What's really behind the soda industry's 'choice' rhetoric

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last week, following New York City's public hearing on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposal to cap soda sizes at 16 ounces, industry reps and other critics pushed back hard, saying the ban on large portions "restricts choice." The trouble is, those critics don't explain whose choice is really being restricted. And that's because the answer is soda companies'.

Soda companies have long enjoyed extensive freedom over what products they create, market and sell, regardless of the social cost of their choices. In the 1950s, they chose to bottle their sugary beverages in 6.5-ounce containers, touting them as an occasional treat. Today, soda companies choose to inflate portions to 20 ounces and beyond, pushing sales of these oversized drinks by making sure they are cheap and always within arms' reach. Soda companies choose to continually expand their product lines, creating sugar-infused teas and sugary sports drinks; they've even added sugar and calories to water, in spite of research that links sugar-laden beverages to chronic health problems like diabetes and heart disease. They choose to market these unhealthy products disproportionately to low-income communities, communities of color, and youth. And now, in the face of growing public criticism, soda companies are choosing to borrow marketing tactics from the tobacco industry to improve their image and avoid government regulation.

So when soda industry spokespeople and executives argue that Bloomberg's proposal restricts choice, they need to be specific. It restricts industry's choice. It forces soda companies to be accountable to the public, rather than freely allowed to exploit the public. And it puts the public's health ahead of profits, taking a little power away from major corporations and putting it back in the hands of ordinary people.

The public's response to Bloomberg's proposal suggests this shift in power is exactly what people want. According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, of the 38,000 written comments the department received regarding the proposal, 32,000 were in support. Looks like people are seeing soda companies' "choice" rhetoric for what it really is: a thinly veiled scare tactic.


food and beverage marketing (3) Texas (1) San Francisco (3) gender (1) product safety (1) front groups (1) stigma (1) food swamps (1) prevention (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) cosmetics (1) inequities (1) Bill Cosby (1) sexism (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) built environment (2) nanny state (2) news analysis (2) seat belt laws (1) naacp (1) Proposition 47 (1) Michelle Obama (1) gun control (2) Telluride (1) sugary drinks (10) youth (1) HPV vaccine (1) filibuster (1) messaging (3) media (7) indoor smoking ban (1) Wendy Davis (1) Merck (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Measure O (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) PepsiCo (1) obesity (10) tobacco control (2) racism (1) community organizing (1) white house (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) alcohol (5) paula deen (1) diabetes (1) privilege (1) violence prevention (8) race (1) junk food (2) environmental health (1) news coverage (1) SB-5 (1) food marketing (3) news (2) El Monte (3) Oglala Sioux (3) water security (1) soda industry (4) Let's Move (1) prison phone calls (1) emergency contraception (1) choice (1) media analysis (5) McDonald's (1) framing (14) Big Food (2) authentic voices (1) liana winett (1) election 2016 (1) food (1) sports drinks (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) tobacco (5) news monitoring (1) political correctness (1) regulation (2) autism (1) Twitter (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) government intrusion (1) mental health (2) Tea Party (1) Donald Trump (2) obesity prevention (1) george lakoff (1) suicide prevention (2) Colorado (1) institutional accountability (1) SB 402 (1) industry appeals to choice (1) junk food marketing (3) snap (1) Catholic church (1) beauty products (1) beverage industry (2) social justice (1) Happy Meals (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) campaign finance (1) Amanda Fallin (1) values (1) Coca-Cola (3) sandusky (2) health care (1) Richmond (5) summer camps (1) Joe Paterno (1) suicide barrier (2) ssb (1) Proposition 29 (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Big Soda (2) equity (3) abortion (1) measure N (2) Penn State (3) food environment (1) tobacco tax (1) Sam Kass (1) Connecticut shooting (1) ACEs (2) Whiteclay (4) children's health (3) tobacco industry (2) target marketing (7) collaboration (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food deserts (1) childhood trauma (3) cap the tap (1) personal responsibility (3) prison system (1) world water day (1) democracy (1) American Beverage Association (1) food industry (4) online marketing (1) soda taxes (2) social change (1) soda (12) childhood obesity (1) childhood adversity (1) Nickelodeon (1) gun violence (1) food justice (1) social media (2) cancer prevention (1) cervical cancer (1) Big Tobacco (3) social math (1) new year's resolutions (1) health equity (10) chronic disease (2) food access (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) water (1) Chile (1) digital marketing (2) weight of the nation (1) community safety (1) sanitation (1) corporate social responsibility (1) california (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) language (6) sexual violence (2) Gardasil (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) news strategy (1) auto safety (1) media bites (1) Aurora (1) Bloomberg (3) public health policy (2) marketing (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) education (1) structural racism (1) Sandy Hook (2) gatorade bolt game (1) sexual health (1) advocacy (3) public health (66) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) soda warning labels (1) default frame (1) media advocacy (21) journalism (1) paper tigers (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) community violence (1) elephant triggers (1) Dora the Explorer (1) breastfeeding (3) sexual assault (1) Rachel Grana (1) suicide nets (1) public health data (1) apha (2) communication (2) physical activity (1) genital warts (1) SB 1000 (1) FCC (1) healthy eating (1) diabetes prevention (1) child sexual abuse (5) reproductive justice (1) cigarette advertising (1) women's health (2) violence (1) SSBs (1) Marion Nestle (1) Citizens United (1) vaccines (1) Newtown (1) cancer research (1) community health (1) soda tax (11) Berkeley (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: