Wrong move for Let's Move?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Is Michelle Obama's

For supporters of a national policy to reduce the selling and marketing of junk food to kids -- among them noted healthy food advocate Marion Nestle -- this apparent shift in focus was more than disheartening. As Nestle points out, there are three main reasons this would be an unfortunate direction: First, a sole focus on physical activity negates the fact that to lose weight, most people still have to eat healthy whether or not they move more. Second, it undermines all the recent work that's been put into getting the message out about healthy diets.

Nestle's third reason -- and perhaps most important of all -- is that a that a shift away from healthy eating "declares victory prematurely" for food manufacturers and marketers. She cites an excerpt from Obama's speech: "Major food manufacturers are cutting sugar, salt and fat from their products. Restaurants are revamping kids' menus and loading them with healthier, fresher option." But as Nestle and others have observed, there have been many promises from food companies but little action.

"The political cost of fighting the food industry is surely the reason for the change in Mrs. Obama's rhetoric," asserted Nestle.

The White House's Let's Move senior policy advisor Sam Kass was quick to respond last week, saying that no pullback away from promoting healthy diets was planned. Instead, he said Obama's speech was intended to inform us about the campaign's expansion into another one of the program's five essential "pillars" which include: creating a healthy start for children; empowering parents and caregivers; providing healthy food in schools; improving access to healthy, affordable foods; and increasing physical activity.

Let's hope Kass' clarification of Obama's comments means that Let's Move is in fact looking to be more comprehensive and not selectively choosing to emphasize one "pillar" over another based on political expediency. As usual, Nestle says it best: "In the broader context of the Let's Move pillars, a focus on physical activity makes sense. It is an addition, not a substitution."

The last thing we need is to pit healthy eating against physical activity. As BMSG director Lori Dorfman and health advocate Toni Yancey pointed out in their 2009 article for Preventive Medicine: Good nutrition and regular physical activity are BOTH necessary for preventing chronic disease. Let's Move should not give up on holding the food industry accountable for selling junk food to children and families while working to keep Americans physically active.

Let's Movecampaign moving in the wrong direction? The First Lady recently announced that she will focus more on getting kids to be more active. Does this mean less time encouraging food companies to make healthier products for kids and stop marketing junk food to them?


abortion (1) tobacco (5) language (6) junk food marketing to kids (2) community health (1) public health (71) race (1) community safety (1) violence prevention (8) industry appeals to choice (1) PepsiCo (1) Chile (1) Sam Kass (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) sexual violence (2) sexual health (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) naacp (1) San Francisco (3) gatorade bolt game (1) breastfeeding (3) Proposition 29 (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Sandy Hook (2) messaging (3) community (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) news strategy (1) seat belt laws (1) white house (1) cancer prevention (1) soda (12) food access (1) public health policy (2) Penn State (3) genital warts (1) auto safety (1) obesity (10) food marketing (5) soda industry (4) personal responsibility (3) equity (3) Catholic church (1) women's health (2) water (1) physical activity (1) corporate social responsibility (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) news coverage (1) tobacco industry (2) media analysis (6) childhood trauma (3) paper tigers (1) inequities (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) news (2) SSBs (1) Bill Cosby (1) sexual assault (1) world water day (1) cosmetics (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Nickelodeon (1) autism (1) Twitter (1) food environment (1) Whiteclay (4) McDonald's (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) digital marketing (3) chronic disease (2) media (7) news monitoring (1) target marketing (9) Joe Paterno (1) gender (1) Gardasil (1) tobacco tax (1) diabetes prevention (1) strategic communication (1) Happy Meals (1) paula deen (1) sports drinks (1) El Monte (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) Big Food (2) SB 402 (1) soda warning labels (1) cancer research (1) marketing (1) sandusky (2) Big Soda (2) Berkeley (2) new year's resolutions (1) journalism (1) front groups (1) obesity prevention (1) Let's Move (1) measure N (2) Texas (1) stigma (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Measure O (1) institutional accountability (1) suicide nets (1) weight of the nation (1) beauty products (1) Merck (1) regulation (2) cigarette advertising (1) default frame (1) prevention (1) cannes lions festival (1) Wendy Davis (1) Bloomberg (3) Proposition 47 (1) food (1) framing (14) social media (2) diabetes (1) reproductive justice (1) education (1) social justice (2) cap the tap (1) Richmond (5) sanitation (1) california (1) Donald Trump (2) ACEs (2) built environment (2) social change (1) sexism (2) privilege (1) SB-5 (1) communication strategy (1) safety (1) values (1) mental health (2) prison phone calls (1) food justice (1) food deserts (1) vaccines (1) health equity (10) children's health (3) healthy eating (1) junk food marketing (4) communication (2) alcohol (5) snap (1) gun control (2) Citizens United (1) HPV vaccine (1) food industry (4) liana winett (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) campaign finance (1) apha (3) gun violence (1) Marion Nestle (1) prison system (1) Newtown (1) ssb (1) Tea Party (1) water security (1) nanny state (2) beverage industry (2) food swamps (1) public health data (1) soda tax (11) childhood obesity (1) advocacy (3) community violence (1) political correctness (1) American Beverage Association (1) structural racism (1) summer camps (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Big Tobacco (3) cervical cancer (1) FCC (1) media advocacy (23) health care (1) online marketing (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Coca-Cola (3) product safety (1) social math (1) Michelle Obama (1) george lakoff (1) Dora the Explorer (1) elephant triggers (1) environmental health (1) choice (1) Oglala Sioux (3) youth (1) suicide barrier (2) collaboration (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) soda taxes (2) racism (1) suicide prevention (2) sugary drinks (10) Colorado (1) media bites (1) SB 1000 (1) government intrusion (1) democracy (1) emergency contraception (1) Aurora (1) filibuster (1) nonprofit communications (1) childhood adversity (1) Rachel Grana (1) tobacco control (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) violence (2) Telluride (1) junk food (2) Black Lives Matter (1) community organizing (1) child sexual abuse (5) news analysis (3) food and beverage marketing (3) authentic voices (1) election 2016 (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: