Wrong move for Let's Move?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Is Michelle Obama's

For supporters of a national policy to reduce the selling and marketing of junk food to kids -- among them noted healthy food advocate Marion Nestle -- this apparent shift in focus was more than disheartening. As Nestle points out, there are three main reasons this would be an unfortunate direction: First, a sole focus on physical activity negates the fact that to lose weight, most people still have to eat healthy whether or not they move more. Second, it undermines all the recent work that's been put into getting the message out about healthy diets.

Nestle's third reason -- and perhaps most important of all -- is that a that a shift away from healthy eating "declares victory prematurely" for food manufacturers and marketers. She cites an excerpt from Obama's speech: "Major food manufacturers are cutting sugar, salt and fat from their products. Restaurants are revamping kids' menus and loading them with healthier, fresher option." But as Nestle and others have observed, there have been many promises from food companies but little action.

"The political cost of fighting the food industry is surely the reason for the change in Mrs. Obama's rhetoric," asserted Nestle.

The White House's Let's Move senior policy advisor Sam Kass was quick to respond last week, saying that no pullback away from promoting healthy diets was planned. Instead, he said Obama's speech was intended to inform us about the campaign's expansion into another one of the program's five essential "pillars" which include: creating a healthy start for children; empowering parents and caregivers; providing healthy food in schools; improving access to healthy, affordable foods; and increasing physical activity.

Let's hope Kass' clarification of Obama's comments means that Let's Move is in fact looking to be more comprehensive and not selectively choosing to emphasize one "pillar" over another based on political expediency. As usual, Nestle says it best: "In the broader context of the Let's Move pillars, a focus on physical activity makes sense. It is an addition, not a substitution."

The last thing we need is to pit healthy eating against physical activity. As BMSG director Lori Dorfman and health advocate Toni Yancey pointed out in their 2009 article for Preventive Medicine: Good nutrition and regular physical activity are BOTH necessary for preventing chronic disease. Let's Move should not give up on holding the food industry accountable for selling junk food to children and families while working to keep Americans physically active.

Let's Movecampaign moving in the wrong direction? The First Lady recently announced that she will focus more on getting kids to be more active. Does this mean less time encouraging food companies to make healthier products for kids and stop marketing junk food to them?


personal responsibility (3) Aurora (1) tobacco control (2) george lakoff (1) Berkeley (2) El Monte (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) childhood adversity (1) public health policy (2) Measure O (1) childhood obesity (1) Bill Cosby (1) default frame (1) food marketing (4) seat belt laws (1) childhood trauma (3) weight of the nation (1) cigarette advertising (1) American Beverage Association (1) indoor smoking ban (1) tobacco industry (2) food and beverage marketing (3) reproductive justice (1) Sam Kass (1) government intrusion (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) new year's resolutions (1) Sandy Hook (2) democracy (1) strategic communication (1) tobacco tax (1) social math (1) communication (2) youth (1) community violence (1) liana winett (1) sports drinks (1) SSBs (1) california (1) SB 402 (1) messaging (3) gatorade bolt game (1) environmental health (1) FCC (1) news coverage (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) violence prevention (8) naacp (1) news analysis (3) media (7) Donald Trump (2) genital warts (1) measure N (2) prison phone calls (1) obesity prevention (1) racism (1) snap (1) Michelle Obama (1) Telluride (1) community (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Chile (1) sexual health (1) Penn State (3) mental health (2) food access (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) obesity (10) SB 1000 (1) prison system (1) marketing (1) social justice (2) media analysis (6) Dora the Explorer (1) Marion Nestle (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Joe Paterno (1) Wendy Davis (1) cap the tap (1) water security (1) suicide nets (1) built environment (2) election 2016 (1) gun violence (1) structural racism (1) soda industry (4) healthy eating (1) values (1) Let's Move (1) emergency contraception (1) sandusky (2) Colorado (1) corporate social responsibility (1) target marketing (8) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) physical activity (1) social media (2) vaccines (1) junk food (2) news monitoring (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) community safety (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) stigma (1) soda (12) children's health (3) product safety (1) public health data (1) choice (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) digital marketing (2) journalism (1) cannes lions festival (1) community organizing (1) nonprofit communications (1) Nickelodeon (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) collaboration (1) prevention (1) advocacy (3) health care (1) Black Lives Matter (1) world water day (1) online marketing (1) suicide prevention (2) alcohol (5) water (1) communication strategy (1) paula deen (1) cosmetics (1) front groups (1) authentic voices (1) soda taxes (2) elephant triggers (1) food environment (1) diabetes prevention (1) sanitation (1) ACEs (2) PepsiCo (1) regulation (2) Texas (1) news (2) women's health (2) framing (14) institutional accountability (1) Whiteclay (4) media bites (1) cancer research (1) gun control (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) Rachel Grana (1) breastfeeding (3) sexual assault (1) chronic disease (2) media advocacy (23) community health (1) food (1) ssb (1) Newtown (1) filibuster (1) auto safety (1) food industry (4) political correctness (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) privilege (1) Coca-Cola (3) Twitter (1) sexual violence (2) sugary drinks (10) Amanda Fallin (1) sexism (2) autism (1) Big Soda (2) food swamps (1) social change (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) nanny state (2) Bloomberg (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Gardasil (1) Citizens United (1) safety (1) paper tigers (1) food justice (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) cancer prevention (1) San Francisco (3) race (1) equity (3) beverage industry (2) Proposition 29 (1) Richmond (5) white house (1) SB-5 (1) gender (1) public health (70) diabetes (1) child sexual abuse (5) news strategy (1) inequities (1) junk food marketing (4) campaign finance (1) soda tax (11) language (6) Big Tobacco (3) cervical cancer (1) Happy Meals (1) summer camps (1) Catholic church (1) Merck (1) soda warning labels (1) apha (3) food deserts (1) Proposition 47 (1) violence (2) abortion (1) HPV vaccine (1) tobacco (5) Tea Party (1) suicide barrier (2) Big Food (2) education (1) McDonald's (1) beauty products (1) health equity (10)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: