What's really behind the soda industry's 'choice' rhetoric

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last week, following New York City's public hearing on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposal to cap soda sizes at 16 ounces, industry reps and other critics pushed back hard, saying the ban on large portions "restricts choice." The trouble is, those critics don't explain whose choice is really being restricted. And that's because the answer is soda companies'.

Soda companies have long enjoyed extensive freedom over what products they create, market and sell, regardless of the social cost of their choices. In the 1950s, they chose to bottle their sugary beverages in 6.5-ounce containers, touting them as an occasional treat. Today, soda companies choose to inflate portions to 20 ounces and beyond, pushing sales of these oversized drinks by making sure they are cheap and always within arms' reach. Soda companies choose to continually expand their product lines, creating sugar-infused teas and sugary sports drinks; they've even added sugar and calories to water, in spite of research that links sugar-laden beverages to chronic health problems like diabetes and heart disease. They choose to market these unhealthy products disproportionately to low-income communities, communities of color, and youth. And now, in the face of growing public criticism, soda companies are choosing to borrow marketing tactics from the tobacco industry to improve their image and avoid government regulation.

So when soda industry spokespeople and executives argue that Bloomberg's proposal restricts choice, they need to be specific. It restricts industry's choice. It forces soda companies to be accountable to the public, rather than freely allowed to exploit the public. And it puts the public's health ahead of profits, taking a little power away from major corporations and putting it back in the hands of ordinary people.

The public's response to Bloomberg's proposal suggests this shift in power is exactly what people want. According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, of the 38,000 written comments the department received regarding the proposal, 32,000 were in support. Looks like people are seeing soda companies' "choice" rhetoric for what it really is: a thinly veiled scare tactic.


choice (1) race (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) strategic communication (1) messaging (3) news analysis (3) filibuster (1) suicide barrier (2) social media (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) Big Soda (2) water security (1) political correctness (1) news strategy (1) news monitoring (1) Marion Nestle (1) water (1) childhood trauma (3) california (1) SB 402 (1) alcohol (5) prevention (1) sports drinks (1) soda tax (11) gun control (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) San Francisco (3) mental health (2) institutional accountability (1) public health policy (2) journalism (1) indoor smoking ban (1) abortion (1) paper tigers (1) health equity (10) sexual violence (2) suicide nets (1) soda taxes (2) safety (1) front groups (1) paula deen (1) digital marketing (3) world water day (1) auto safety (1) structural racism (1) framing (14) snap (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) authentic voices (1) democracy (1) built environment (2) food swamps (1) Richmond (5) Amanda Fallin (1) new year's resolutions (1) seat belt laws (1) community violence (1) media analysis (6) Nickelodeon (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Newtown (1) social change (1) Proposition 47 (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) prison phone calls (1) food industry (4) Merck (1) tobacco control (2) Catholic church (1) soda warning labels (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) public health data (1) Penn State (3) social math (1) HPV vaccine (1) inequities (1) Whiteclay (4) community safety (1) liana winett (1) corporate social responsibility (1) government intrusion (1) sugary drinks (10) communication strategy (1) Bill Cosby (1) default frame (1) Dora the Explorer (1) language (6) collaboration (1) food and beverage marketing (3) health care (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) gatorade bolt game (1) SB 1000 (1) food environment (1) food (1) community (1) product safety (1) Joe Paterno (1) summer camps (1) diabetes (1) gun violence (1) Gardasil (1) vaccines (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) cigarette advertising (1) PepsiCo (1) Rachel Grana (1) autism (1) campaign finance (1) food justice (1) news (2) youth (1) SSBs (1) equity (3) Aurora (1) Donald Trump (2) sexual assault (1) measure N (2) Chile (1) El Monte (3) Happy Meals (1) Twitter (1) FCC (1) sexism (2) violence prevention (8) tobacco (5) reproductive justice (1) tobacco industry (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) suicide prevention (2) cancer research (1) Telluride (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Let's Move (1) ACEs (2) stigma (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) ssb (1) weight of the nation (1) cap the tap (1) Coca-Cola (3) sandusky (2) Big Tobacco (3) Sam Kass (1) cancer prevention (1) elephant triggers (1) racism (1) industry appeals to choice (1) chronic disease (2) Big Food (2) sexual health (1) junk food marketing (4) community health (1) advocacy (3) women's health (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Proposition 29 (1) george lakoff (1) McDonald's (1) white house (1) emergency contraception (1) Citizens United (1) physical activity (1) cannes lions festival (1) genital warts (1) media bites (1) child sexual abuse (5) regulation (2) cosmetics (1) beauty products (1) SB-5 (1) target marketing (9) children's health (3) healthy eating (1) online marketing (1) environmental health (1) values (1) apha (3) education (1) Texas (1) obesity prevention (1) media (7) personal responsibility (3) soda industry (4) naacp (1) obesity (10) social justice (2) news coverage (1) prison system (1) Tea Party (1) soda (12) Wendy Davis (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) marketing (1) beverage industry (2) communication (2) cervical cancer (1) community organizing (1) childhood adversity (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) tobacco tax (1) diabetes prevention (1) privilege (1) food access (1) nanny state (2) public health (71) Colorado (1) nonprofit communications (1) Michelle Obama (1) Bloomberg (3) violence (2) American Beverage Association (1) food deserts (1) sanitation (1) election 2016 (1) Sandy Hook (2) Black Lives Matter (1) breastfeeding (3) food marketing (5) Berkeley (2) Oglala Sioux (3) childhood obesity (1) media advocacy (23) gender (1) Measure O (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) junk food (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: