Wrong move for Let's Move?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Is Michelle Obama's

For supporters of a national policy to reduce the selling and marketing of junk food to kids -- among them noted healthy food advocate Marion Nestle -- this apparent shift in focus was more than disheartening. As Nestle points out, there are three main reasons this would be an unfortunate direction: First, a sole focus on physical activity negates the fact that to lose weight, most people still have to eat healthy whether or not they move more. Second, it undermines all the recent work that's been put into getting the message out about healthy diets.

Nestle's third reason -- and perhaps most important of all -- is that a that a shift away from healthy eating "declares victory prematurely" for food manufacturers and marketers. She cites an excerpt from Obama's speech: "Major food manufacturers are cutting sugar, salt and fat from their products. Restaurants are revamping kids' menus and loading them with healthier, fresher option." But as Nestle and others have observed, there have been many promises from food companies but little action.

"The political cost of fighting the food industry is surely the reason for the change in Mrs. Obama's rhetoric," asserted Nestle.

The White House's Let's Move senior policy advisor Sam Kass was quick to respond last week, saying that no pullback away from promoting healthy diets was planned. Instead, he said Obama's speech was intended to inform us about the campaign's expansion into another one of the program's five essential "pillars" which include: creating a healthy start for children; empowering parents and caregivers; providing healthy food in schools; improving access to healthy, affordable foods; and increasing physical activity.

Let's hope Kass' clarification of Obama's comments means that Let's Move is in fact looking to be more comprehensive and not selectively choosing to emphasize one "pillar" over another based on political expediency. As usual, Nestle says it best: "In the broader context of the Let's Move pillars, a focus on physical activity makes sense. It is an addition, not a substitution."

The last thing we need is to pit healthy eating against physical activity. As BMSG director Lori Dorfman and health advocate Toni Yancey pointed out in their 2009 article for Preventive Medicine: Good nutrition and regular physical activity are BOTH necessary for preventing chronic disease. Let's Move should not give up on holding the food industry accountable for selling junk food to children and families while working to keep Americans physically active.

Let's Movecampaign moving in the wrong direction? The First Lady recently announced that she will focus more on getting kids to be more active. Does this mean less time encouraging food companies to make healthier products for kids and stop marketing junk food to them?


community (1) soda tax (11) news (2) Richmond (5) Aurora (1) digital marketing (3) SB 402 (1) framing (14) food deserts (1) diabetes (1) front groups (1) childhood adversity (1) obesity prevention (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Oglala Sioux (3) Berkeley (2) reproductive justice (1) HPV vaccine (1) SB 1000 (1) Happy Meals (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) liana winett (1) Twitter (1) Chile (1) beauty products (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) soda taxes (2) junk food (2) Sam Kass (1) Big Soda (2) tobacco industry (2) media advocacy (23) violence prevention (8) gatorade bolt game (1) food swamps (1) gun violence (1) SB-5 (1) Black Lives Matter (1) industry appeals to choice (1) food access (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) regulation (2) environmental health (1) Let's Move (1) breastfeeding (3) food industry (4) summer camps (1) government intrusion (1) abortion (1) news coverage (1) health equity (10) El Monte (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) nanny state (2) communication (2) McDonald's (1) tobacco control (2) Proposition 47 (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) childhood trauma (3) auto safety (1) cervical cancer (1) cancer research (1) cannes lions festival (1) racism (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) childhood obesity (1) soda industry (4) sugary drinks (10) news monitoring (1) cap the tap (1) prevention (1) ssb (1) Coca-Cola (3) Colorado (1) cosmetics (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) junk food marketing (4) cancer prevention (1) education (1) gun control (2) public health data (1) indoor smoking ban (1) online marketing (1) Bill Cosby (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) healthy eating (1) Donald Trump (2) elephant triggers (1) suicide prevention (2) suicide nets (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) equity (3) Citizens United (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) autism (1) public health policy (2) community health (1) product safety (1) white house (1) filibuster (1) FCC (1) prison system (1) tobacco tax (1) california (1) tobacco (5) cigarette advertising (1) Michelle Obama (1) campaign finance (1) soda warning labels (1) political correctness (1) emergency contraception (1) Wendy Davis (1) Joe Paterno (1) SSBs (1) Dora the Explorer (1) sexual assault (1) world water day (1) safety (1) privilege (1) institutional accountability (1) Catholic church (1) new year's resolutions (1) corporate social responsibility (1) marketing (1) water (1) sexism (2) sports drinks (1) default frame (1) Marion Nestle (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Newtown (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Bloomberg (3) community safety (1) Connecticut shooting (1) American Beverage Association (1) collaboration (1) violence (2) children's health (3) women's health (2) mental health (2) chronic disease (2) communication strategy (1) public health (71) paper tigers (1) Whiteclay (4) measure N (2) stigma (1) community violence (1) social justice (2) ACEs (2) choice (1) soda (12) Tea Party (1) paula deen (1) Nickelodeon (1) journalism (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) target marketing (9) sanitation (1) inequities (1) Penn State (3) Big Tobacco (3) media bites (1) obesity (10) PepsiCo (1) advocacy (3) news strategy (1) gender (1) values (1) Texas (1) news analysis (3) suicide barrier (2) Merck (1) personal responsibility (3) weight of the nation (1) authentic voices (1) Measure O (1) strategic communication (1) structural racism (1) prison phone calls (1) child sexual abuse (5) social media (2) food environment (1) language (6) sexual violence (2) social change (1) built environment (2) naacp (1) community organizing (1) media (7) democracy (1) sexual health (1) Sandy Hook (2) San Francisco (3) election 2016 (1) youth (1) beverage industry (2) vaccines (1) apha (3) food justice (1) Big Food (2) snap (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) genital warts (1) food and beverage marketing (3) diabetes prevention (1) nonprofit communications (1) physical activity (1) food (1) george lakoff (1) Gardasil (1) water security (1) race (1) messaging (3) Telluride (1) Rachel Grana (1) sandusky (2) health care (1) Proposition 29 (1) alcohol (5) food marketing (5) seat belt laws (1) social math (1) media analysis (6)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: