What's really behind the soda industry's 'choice' rhetoric

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last week, following New York City's public hearing on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposal to cap soda sizes at 16 ounces, industry reps and other critics pushed back hard, saying the ban on large portions "restricts choice." The trouble is, those critics don't explain whose choice is really being restricted. And that's because the answer is soda companies'.

Soda companies have long enjoyed extensive freedom over what products they create, market and sell, regardless of the social cost of their choices. In the 1950s, they chose to bottle their sugary beverages in 6.5-ounce containers, touting them as an occasional treat. Today, soda companies choose to inflate portions to 20 ounces and beyond, pushing sales of these oversized drinks by making sure they are cheap and always within arms' reach. Soda companies choose to continually expand their product lines, creating sugar-infused teas and sugary sports drinks; they've even added sugar and calories to water, in spite of research that links sugar-laden beverages to chronic health problems like diabetes and heart disease. They choose to market these unhealthy products disproportionately to low-income communities, communities of color, and youth. And now, in the face of growing public criticism, soda companies are choosing to borrow marketing tactics from the tobacco industry to improve their image and avoid government regulation.

So when soda industry spokespeople and executives argue that Bloomberg's proposal restricts choice, they need to be specific. It restricts industry's choice. It forces soda companies to be accountable to the public, rather than freely allowed to exploit the public. And it puts the public's health ahead of profits, taking a little power away from major corporations and putting it back in the hands of ordinary people.

The public's response to Bloomberg's proposal suggests this shift in power is exactly what people want. According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, of the 38,000 written comments the department received regarding the proposal, 32,000 were in support. Looks like people are seeing soda companies' "choice" rhetoric for what it really is: a thinly veiled scare tactic.


political correctness (1) Newtown (1) safety (1) digital marketing (2) Rachel Grana (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Telluride (1) race (1) health equity (10) Connecticut shooting (1) stigma (1) Bloomberg (3) physical activity (1) public health (67) equity (3) tobacco industry (2) diabetes prevention (1) American Beverage Association (1) Catholic church (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Colorado (1) paula deen (1) food environment (1) SSBs (1) gender (1) nanny state (2) Berkeley (2) Wendy Davis (1) child sexual abuse (5) institutional accountability (1) product safety (1) prison phone calls (1) sexual health (1) Marion Nestle (1) HPV vaccine (1) public health data (1) cervical cancer (1) food marketing (3) election 2016 (1) education (1) communication (2) obesity prevention (1) violence (2) news (2) Proposition 47 (1) weight of the nation (1) cigarette advertising (1) news monitoring (1) beauty products (1) sandusky (2) Measure O (1) childhood trauma (3) authentic voices (1) food deserts (1) seat belt laws (1) obesity (10) elephant triggers (1) tobacco control (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) apha (2) McDonald's (1) regulation (2) prison system (1) tobacco tax (1) community violence (1) women's health (2) healthy eating (1) news strategy (1) filibuster (1) george lakoff (1) community health (1) gun violence (1) reproductive justice (1) campaign finance (1) childhood adversity (1) Sandy Hook (2) auto safety (1) water security (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sexual violence (2) media analysis (5) privilege (1) Chile (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Big Food (2) ACEs (2) measure N (2) language (6) messaging (3) suicide barrier (2) San Francisco (3) vaccines (1) social math (1) ssb (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Tea Party (1) health care (1) Big Soda (2) alcohol (5) news analysis (3) choice (1) suicide nets (1) media advocacy (21) childhood obestiy conference (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) california (1) target marketing (7) Johnson & Johnson (1) El Monte (3) genital warts (1) structural racism (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) gatorade bolt game (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Black Lives Matter (1) water (1) snap (1) online marketing (1) sugary drinks (10) SB-5 (1) Richmond (5) racism (1) front groups (1) marketing (1) chronic disease (2) journalism (1) Proposition 29 (1) Coca-Cola (3) food access (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) social change (1) Texas (1) SB 1000 (1) collaboration (1) Penn State (3) Sam Kass (1) Dora the Explorer (1) community organizing (1) personal responsibility (3) Aurora (1) cancer research (1) sexism (2) environmental health (1) diabetes (1) values (1) naacp (1) corporate social responsibility (1) suicide prevention (2) liana winett (1) Big Tobacco (3) sanitation (1) white house (1) Twitter (1) social media (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) emergency contraception (1) Whiteclay (4) children's health (3) Bill Cosby (1) cancer prevention (1) indoor smoking ban (1) world water day (1) food (1) food justice (1) Nickelodeon (1) community (1) Oglala Sioux (3) beverage industry (2) Happy Meals (1) public health policy (2) junk food marketing (3) government intrusion (1) democracy (1) Let's Move (1) Merck (1) autism (1) news coverage (1) food industry (4) soda industry (4) advocacy (3) gun control (2) soda tax (11) violence prevention (8) built environment (2) youth (1) framing (14) social justice (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) summer camps (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) new year's resolutions (1) PepsiCo (1) junk food (2) cap the tap (1) food swamps (1) breastfeeding (3) sports drinks (1) abortion (1) inequities (1) paper tigers (1) community safety (1) mental health (2) soda taxes (2) childhood obesity (1) Joe Paterno (1) SB 402 (1) cosmetics (1) sexual assault (1) tobacco (5) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) media bites (1) prevention (1) media (7) industry appeals to choice (1) soda (12) Donald Trump (2) FCC (1) soda warning labels (1) Gardasil (1) Michelle Obama (1) default frame (1) Citizens United (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: