Why we should stop using the word 'obesity'

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Quick, what image pops into your mind when you see or hear the word "obesity"? You think of a fat person, right? I know I do. I also know that I don't think of junk food or the industry that so heavily promotes it, even though they are a primary culprit behind America's rising rates of type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses.

Obesity is merely a symptom of a much bigger problem. Yet many of the very groups that are working hard to improve health equity by exposing the role of junk food marketing, income inequality, and other forces beyond individual control have nevertheless placed responsibility -- and shame -- for the country's growing waistlines and related health issues squarely on the shoulders of individuals. It's not intentional. But it happens every time we utter that all-too-familiar "O"-word.

This is a problem because once the conversation is framed in ways that highlight individuals, public health advocates must jump over even higher hurdles to show that we have a need for solutions beyond changes in individual behavior.

That's the trap that former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher and physician Pamela Peeke fell into in February when they debated law professor Paul Campos and TV host John Stossel in a panel called "Is Obesity The Government's Business?" Without saying a word, Satcher and Peeke started off at a disadvantage, given the title of the debate.

Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may have done themselves a disservice by framing their recent Weight of the Nation conference using words that focus on fat bodies, rather than on the unhealthy foods that saturate our surroundings or environments that impede physically activity. Genes and lifestyle aren't enough to explain the country's growing battles with food-related chronic illnesses. And even though the CDC ultimately wants to reframe the conversation to show this, approaching the issue with a focus on weight accomplishes just the opposite.

Airing tonight on HBO, a Weight of the Nation documentary series presented by the Institute of Medicine with the CDC and National Institutes of Health will no doubt face the same challenges.

Framing health issues in terms of obesity not only stigmatizes fat people, it also benefits the food industry. As public health lawyer Michele Simon writes, "[I]t is a problem food companies can supposedly help fix. They can market healthier foods! They can help fund playgrounds and exercise programs!" Ever notice how food companies don't shy away from the word? That itself should sound alarm bells for public health advocates.

Of course, avoiding the "O"-word is difficult even when we know it's problematic. BMSG discussed the trouble with using "obesity" as far back as 2006, yet we still find ourselves reaching for it from time to time.

To successfully reframe the issue will be challenging and may take more than a single word. Still, public health advocates should make it a priority to do so. After all, the people who control how a problem is framed have the best chance of influencing the solution. Public health advocates showed this to be true with tobacco when they stopped talking about smoking cessation and started talking about tobacco control. A small shift in language -- coupled with attention to the policies that shaped environments -- produced a big shift in the public's thinking so that we now see the problem as one related mostly to industry, not just individuals. With enough collaboration and creative thinking, public health can do the same with food.

McDonald's (1) gun control (2) Sam Kass (1) measure N (2) Measure O (1) online marketing (1) childhood adversity (1) framing (14) Big Food (2) PepsiCo (1) women's health (2) health care (1) Wendy Davis (1) environmental health (1) diabetes prevention (1) suicide nets (1) Merck (1) alcohol (5) filibuster (1) Let's Move (1) messaging (3) cap the tap (1) Coca-Cola (3) news analysis (3) healthy eating (1) community organizing (1) sexism (2) sexual violence (2) food industry (4) communication strategy (1) journalism (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) product safety (1) Whiteclay (4) Sandy Hook (2) indoor smoking ban (1) childhood trauma (3) news coverage (1) prevention (1) front groups (1) privilege (1) El Monte (3) sugary drinks (10) choice (1) ssb (1) seat belt laws (1) Twitter (1) Nickelodeon (1) george lakoff (1) cannes lions festival (1) digital marketing (3) water (1) violence prevention (8) cancer research (1) strategic communication (1) Aurora (1) food justice (1) food environment (1) Bill Cosby (1) Chile (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) youth (1) childhood obesity (1) race (1) stigma (1) suicide barrier (2) summer camps (1) weight of the nation (1) social media (2) SSBs (1) food marketing (5) autism (1) equity (3) institutional accountability (1) media (7) gatorade bolt game (1) soda taxes (2) SB 1000 (1) sanitation (1) Citizens United (1) soda tax (11) news monitoring (1) food deserts (1) california (1) public health data (1) children's health (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) government intrusion (1) community health (1) Gardasil (1) American Beverage Association (1) media analysis (6) Penn State (3) Colorado (1) water security (1) community (1) auto safety (1) beauty products (1) Black Lives Matter (1) prison system (1) food access (1) election 2016 (1) food (1) soda warning labels (1) Bloomberg (3) elephant triggers (1) Proposition 29 (1) language (6) Catholic church (1) communication (2) target marketing (9) inequities (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) democracy (1) social justice (2) SB-5 (1) tobacco control (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) cancer prevention (1) social change (1) public health (71) beverage industry (2) food and beverage marketing (3) junk food (2) racism (1) gender (1) values (1) Marion Nestle (1) collaboration (1) regulation (2) breastfeeding (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) FCC (1) soda (12) diabetes (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) political correctness (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Donald Trump (2) naacp (1) Michelle Obama (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) paper tigers (1) gun violence (1) abortion (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Amanda Fallin (1) personal responsibility (3) soda industry (4) Connecticut shooting (1) physical activity (1) health equity (10) Proposition 47 (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) obesity prevention (1) cosmetics (1) emergency contraception (1) liana winett (1) white house (1) education (1) marketing (1) Berkeley (2) snap (1) advocacy (3) San Francisco (3) sexual assault (1) Rachel Grana (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) community violence (1) nonprofit communications (1) media bites (1) authentic voices (1) news (2) Big Soda (2) Telluride (1) HPV vaccine (1) food swamps (1) reproductive justice (1) cigarette advertising (1) Joe Paterno (1) world water day (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) genital warts (1) public health policy (2) default frame (1) Newtown (1) sports drinks (1) Richmond (5) industry appeals to choice (1) SB 402 (1) new year's resolutions (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Texas (1) obesity (10) media advocacy (23) tobacco industry (2) campaign finance (1) cervical cancer (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) apha (3) suicide prevention (2) sexual health (1) mental health (2) prison phone calls (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) nanny state (2) chronic disease (2) vaccines (1) structural racism (1) Big Tobacco (3) Dora the Explorer (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) safety (1) paula deen (1) Happy Meals (1) tobacco tax (1) violence (2) news strategy (1) social math (1) ACEs (2) sandusky (2) community safety (1) Tea Party (1) corporate social responsibility (1) tobacco (5) built environment (2) child sexual abuse (5) junk food marketing (4)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: