McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

sugary drinks (6) media analysis (1) Proposition 29 (1) institutional accountability (1) sanitation (1) abortion (1) suicide prevention (2) prison phone calls (1) Sam Kass (1) junk food marketing (3) El Monte (2) soda industry (4) Merck (1) Oglala Sioux (3) world water day (1) white house (1) Big Food (2) food marketing (3) Let's Move (1) liana winett (1) physical activity (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) media (3) water (1) california (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) food access (1) food industry (2) tobacco tax (1) online marketing (1) diabetes (1) sexual health (1) food swamps (1) collaboration (1) personal responsibility (2) gun violence (1) sexism (1) genital warts (1) news strategy (1) soda (12) soda warning labels (1) equity (3) messaging (2) front groups (1) Colorado (1) violence prevention (6) mental health (2) food environment (1) sports drinks (1) autism (1) media advocacy (13) children's health (3) apha (1) child sexual abuse (5) healthy eating (1) communication (2) Bloomberg (3) Michelle Obama (1) women's health (2) food deserts (1) Citizens United (1) product safety (1) SSBs (1) junk food (1) cancer research (1) language (6) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) SB 402 (1) Chile (1) cigarette advertising (1) Gardasil (1) cap the tap (1) digital marketing (2) built environment (2) new year's resolutions (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) corporate social responsibility (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Happy Meals (1) Dora the Explorer (1) breastfeeding (3) Coca-Cola (3) McDonald's (1) seat belt laws (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Big Tobacco (3) campaign finance (1) tobacco industry (2) Texas (1) FCC (1) industry appeals to choice (1) stigma (1) gun control (2) target marketing (5) public health (53) tobacco control (2) health equity (9) cosmetics (1) Wendy Davis (1) filibuster (1) tobacco (4) Newtown (1) naacp (1) Measure O (1) Catholic church (1) Aurora (1) SB 1000 (1) prison system (1) summer camps (1) water security (1) Joe Paterno (1) suicide nets (1) Big Soda (1) suicide barrier (2) obesity prevention (1) environmental health (1) beverage industry (1) gatorade bolt game (1) government intrusion (1) Tea Party (1) Penn State (3) SB-5 (1) cervical cancer (1) soda tax (9) vaccines (1) Marion Nestle (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) snap (1) obesity (9) indoor smoking ban (1) framing (9) Amanda Fallin (1) george lakoff (1) health care (1) public health policy (1) San Francisco (2) Sandy Hook (2) childhood obesity (1) measure N (2) advocacy (3) privilege (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) alcohol (4) values (1) regulation (2) sandusky (2) prevention (1) weight of the nation (1) media bites (1) social media (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Rachel Grana (1) inequities (1) community health (1) Berkeley (1) gender (1) social justice (1) reproductive justice (1) auto safety (1) ssb (1) beauty products (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food justice (1) marketing (1) food (1) Whiteclay (4) structural racism (1) cancer prevention (1) chronic disease (2) PepsiCo (1) HPV vaccine (1) social change (1) Richmond (4) nanny state (2) choice (1) elephant triggers (1) food and beverage marketing (3) American Beverage Association (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Nickelodeon (1) paula deen (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: