluride (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Happy Meals (1) Sam Kass (1) soda warning labels (1) sugary drinks (7) Big Tobacco (3) water (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Bill Cosby (1) diabetes prevention (1) sandusky (2) prevention (1) soda tax (10) diabetes (1) violence prevention (6) Colorado (1) gun control (2) media analysis (3) sports drinks (1) campaign finance (1) marketing (1) gun violence (1) cervical cancer (1) liana winett (1) SB 1000 (1) elephant triggers (1) food and beverage marketing (3) industry appeals to choice (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) physical activity (1) childhood adversity (1) tobacco tax (1) Bloomberg (3) sexual violence (1) filibuster (1) tobacco control (2) tobacco (4) reproductive justice (1) suicide barrier (2) front groups (1) digital marketing (2) Texas (1) social media (2) apha (1) breastfeeding (3) Connecticut shooting (1) vaccines (1) white house (1) Merck (1) FCC (1) Rachel Grana (1) Tea Party (1) Berkeley (2) abortion (1) Penn State (3) collaboration (1) inequities (1) sanitation (1) soda (12) food swamps (1) genital warts (1) framing (10) Oglala Sioux (3) suicide nets (1) adverse childhood experiences (1) social math (1) naacp (1) youth (1) summer camps (1) world water day (1) tobacco industry (2) government intrusion (1) suicide prevention (2) Richmond (5) snap (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) PepsiCo (1) nanny state (2) regulation (2) healthy eating (1) Joe Paterno (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Citizens United (1) emergency contraception (1) prison system (1) food deserts (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) alcohol (4) stigma (1) public health policy (1) advocacy (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) public health (57) Dora the Explorer (1) paula deen (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food industry (2) equity (3) junk food marketing (3) obesity prevention (1) environmental health (1) sexism (1) values (1) sexual health (1) childhood obesity (1) media (4) ssb (1) Chile (1) public health data (1) women's health (2) Big Soda (2) junk food (1) food marketing (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) gatorade bolt game (1) george lakoff (1) Nickelodeon (1) food access (1) Amanda Fallin (1) social justice (1) beverage industry (1) cancer research (1) institutional accountability (1) ACEs (1) media bites (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) childhood trauma (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: