Wrong move for Let's Move?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Is Michelle Obama's

For supporters of a national policy to reduce the selling and marketing of junk food to kids -- among them noted healthy food advocate Marion Nestle -- this apparent shift in focus was more than disheartening. As Nestle points out, there are three main reasons this would be an unfortunate direction: First, a sole focus on physical activity negates the fact that to lose weight, most people still have to eat healthy whether or not they move more. Second, it undermines all the recent work that's been put into getting the message out about healthy diets.

Nestle's third reason -- and perhaps most important of all -- is that a that a shift away from healthy eating "declares victory prematurely" for food manufacturers and marketers. She cites an excerpt from Obama's speech: "Major food manufacturers are cutting sugar, salt and fat from their products. Restaurants are revamping kids' menus and loading them with healthier, fresher option." But as Nestle and others have observed, there have been many promises from food companies but little action.

"The political cost of fighting the food industry is surely the reason for the change in Mrs. Obama's rhetoric," asserted Nestle.

The White House's Let's Move senior policy advisor Sam Kass was quick to respond last week, saying that no pullback away from promoting healthy diets was planned. Instead, he said Obama's speech was intended to inform us about the campaign's expansion into another one of the program's five essential "pillars" which include: creating a healthy start for children; empowering parents and caregivers; providing healthy food in schools; improving access to healthy, affordable foods; and increasing physical activity.

Let's hope Kass' clarification of Obama's comments means that Let's Move is in fact looking to be more comprehensive and not selectively choosing to emphasize one "pillar" over another based on political expediency. As usual, Nestle says it best: "In the broader context of the Let's Move pillars, a focus on physical activity makes sense. It is an addition, not a substitution."

The last thing we need is to pit healthy eating against physical activity. As BMSG director Lori Dorfman and health advocate Toni Yancey pointed out in their 2009 article for Preventive Medicine: Good nutrition and regular physical activity are BOTH necessary for preventing chronic disease. Let's Move should not give up on holding the food industry accountable for selling junk food to children and families while working to keep Americans physically active.

Let's Movecampaign moving in the wrong direction? The First Lady recently announced that she will focus more on getting kids to be more active. Does this mean less time encouraging food companies to make healthier products for kids and stop marketing junk food to them?


Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) online marketing (1) food environment (1) Big Food (2) snap (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) genital warts (1) soda warning labels (1) cancer research (1) water security (1) white house (1) Michelle Obama (1) Coca-Cola (3) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Sam Kass (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) beauty products (1) sanitation (1) messaging (3) nonprofit communications (1) cap the tap (1) stigma (1) cannes lions festival (1) political correctness (1) violence prevention (8) violence (2) media (7) Bloomberg (3) tobacco industry (2) Joe Paterno (1) communication (2) Big Tobacco (3) election 2016 (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Oglala Sioux (3) community violence (1) food (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) prevention (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Happy Meals (1) media advocacy (23) prison phone calls (1) strategic communication (1) prison system (1) Catholic church (1) SB 402 (1) corporate social responsibility (1) gun control (2) children's health (3) American Beverage Association (1) california (1) social change (1) community health (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) childhood trauma (3) health equity (10) alcohol (5) obesity prevention (1) Let's Move (1) digital marketing (3) elephant triggers (1) education (1) breastfeeding (3) junk food marketing (4) auto safety (1) reproductive justice (1) summer camps (1) health care (1) social justice (2) gun violence (1) child sexual abuse (5) paper tigers (1) seat belt laws (1) community organizing (1) tobacco (5) childhood obesity (1) emergency contraception (1) george lakoff (1) suicide barrier (2) suicide nets (1) SSBs (1) food industry (4) structural racism (1) soda taxes (2) cosmetics (1) Nickelodeon (1) Penn State (3) ACEs (2) community (1) advocacy (3) filibuster (1) youth (1) sexual health (1) food deserts (1) Measure O (1) safety (1) marketing (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) HPV vaccine (1) Merck (1) beverage industry (2) Proposition 47 (1) liana winett (1) news coverage (1) social math (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Chile (1) gender (1) autism (1) Richmond (5) institutional accountability (1) news (2) paula deen (1) Texas (1) abortion (1) news monitoring (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Citizens United (1) SB-5 (1) communication strategy (1) public health (71) childhood adversity (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Aurora (1) sugary drinks (10) public health data (1) soda tax (11) Whiteclay (4) Connecticut shooting (1) Tea Party (1) Berkeley (2) inequities (1) tobacco control (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) journalism (1) Gardasil (1) San Francisco (3) soda (12) water (1) measure N (2) apha (3) Dora the Explorer (1) junk food (2) tobacco tax (1) personal responsibility (3) target marketing (9) values (1) cancer prevention (1) suicide prevention (2) world water day (1) authentic voices (1) Rachel Grana (1) language (6) obesity (10) equity (3) news strategy (1) racism (1) food justice (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) naacp (1) Colorado (1) community safety (1) regulation (2) framing (14) Proposition 29 (1) Wendy Davis (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) diabetes prevention (1) democracy (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) privilege (1) Big Soda (2) news analysis (3) environmental health (1) sexual violence (2) diabetes (1) government intrusion (1) race (1) sexism (2) physical activity (1) media bites (1) Telluride (1) mental health (2) choice (1) weight of the nation (1) Bill Cosby (1) PepsiCo (1) chronic disease (2) default frame (1) Donald Trump (2) women's health (2) cigarette advertising (1) healthy eating (1) McDonald's (1) vaccines (1) food marketing (5) ssb (1) new year's resolutions (1) Sandy Hook (2) nanny state (2) social media (2) sports drinks (1) El Monte (3) campaign finance (1) food swamps (1) food access (1) cervical cancer (1) product safety (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) public health policy (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Amanda Fallin (1) Twitter (1) FCC (1) collaboration (1) SB 1000 (1) Newtown (1) built environment (2) front groups (1) sandusky (2) soda industry (4) Marion Nestle (1) sexual assault (1) media analysis (6)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: