What's missing from news coverage of violence?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

This summer, we witnessed the murders of unarmed black men by police across the United States and the frustration, grief and righteous anger that ensued as a result. Using social media, communities effectively captured the emotion and response to the violence and injustice embedded in policing tactics, moving the country to a national dialogue surrounding one of America's toughest questions: How do we address violence and the complex social and environmental factors surrounding it?

News coverage of crime and violence is an important venue for our society to answer that question. But research has shown that, historically, crime stories have largely neglected to include the community conditions — poverty, structural racism, unequal access to educational opportunity, and more — that foster violence. Without this context, the general public will have a harder time understanding violence as a multi-dimensional issue. Instead, violence will be seen as a one-dimensional problem, often confined within the realm of criminal justice.

Such narrowly focused news coverage has tremendous implications for reinforcing stereotypes about who commits violent acts. It also fosters assumptions that violence is an inescapable norm in society, when in fact, like most other public health issues, there are solutions and ways to prevent future violence. In contrast, when journalists broaden their coverage of violence to include the conditions surround it, the public is more likely to make connections to policies and strategies that can prevent it.

community violence report coverSo, what will it take to change the discourse around violence to elevate solutions instead of feelings of hopelessness? And has news coverage occurring alongside the Black Lives Matter movement begun to shift our understanding of violence in this direction?

With support from Kaiser Permanente and in partnership with the Prevention Institute, BMSG investigated these questions. To do this, we analyzed the current news narrative about community violence. We reviewed key California media outlets for three years to identify trends in news coverage of community violence and community safety. We found several main themes throughout the coverage:

  1. News about individual crimes dwarfed coverage of violence prevention and community safety. Stories about community violence were much less common than stories about individual crimes. Between 2013 and 2015, articles about individual murder appeared 10 times more frequently than articles addressing violence in the community as a whole. An example of the latter would be a story that pulls back the lens from an individual victim and perpetrator to include the lack of economic and/or educational opportunity, trauma from unstable living conditions, or other social determinants that led to the violent act.

    We found that when articles were framed around community violence and safety, the discourse included solutions and preventive approaches to stop violence before it occurs. These types of articles highlight the importance of collective action from politicians, educators, community leaders and others to build and maintain safe communities.

  2. Criminal justice professionals consistently dominated the news conversation about community violence and safety. Violence prevention involves health care, schools, businesses, public health and many other institutions. However, speakers from these sectors were largely absent from the conversation about community safety. The majority of speakers quoted in news stories were criminal justice professionals and representatives of state and local government. In 2013, community residents and those directly impacted by violence were quoted in only 1 in 10 articles. When those most affected by the violence are not shaping the story, it reduces the reader's understanding of the experiences that led to violence. The absence of community residents and speakers from different sectors also reinforces the frame of violence as only a criminal justice issue. A more diverse array of speakers could bring to light the impact of other systems and institutions that led to violence.
  3. Local news mirrored nationwide dialogue about racism and community violence. In previous news coverage, articles typically only mentioned race in passing, e.g. a report that mentioned the race of the young men involved in a murder. However, the motivation for mentioning race dramatically shifted in 2013 after the deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and many others that gave rise to the Black Lives Matter movement. In 2015, nearly one-third of articles about community safety discussed race or racism and its impact on community safety. The Black Lives Matter movement likely also significantly changed the media discourse on police reform: Now, instead of framing heavier policing as the sole solution to community violence, news stories often call for addressing racism as a strategy to build safer communities.

So, how can advocates use these results to reframe the discourse around community violence?

The findings reveal the start of a shift in the public dialogue around community violence and safety that advocates can build on to elevate prevention. Advocates can continue to broaden the conversation around violence by building relationships with reporters, expanding the variety of messengers in news about community safety, and pitching stories that require journalists to report on the role that different stakeholders and sectors play in building safe communities. Although changing the narrative around community violence can seem daunting, the recent spike in coverage surrounding gun violence is an opportunity to elevate prevention, multi-sector participation and community leadership.

SB 1000 (1) gun violence (1) corporate social responsibility (1) suicide nets (1) SB 402 (1) Coca-Cola (3) measure N (2) george lakoff (1) gun control (2) sugary drinks (10) sanitation (1) cap the tap (1) children's health (3) nanny state (2) San Francisco (3) Wendy Davis (1) new year's resolutions (1) food environment (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) youth (1) cancer research (1) gender (1) target marketing (9) sandusky (2) built environment (2) sexism (2) snap (1) Connecticut shooting (1) vaccines (1) personal responsibility (3) structural racism (1) health care (1) choice (1) Dora the Explorer (1) news (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) violence prevention (8) Amanda Fallin (1) tobacco industry (2) election 2016 (1) suicide barrier (2) water security (1) Let's Move (1) cancer prevention (1) values (1) news monitoring (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) social media (2) junk food (2) diabetes (1) beauty products (1) Sandy Hook (2) world water day (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Citizens United (1) liana winett (1) political correctness (1) breastfeeding (3) Marion Nestle (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) news strategy (1) marketing (1) media (7) beverage industry (2) Pine Ridge reservation (1) media bites (1) Twitter (1) Rachel Grana (1) genital warts (1) collaboration (1) mental health (2) Bill Cosby (1) Tea Party (1) tobacco (5) social justice (2) food swamps (1) food (1) equity (3) tobacco control (2) childhood trauma (3) summer camps (1) government intrusion (1) cigarette advertising (1) education (1) food and beverage marketing (3) media advocacy (23) Joe Paterno (1) advocacy (3) Newtown (1) Bloomberg (3) weight of the nation (1) ssb (1) language (6) auto safety (1) democracy (1) American Beverage Association (1) cosmetics (1) inequities (1) women's health (2) naacp (1) junk food marketing (4) Berkeley (2) online marketing (1) product safety (1) Nickelodeon (1) childhood adversity (1) HPV vaccine (1) privilege (1) front groups (1) community safety (1) El Monte (3) abortion (1) PepsiCo (1) Aurora (1) soda taxes (2) social change (1) Big Soda (2) Big Tobacco (3) food marketing (5) Whiteclay (4) Gardasil (1) stigma (1) food deserts (1) violence (2) racism (1) suicide prevention (2) communication (2) Proposition 29 (1) community health (1) Merck (1) filibuster (1) cannes lions festival (1) paper tigers (1) Penn State (3) communication strategy (1) strategic communication (1) SSBs (1) public health data (1) Measure O (1) race (1) white house (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) cervical cancer (1) Chile (1) Colorado (1) child sexual abuse (5) Richmond (5) california (1) elephant triggers (1) ACEs (2) Black Lives Matter (1) social math (1) childhood obesity (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) McDonald's (1) journalism (1) nonprofit communications (1) campaign finance (1) safety (1) news analysis (3) news coverage (1) framing (14) authentic voices (1) SB-5 (1) public health policy (2) health equity (10) Big Food (2) Oglala Sioux (3) community organizing (1) seat belt laws (1) food industry (4) prison phone calls (1) reproductive justice (1) community violence (1) Texas (1) soda tax (11) physical activity (1) soda industry (4) Catholic church (1) public health (71) tobacco tax (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) emergency contraception (1) obesity prevention (1) FCC (1) apha (3) food justice (1) messaging (3) institutional accountability (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) media analysis (6) obesity (10) paula deen (1) regulation (2) food access (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) water (1) gatorade bolt game (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Sam Kass (1) sexual assault (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Proposition 47 (1) default frame (1) digital marketing (3) sexual health (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) soda warning labels (1) diabetes prevention (1) environmental health (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Telluride (1) sports drinks (1) Michelle Obama (1) soda (12) Donald Trump (2) chronic disease (2) alcohol (5) prison system (1) sexual violence (2) community (1) Happy Meals (1) autism (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) healthy eating (1) prevention (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: