What's really behind the soda industry's 'choice' rhetoric

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last week, following New York City's public hearing on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposal to cap soda sizes at 16 ounces, industry reps and other critics pushed back hard, saying the ban on large portions "restricts choice." The trouble is, those critics don't explain whose choice is really being restricted. And that's because the answer is soda companies'.

Soda companies have long enjoyed extensive freedom over what products they create, market and sell, regardless of the social cost of their choices. In the 1950s, they chose to bottle their sugary beverages in 6.5-ounce containers, touting them as an occasional treat. Today, soda companies choose to inflate portions to 20 ounces and beyond, pushing sales of these oversized drinks by making sure they are cheap and always within arms' reach. Soda companies choose to continually expand their product lines, creating sugar-infused teas and sugary sports drinks; they've even added sugar and calories to water, in spite of research that links sugar-laden beverages to chronic health problems like diabetes and heart disease. They choose to market these unhealthy products disproportionately to low-income communities, communities of color, and youth. And now, in the face of growing public criticism, soda companies are choosing to borrow marketing tactics from the tobacco industry to improve their image and avoid government regulation.

So when soda industry spokespeople and executives argue that Bloomberg's proposal restricts choice, they need to be specific. It restricts industry's choice. It forces soda companies to be accountable to the public, rather than freely allowed to exploit the public. And it puts the public's health ahead of profits, taking a little power away from major corporations and putting it back in the hands of ordinary people.

The public's response to Bloomberg's proposal suggests this shift in power is exactly what people want. According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, of the 38,000 written comments the department received regarding the proposal, 32,000 were in support. Looks like people are seeing soda companies' "choice" rhetoric for what it really is: a thinly veiled scare tactic.


Tea Party (1) food justice (1) suicide prevention (2) Michelle Obama (1) cigarette advertising (1) stigma (1) cap the tap (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) suicide barrier (2) george lakoff (1) American Beverage Association (1) FCC (1) Berkeley (2) food marketing (3) Connecticut shooting (1) sanitation (1) vaccines (1) Colorado (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Bill Cosby (1) Measure O (1) public health data (1) media advocacy (18) Wendy Davis (1) emergency contraception (1) social math (1) equity (3) front groups (1) sandusky (2) Nickelodeon (1) public health policy (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) tobacco tax (1) community violence (1) target marketing (7) violence (1) news coverage (1) McDonald's (1) chronic disease (2) california (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) youth (1) beauty products (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) new year's resolutions (1) inequities (1) online marketing (1) snap (1) soda tax (11) Bloomberg (3) Penn State (3) media bites (1) violence prevention (6) Citizens United (1) San Francisco (3) child sexual abuse (5) abortion (1) junk food marketing (3) autism (1) privilege (1) gun control (2) institutional accountability (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) tobacco (4) soda industry (4) SB 1000 (1) gender (1) cosmetics (1) community safety (1) seat belt laws (1) apha (1) prison system (1) government intrusion (1) SSBs (1) gatorade bolt game (1) beverage industry (1) healthy eating (1) values (1) industry appeals to choice (1) childhood obesity (1) diabetes (1) framing (11) environmental health (1) ssb (1) naacp (1) water (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Richmond (5) media (5) collaboration (1) Sam Kass (1) adverse childhood experiences (2) social change (1) news analysis (1) SB-5 (1) sugary drinks (9) digital marketing (2) sexism (1) community health (1) Happy Meals (1) children's health (3) campaign finance (1) physical activity (1) diabetes prevention (1) food environment (1) messaging (3) white house (1) measure N (2) social justice (1) social media (2) Chile (1) weight of the nation (1) prison phone calls (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) structural racism (1) Texas (1) Newtown (1) choice (1) summer camps (1) Let's Move (1) Aurora (1) food access (1) Big Soda (2) cervical cancer (1) Sandy Hook (2) breastfeeding (3) marketing (1) water security (1) nanny state (2) media analysis (3) women's health (2) alcohol (4) Pine Ridge reservation (1) regulation (2) prevention (1) obesity (9) Big Tobacco (3) sexual assault (1) Whiteclay (4) SB 402 (1) food industry (2) filibuster (1) advocacy (3) childhood trauma (2) Amanda Fallin (1) Gardasil (1) liana winett (1) Telluride (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) elephant triggers (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Joe Paterno (1) Proposition 29 (1) HPV vaccine (1) suicide nets (1) communication (2) corporate social responsibility (1) race (1) cancer prevention (1) childhood adversity (1) Rachel Grana (1) product safety (1) health care (1) Marion Nestle (1) indoor smoking ban (1) personal responsibility (3) Twitter (1) junk food (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) built environment (2) tobacco control (2) food (1) health equity (9) mental health (2) soda warning labels (1) education (1) sports drinks (1) food and beverage marketing (3) cancer research (1) Oglala Sioux (3) sexual violence (1) genital warts (1) Merck (1) paula deen (1) news strategy (1) public health (59) food deserts (1) auto safety (1) Big Food (2) sexual health (1) language (6) Coca-Cola (3) PepsiCo (1) obesity prevention (1) tobacco industry (2) news (2) default frame (1) gun violence (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Catholic church (1) soda (12) reproductive justice (1) El Monte (3) food swamps (1) world water day (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) ACEs (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: