Why we should stop using the word 'obesity'

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Quick, what image pops into your mind when you see or hear the word "obesity"? You think of a fat person, right? I know I do. I also know that I don't think of junk food or the industry that so heavily promotes it, even though they are a primary culprit behind America's rising rates of type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses.

Obesity is merely a symptom of a much bigger problem. Yet many of the very groups that are working hard to improve health equity by exposing the role of junk food marketing, income inequality, and other forces beyond individual control have nevertheless placed responsibility -- and shame -- for the country's growing waistlines and related health issues squarely on the shoulders of individuals. It's not intentional. But it happens every time we utter that all-too-familiar "O"-word.

This is a problem because once the conversation is framed in ways that highlight individuals, public health advocates must jump over even higher hurdles to show that we have a need for solutions beyond changes in individual behavior.

That's the trap that former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher and physician Pamela Peeke fell into in February when they debated law professor Paul Campos and TV host John Stossel in a panel called "Is Obesity The Government's Business?" Without saying a word, Satcher and Peeke started off at a disadvantage, given the title of the debate.

Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may have done themselves a disservice by framing their recent Weight of the Nation conference using words that focus on fat bodies, rather than on the unhealthy foods that saturate our surroundings or environments that impede physically activity. Genes and lifestyle aren't enough to explain the country's growing battles with food-related chronic illnesses. And even though the CDC ultimately wants to reframe the conversation to show this, approaching the issue with a focus on weight accomplishes just the opposite.

Airing tonight on HBO, a Weight of the Nation documentary series presented by the Institute of Medicine with the CDC and National Institutes of Health will no doubt face the same challenges.

Framing health issues in terms of obesity not only stigmatizes fat people, it also benefits the food industry. As public health lawyer Michele Simon writes, "[I]t is a problem food companies can supposedly help fix. They can market healthier foods! They can help fund playgrounds and exercise programs!" Ever notice how food companies don't shy away from the word? That itself should sound alarm bells for public health advocates.

Of course, avoiding the "O"-word is difficult even when we know it's problematic. BMSG discussed the trouble with using "obesity" as far back as 2006, yet we still find ourselves reaching for it from time to time.

To successfully reframe the issue will be challenging and may take more than a single word. Still, public health advocates should make it a priority to do so. After all, the people who control how a problem is framed have the best chance of influencing the solution. Public health advocates showed this to be true with tobacco when they stopped talking about smoking cessation and started talking about tobacco control. A small shift in language -- coupled with attention to the policies that shaped environments -- produced a big shift in the public's thinking so that we now see the problem as one related mostly to industry, not just individuals. With enough collaboration and creative thinking, public health can do the same with food.

industry appeals to choice (1) cigarette advertising (1) cervical cancer (1) george lakoff (1) sugary drinks (10) food marketing (4) Merck (1) Connecticut shooting (1) prevention (1) white house (1) food deserts (1) cosmetics (1) paper tigers (1) food industry (4) McDonald's (1) Sandy Hook (2) authentic voices (1) california (1) corporate social responsibility (1) indoor smoking ban (1) race (1) beverage industry (2) regulation (2) SB 402 (1) news coverage (1) digital marketing (2) media analysis (6) built environment (2) Big Food (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) sandusky (2) children's health (3) Dora the Explorer (1) Donald Trump (2) SSBs (1) sexual health (1) health care (1) alcohol (5) weight of the nation (1) personal responsibility (3) Happy Meals (1) Berkeley (2) political correctness (1) mental health (2) Twitter (1) diabetes prevention (1) obesity prevention (1) food justice (1) food access (1) Aurora (1) news strategy (1) world water day (1) chronic disease (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) childhood adversity (1) violence (2) childhood obesity (1) food environment (1) auto safety (1) Newtown (1) collaboration (1) soda tax (11) Nickelodeon (1) Texas (1) suicide barrier (2) community safety (1) social media (2) public health (70) prison phone calls (1) Whiteclay (4) front groups (1) SB 1000 (1) privilege (1) PepsiCo (1) sexism (2) soda warning labels (1) gender (1) language (6) soda industry (4) strategic communication (1) tobacco (5) naacp (1) stigma (1) childhood trauma (3) Bloomberg (3) physical activity (1) Bill Cosby (1) messaging (3) FCC (1) Colorado (1) apha (3) structural racism (1) reproductive justice (1) media bites (1) communication (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) racism (1) safety (1) food (1) values (1) Oglala Sioux (3) advocacy (3) Measure O (1) framing (14) water security (1) cancer research (1) Sam Kass (1) social justice (2) campaign finance (1) breastfeeding (3) gatorade bolt game (1) Penn State (3) default frame (1) Telluride (1) election 2016 (1) tobacco industry (2) target marketing (8) gun control (2) nanny state (2) sexual violence (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) communication strategy (1) abortion (1) healthy eating (1) inequities (1) social math (1) elephant triggers (1) Wendy Davis (1) snap (1) new year's resolutions (1) autism (1) Let's Move (1) social change (1) Rachel Grana (1) Gardasil (1) environmental health (1) junk food marketing (4) food swamps (1) tobacco control (2) public health data (1) youth (1) public health policy (2) community organizing (1) media (7) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) vaccines (1) SB-5 (1) choice (1) marketing (1) cannes lions festival (1) El Monte (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Richmond (5) Proposition 47 (1) obesity (10) genital warts (1) junk food (2) liana winett (1) sports drinks (1) summer camps (1) violence prevention (8) diabetes (1) community violence (1) Joe Paterno (1) Coca-Cola (3) Catholic church (1) food and beverage marketing (3) prison system (1) seat belt laws (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Marion Nestle (1) Michelle Obama (1) Citizens United (1) measure N (2) suicide nets (1) online marketing (1) paula deen (1) emergency contraception (1) community (1) journalism (1) equity (3) sanitation (1) Proposition 29 (1) Black Lives Matter (1) child sexual abuse (5) news monitoring (1) news analysis (3) soda taxes (2) Big Tobacco (3) ssb (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) sexual assault (1) soda (12) democracy (1) suicide prevention (2) education (1) women's health (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) San Francisco (3) Chile (1) beauty products (1) product safety (1) health equity (10) media advocacy (23) Tea Party (1) gun violence (1) community health (1) Big Soda (2) cap the tap (1) cancer prevention (1) tobacco tax (1) HPV vaccine (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Amanda Fallin (1) filibuster (1) American Beverage Association (1) water (1) news (2) ACEs (2) government intrusion (1) nonprofit communications (1) institutional accountability (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: