Why we should stop using the word 'obesity'

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Quick, what image pops into your mind when you see or hear the word "obesity"? You think of a fat person, right? I know I do. I also know that I don't think of junk food or the industry that so heavily promotes it, even though they are a primary culprit behind America's rising rates of type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses.

Obesity is merely a symptom of a much bigger problem. Yet many of the very groups that are working hard to improve health equity by exposing the role of junk food marketing, income inequality, and other forces beyond individual control have nevertheless placed responsibility -- and shame -- for the country's growing waistlines and related health issues squarely on the shoulders of individuals. It's not intentional. But it happens every time we utter that all-too-familiar "O"-word.

This is a problem because once the conversation is framed in ways that highlight individuals, public health advocates must jump over even higher hurdles to show that we have a need for solutions beyond changes in individual behavior.

That's the trap that former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher and physician Pamela Peeke fell into in February when they debated law professor Paul Campos and TV host John Stossel in a panel called "Is Obesity The Government's Business?" Without saying a word, Satcher and Peeke started off at a disadvantage, given the title of the debate.

Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may have done themselves a disservice by framing their recent Weight of the Nation conference using words that focus on fat bodies, rather than on the unhealthy foods that saturate our surroundings or environments that impede physically activity. Genes and lifestyle aren't enough to explain the country's growing battles with food-related chronic illnesses. And even though the CDC ultimately wants to reframe the conversation to show this, approaching the issue with a focus on weight accomplishes just the opposite.

Airing tonight on HBO, a Weight of the Nation documentary series presented by the Institute of Medicine with the CDC and National Institutes of Health will no doubt face the same challenges.

Framing health issues in terms of obesity not only stigmatizes fat people, it also benefits the food industry. As public health lawyer Michele Simon writes, "[I]t is a problem food companies can supposedly help fix. They can market healthier foods! They can help fund playgrounds and exercise programs!" Ever notice how food companies don't shy away from the word? That itself should sound alarm bells for public health advocates.

Of course, avoiding the "O"-word is difficult even when we know it's problematic. BMSG discussed the trouble with using "obesity" as far back as 2006, yet we still find ourselves reaching for it from time to time.

To successfully reframe the issue will be challenging and may take more than a single word. Still, public health advocates should make it a priority to do so. After all, the people who control how a problem is framed have the best chance of influencing the solution. Public health advocates showed this to be true with tobacco when they stopped talking about smoking cessation and started talking about tobacco control. A small shift in language -- coupled with attention to the policies that shaped environments -- produced a big shift in the public's thinking so that we now see the problem as one related mostly to industry, not just individuals. With enough collaboration and creative thinking, public health can do the same with food.


child sexual abuse (5) gatorade bolt game (1) Whiteclay (4) digital marketing (3) structural racism (1) vaccines (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) language (6) PepsiCo (1) Black Lives Matter (1) mental health (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) obesity prevention (1) soda tax (11) Let's Move (1) news analysis (3) Big Tobacco (3) food (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) social change (1) Wendy Davis (1) Coca-Cola (3) food industry (4) Oglala Sioux (3) community (1) soda (12) children's health (3) apha (3) water (1) food justice (1) childhood adversity (1) environmental health (1) paper tigers (1) tobacco tax (1) new year's resolutions (1) race (1) racism (1) target marketing (9) San Francisco (3) gender (1) Rachel Grana (1) safety (1) media bites (1) SB 402 (1) democracy (1) Bloomberg (3) Catholic church (1) community organizing (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Richmond (5) public health (71) Big Food (2) george lakoff (1) food environment (1) Marion Nestle (1) prevention (1) community violence (1) suicide barrier (2) stigma (1) default frame (1) Texas (1) auto safety (1) journalism (1) personal responsibility (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) violence prevention (8) Pine Ridge reservation (1) public health policy (2) public health data (1) health equity (10) Telluride (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) food deserts (1) prison phone calls (1) physical activity (1) election 2016 (1) sexism (2) chronic disease (2) Newtown (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) communication (2) healthy eating (1) Penn State (3) industry appeals to choice (1) filibuster (1) education (1) reproductive justice (1) media advocacy (23) tobacco industry (2) privilege (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) choice (1) Chile (1) suicide nets (1) Donald Trump (2) childhood obesity (1) sexual violence (2) Nickelodeon (1) Bill Cosby (1) violence (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) beauty products (1) community health (1) media (7) El Monte (3) political correctness (1) food marketing (5) women's health (2) autism (1) food access (1) Gardasil (1) news (2) Tea Party (1) suicide prevention (2) water security (1) online marketing (1) liana winett (1) communication strategy (1) cannes lions festival (1) Amanda Fallin (1) nanny state (2) gun control (2) cancer prevention (1) world water day (1) soda taxes (2) junk food (2) genital warts (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Measure O (1) institutional accountability (1) authentic voices (1) food swamps (1) FCC (1) sanitation (1) strategic communication (1) childhood trauma (3) Merck (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Happy Meals (1) prison system (1) sports drinks (1) youth (1) nonprofit communications (1) alcohol (5) soda industry (4) built environment (2) news strategy (1) values (1) tobacco (5) Connecticut shooting (1) SB 1000 (1) food and beverage marketing (3) sexual health (1) inequities (1) Joe Paterno (1) equity (3) breastfeeding (3) government intrusion (1) SB-5 (1) sugary drinks (10) naacp (1) beverage industry (2) Proposition 29 (1) california (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) cap the tap (1) Colorado (1) community safety (1) junk food marketing (4) gun violence (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) collaboration (1) Michelle Obama (1) indoor smoking ban (1) cervical cancer (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) sandusky (2) campaign finance (1) sexual assault (1) advocacy (3) soda warning labels (1) social media (2) Citizens United (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) social justice (2) Twitter (1) Aurora (1) product safety (1) abortion (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) emergency contraception (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) marketing (1) diabetes prevention (1) obesity (10) Sandy Hook (2) front groups (1) snap (1) American Beverage Association (1) cigarette advertising (1) news monitoring (1) Sam Kass (1) cancer research (1) SSBs (1) tobacco control (2) ssb (1) framing (14) summer camps (1) news coverage (1) paula deen (1) McDonald's (1) ACEs (2) Berkeley (2) regulation (2) diabetes (1) white house (1) social math (1) weight of the nation (1) health care (1) messaging (3) HPV vaccine (1) elephant triggers (1) Proposition 47 (1) measure N (2) Big Soda (2) seat belt laws (1) cosmetics (1) media analysis (6)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: