What's missing from news coverage of violence?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

This summer, we witnessed the murders of unarmed black men by police across the United States and the frustration, grief and righteous anger that ensued as a result. Using social media, communities effectively captured the emotion and response to the violence and injustice embedded in policing tactics, moving the country to a national dialogue surrounding one of America's toughest questions: How do we address violence and the complex social and environmental factors surrounding it?

News coverage of crime and violence is an important venue for our society to answer that question. But research has shown that, historically, crime stories have largely neglected to include the community conditions — poverty, structural racism, unequal access to educational opportunity, and more — that foster violence. Without this context, the general public will have a harder time understanding violence as a multi-dimensional issue. Instead, violence will be seen as a one-dimensional problem, often confined within the realm of criminal justice.

Such narrowly focused news coverage has tremendous implications for reinforcing stereotypes about who commits violent acts. It also fosters assumptions that violence is an inescapable norm in society, when in fact, like most other public health issues, there are solutions and ways to prevent future violence. In contrast, when journalists broaden their coverage of violence to include the conditions surround it, the public is more likely to make connections to policies and strategies that can prevent it.

community violence report coverSo, what will it take to change the discourse around violence to elevate solutions instead of feelings of hopelessness? And has news coverage occurring alongside the Black Lives Matter movement begun to shift our understanding of violence in this direction?

With support from Kaiser Permanente and in partnership with the Prevention Institute, BMSG investigated these questions. To do this, we analyzed the current news narrative about community violence. We reviewed key California media outlets for three years to identify trends in news coverage of community violence and community safety. We found several main themes throughout the coverage:

  1. News about individual crimes dwarfed coverage of violence prevention and community safety. Stories about community violence were much less common than stories about individual crimes. Between 2013 and 2015, articles about individual murder appeared 10 times more frequently than articles addressing violence in the community as a whole. An example of the latter would be a story that pulls back the lens from an individual victim and perpetrator to include the lack of economic and/or educational opportunity, trauma from unstable living conditions, or other social determinants that led to the violent act.

    We found that when articles were framed around community violence and safety, the discourse included solutions and preventive approaches to stop violence before it occurs. These types of articles highlight the importance of collective action from politicians, educators, community leaders and others to build and maintain safe communities.
     

  2. Criminal justice professionals consistently dominated the news conversation about community violence and safety. Violence prevention involves health care, schools, businesses, public health and many other institutions. However, speakers from these sectors were largely absent from the conversation about community safety. The majority of speakers quoted in news stories were criminal justice professionals and representatives of state and local government. In 2013, community residents and those directly impacted by violence were quoted in only 1 in 10 articles. When those most affected by the violence are not shaping the story, it reduces the reader's understanding of the experiences that led to violence. The absence of community residents and speakers from different sectors also reinforces the frame of violence as only a criminal justice issue. A more diverse array of speakers could bring to light the impact of other systems and institutions that led to violence.
     
  3. Local news mirrored nationwide dialogue about racism and community violence. In previous news coverage, articles typically only mentioned race in passing, e.g. a report that mentioned the race of the young men involved in a murder. However, the motivation for mentioning race dramatically shifted in 2013 after the deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and many others that gave rise to the Black Lives Matter movement. In 2015, nearly one-third of articles about community safety discussed race or racism and its impact on community safety. The Black Lives Matter movement likely also significantly changed the media discourse on police reform: Now, instead of framing heavier policing as the sole solution to community violence, news stories often call for addressing racism as a strategy to build safer communities.

So, how can advocates use these results to reframe the discourse around community violence?

The findings reveal the start of a shift in the public dialogue around community violence and safety that advocates can build on to elevate prevention. Advocates can continue to broaden the conversation around violence by building relationships with reporters, expanding the variety of messengers in news about community safety, and pitching stories that require journalists to report on the role that different stakeholders and sectors play in building safe communities. Although changing the narrative around community violence can seem daunting, the recent spike in coverage surrounding gun violence is an opportunity to elevate prevention, multi-sector participation and community leadership.


healthy eating (1) privilege (1) Bloomberg (3) apha (3) news monitoring (1) FCC (1) Texas (1) soda industry (4) Let's Move (1) liana winett (1) Big Tobacco (3) tobacco industry (2) prison system (1) choice (1) food (1) health equity (10) Oglala Sioux (3) digital marketing (2) violence (2) Measure O (1) ssb (1) summer camps (1) women's health (2) HPV vaccine (1) beauty products (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Black Lives Matter (1) Tea Party (1) vaccines (1) McDonald's (1) Richmond (5) prevention (1) health care (1) structural racism (1) filibuster (1) physical activity (1) abortion (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) SSBs (1) Amanda Fallin (1) authentic voices (1) water (1) breastfeeding (3) race (1) gun violence (1) online marketing (1) sugary drinks (10) california (1) racism (1) Connecticut shooting (1) social justice (2) social math (1) values (1) genital warts (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Proposition 29 (1) elephant triggers (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) American Beverage Association (1) journalism (1) built environment (2) election 2016 (1) george lakoff (1) Chile (1) public health policy (2) violence prevention (8) measure N (2) Merck (1) food swamps (1) cap the tap (1) sanitation (1) community (1) food marketing (4) Berkeley (2) beverage industry (2) childhood obesity (1) obesity (10) tobacco control (2) food access (1) strategic communication (1) Proposition 47 (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sandusky (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Sandy Hook (2) SB-5 (1) PepsiCo (1) Aurora (1) Citizens United (1) community violence (1) political correctness (1) suicide prevention (2) environmental health (1) Big Food (2) Coca-Cola (3) news strategy (1) communication (2) collaboration (1) food justice (1) education (1) media bites (1) sexual violence (2) prison phone calls (1) advocacy (3) child sexual abuse (5) suicide nets (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Colorado (1) stigma (1) junk food marketing (4) cannes lions festival (1) snap (1) nonprofit communications (1) sports drinks (1) weight of the nation (1) public health (70) gender (1) cervical cancer (1) campaign finance (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Penn State (3) regulation (2) new year's resolutions (1) chronic disease (2) paper tigers (1) communication strategy (1) naacp (1) industry appeals to choice (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) cancer prevention (1) food industry (4) soda taxes (2) San Francisco (3) target marketing (8) media analysis (6) Rachel Grana (1) junk food (2) youth (1) media (7) default frame (1) paula deen (1) Whiteclay (4) SB 1000 (1) childhood trauma (3) messaging (3) cosmetics (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Bill Cosby (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food deserts (1) soda (12) childhood adversity (1) diabetes (1) community safety (1) marketing (1) Twitter (1) cigarette advertising (1) framing (14) Dora the Explorer (1) front groups (1) El Monte (3) Wendy Davis (1) equity (3) social media (2) language (6) Telluride (1) news coverage (1) diabetes prevention (1) personal responsibility (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) community organizing (1) Gardasil (1) seat belt laws (1) Marion Nestle (1) reproductive justice (1) Newtown (1) democracy (1) ACEs (2) sexism (2) product safety (1) inequities (1) corporate social responsibility (1) institutional accountability (1) food and beverage marketing (3) gun control (2) community health (1) soda warning labels (1) Happy Meals (1) Donald Trump (2) sexual health (1) news analysis (3) safety (1) emergency contraception (1) Big Soda (2) cancer research (1) SB 402 (1) government intrusion (1) mental health (2) water security (1) obesity prevention (1) tobacco tax (1) Joe Paterno (1) Michelle Obama (1) children's health (3) Nickelodeon (1) alcohol (5) Sam Kass (1) sexual assault (1) public health data (1) auto safety (1) social change (1) Catholic church (1) autism (1) soda tax (11) media advocacy (23) world water day (1) food environment (1) news (2) suicide barrier (2) white house (1) nanny state (2) tobacco (5)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: