Wrong move for Let's Move?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Is Michelle Obama's

For supporters of a national policy to reduce the selling and marketing of junk food to kids -- among them noted healthy food advocate Marion Nestle -- this apparent shift in focus was more than disheartening. As Nestle points out, there are three main reasons this would be an unfortunate direction: First, a sole focus on physical activity negates the fact that to lose weight, most people still have to eat healthy whether or not they move more. Second, it undermines all the recent work that's been put into getting the message out about healthy diets.

Nestle's third reason -- and perhaps most important of all -- is that a that a shift away from healthy eating "declares victory prematurely" for food manufacturers and marketers. She cites an excerpt from Obama's speech: "Major food manufacturers are cutting sugar, salt and fat from their products. Restaurants are revamping kids' menus and loading them with healthier, fresher option." But as Nestle and others have observed, there have been many promises from food companies but little action.

"The political cost of fighting the food industry is surely the reason for the change in Mrs. Obama's rhetoric," asserted Nestle.

The White House's Let's Move senior policy advisor Sam Kass was quick to respond last week, saying that no pullback away from promoting healthy diets was planned. Instead, he said Obama's speech was intended to inform us about the campaign's expansion into another one of the program's five essential "pillars" which include: creating a healthy start for children; empowering parents and caregivers; providing healthy food in schools; improving access to healthy, affordable foods; and increasing physical activity.

Let's hope Kass' clarification of Obama's comments means that Let's Move is in fact looking to be more comprehensive and not selectively choosing to emphasize one "pillar" over another based on political expediency. As usual, Nestle says it best: "In the broader context of the Let's Move pillars, a focus on physical activity makes sense. It is an addition, not a substitution."

The last thing we need is to pit healthy eating against physical activity. As BMSG director Lori Dorfman and health advocate Toni Yancey pointed out in their 2009 article for Preventive Medicine: Good nutrition and regular physical activity are BOTH necessary for preventing chronic disease. Let's Move should not give up on holding the food industry accountable for selling junk food to children and families while working to keep Americans physically active.

Let's Movecampaign moving in the wrong direction? The First Lady recently announced that she will focus more on getting kids to be more active. Does this mean less time encouraging food companies to make healthier products for kids and stop marketing junk food to them?


healthy eating (1) prison system (1) institutional accountability (1) nanny state (2) framing (14) Donald Trump (2) indoor smoking ban (1) abortion (1) advocacy (3) diabetes prevention (1) gun violence (1) food (1) measure N (2) San Francisco (3) Chile (1) Amanda Fallin (1) collaboration (1) junk food (2) Rachel Grana (1) chronic disease (2) autism (1) childhood obesity (1) food deserts (1) beauty products (1) Colorado (1) American Beverage Association (1) weight of the nation (1) gatorade bolt game (1) political correctness (1) california (1) language (6) HPV vaccine (1) sexual violence (2) Bill Cosby (1) Michelle Obama (1) violence (2) food environment (1) food access (1) Oglala Sioux (3) water security (1) education (1) paper tigers (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) public health data (1) inequities (1) messaging (3) Let's Move (1) social math (1) auto safety (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) values (1) vaccines (1) community violence (1) naacp (1) Gardasil (1) race (1) food marketing (5) cap the tap (1) soda tax (11) marketing (1) new year's resolutions (1) community organizing (1) Catholic church (1) alcohol (5) Merck (1) regulation (2) tobacco industry (2) El Monte (3) beverage industry (2) Nickelodeon (1) PepsiCo (1) cancer prevention (1) news monitoring (1) online marketing (1) news analysis (3) media bites (1) public health policy (2) Measure O (1) Wendy Davis (1) media analysis (6) physical activity (1) Citizens United (1) Black Lives Matter (1) social media (2) SB-5 (1) Coca-Cola (3) childhood adversity (1) Sandy Hook (2) community (1) apha (3) reproductive justice (1) ssb (1) sanitation (1) Dora the Explorer (1) strategic communication (1) youth (1) personal responsibility (3) campaign finance (1) Proposition 29 (1) default frame (1) violence prevention (8) summer camps (1) prison phone calls (1) cigarette advertising (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Big Food (2) suicide barrier (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) media advocacy (23) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) gun control (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) food industry (4) built environment (2) Marion Nestle (1) target marketing (9) Golden Gate Bridge (2) emergency contraception (1) suicide prevention (2) social justice (2) suicide nets (1) McDonald's (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) filibuster (1) industry appeals to choice (1) liana winett (1) news coverage (1) media (7) junk food marketing to kids (2) health care (1) tobacco control (2) soda warning labels (1) gender (1) Richmond (5) elephant triggers (1) news strategy (1) sports drinks (1) white house (1) digital marketing (3) obesity (10) ACEs (2) childhood trauma (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Proposition 47 (1) Penn State (3) Happy Meals (1) sexual assault (1) food and beverage marketing (3) cancer research (1) privilege (1) water (1) Twitter (1) democracy (1) Connecticut shooting (1) journalism (1) news (2) breastfeeding (3) Texas (1) nonprofit communications (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) food justice (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) choice (1) front groups (1) food swamps (1) social change (1) Aurora (1) genital warts (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) child sexual abuse (5) sexual health (1) SSBs (1) FCC (1) product safety (1) stigma (1) sandusky (2) community health (1) world water day (1) SB 1000 (1) authentic voices (1) soda taxes (2) paula deen (1) government intrusion (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Whiteclay (4) sugary drinks (10) cosmetics (1) cannes lions festival (1) Joe Paterno (1) health equity (10) seat belt laws (1) junk food marketing (4) public health (71) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) environmental health (1) obesity prevention (1) election 2016 (1) soda (12) women's health (2) mental health (2) structural racism (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Bloomberg (3) diabetes (1) Telluride (1) racism (1) Sam Kass (1) Tea Party (1) cervical cancer (1) george lakoff (1) Berkeley (2) tobacco tax (1) soda industry (4) children's health (3) tobacco (5) Big Tobacco (3) communication (2) sexism (2) community safety (1) communication strategy (1) SB 402 (1) prevention (1) Newtown (1) equity (3) safety (1) Big Soda (2) snap (1) childhood obestiy conference (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: