Win or lose, San Francisco and Berkeley soda tax measures are public health triumphs

printer friendlyprinter friendly

For advocates of public health policy, the sands of time could fill the Sahara Desert.

At least it seems that way as months, years, decades go by before structural and institutional changes are made to improve the health and save the lives of people throughout the nation.

These drawn-out battles have surely taxed advocates' patience and faith in the system. Typically, they've been David vs. Goliath fights with advocates being exponentially outnumbered in funds, political clout and other essential resources. They've involved countless numbers of defeats, both large and small. And at times they've been up against public opinion.

In 2012, I wrote about how change takes time shortly after Johnson & Johnson announced plans to remove a host of harmful chemicals from its products by 2015, becoming the first major company to make such a commitment. It was a change environmental health advocates had sought for nearly a decade — a battle we sometimes highlight as a case study in our media advocacy trainings.

I was reminded about this important lesson when I attended a rally last week that was held by supporters of Berkeley's sugary drink tax initiative, just minutes before it was unanimously approved by the city council for the November ballot. The measure proposes a 1-cent-per-ounce charge to distributors of soda and other sugary drinks and is similar to a bill across the bay in San Francisco. Following the defeat of two soda tax measures in nearby Richmond and in the southern California community of El Monte, where it was voted down after a $2.7 million campaign by the soda industry, supporters of the Berkeley and San Francisco measures face formidable odds.

berkeley vs big soda

At the rally, with its small but enthusiastic band of supporters on the steps of City Hall donning black T-shirts that read "Berkeley vs Big Soda," I heard both timid and boisterous voices giving heartfelt personal testimonies and summoning support for the tax proposal. I was hopeful the proposals would pass, but cautiously optimistic.

But then I remembered the Johnson & Johnson announcement of two years ago, and also the recent news that the board of the Golden Gate Bridge District voted unanimously to approve a $76 million cable net suicide barrier, a topic I've blogged about numerous times. For at least two decades, advocates for the barrier fought to help put an end to the more than a thousand suicides that have occurred at the bridge since it was built. Over the years, they employed a number of strategies including media advocacy to reframe the conversation and address the myths and stigma of suicide. They proved that fostering increased dialogue about suicide and mental illness would eventually lead to increased public support, and eventually, the board's vote on June 27 to approve the funds.

I think that if a soda tax measure were to pass anywhere, it would be Berkeley and San Francisco. These victories would surely lead to similar measures in other cities throughout the country as more communities and their leaders raise their voices in support of policies that make industry and government more accountable for their health. Eventually, one public policy at a time, we will stem the tide of diabetes and other nutrition-related diseases. It just takes time.


beauty products (1) sexual assault (1) vaccines (1) health equity (10) white house (1) Oglala Sioux (3) food industry (4) Measure O (1) water (1) obesity (10) structural racism (1) community safety (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Chile (1) gender (1) Gardasil (1) social media (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) journalism (1) Marion Nestle (1) product safety (1) Penn State (3) Rachel Grana (1) Richmond (5) Black Lives Matter (1) industry appeals to choice (1) obesity prevention (1) summer camps (1) alcohol (5) autism (1) values (1) collaboration (1) cannes lions festival (1) junk food marketing (4) Berkeley (2) regulation (2) ssb (1) El Monte (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) Aurora (1) target marketing (9) filibuster (1) child sexual abuse (5) Let's Move (1) news analysis (3) media advocacy (23) Tea Party (1) news (2) soda (12) sexual health (1) public health (71) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) abortion (1) government intrusion (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) auto safety (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) marketing (1) built environment (2) social change (1) world water day (1) food marketing (5) SB-5 (1) FCC (1) front groups (1) food deserts (1) Big Tobacco (3) digital marketing (3) Happy Meals (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) cosmetics (1) community organizing (1) Whiteclay (4) Wendy Davis (1) physical activity (1) community (1) PepsiCo (1) women's health (2) suicide nets (1) california (1) democracy (1) tobacco tax (1) Newtown (1) corporate social responsibility (1) genital warts (1) McDonald's (1) breastfeeding (3) childhood obesity (1) chronic disease (2) snap (1) prison system (1) Proposition 29 (1) Donald Trump (2) default frame (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) authentic voices (1) violence (2) news coverage (1) measure N (2) political correctness (1) privilege (1) apha (3) gun violence (1) personal responsibility (3) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) food environment (1) American Beverage Association (1) Bill Cosby (1) youth (1) elephant triggers (1) water security (1) childhood adversity (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food justice (1) Proposition 47 (1) Telluride (1) strategic communication (1) SB 402 (1) Nickelodeon (1) healthy eating (1) tobacco (5) Merck (1) social math (1) george lakoff (1) San Francisco (3) sports drinks (1) suicide prevention (2) suicide barrier (2) cancer research (1) naacp (1) liana winett (1) beverage industry (2) tobacco control (2) choice (1) Joe Paterno (1) food access (1) media bites (1) SB 1000 (1) SSBs (1) weight of the nation (1) sexism (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) framing (14) reproductive justice (1) news monitoring (1) sugary drinks (10) public health data (1) paper tigers (1) sanitation (1) Coca-Cola (3) advocacy (3) food (1) communication strategy (1) soda tax (11) prison phone calls (1) emergency contraception (1) education (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) children's health (3) Big Soda (2) stigma (1) media analysis (6) media (7) community violence (1) sexual violence (2) social justice (2) soda warning labels (1) prevention (1) tobacco industry (2) cancer prevention (1) HPV vaccine (1) soda taxes (2) mental health (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) communication (2) community health (1) Bloomberg (3) childhood trauma (3) ACEs (2) Catholic church (1) public health policy (2) environmental health (1) race (1) seat belt laws (1) institutional accountability (1) soda industry (4) online marketing (1) racism (1) Colorado (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) indoor smoking ban (1) messaging (3) paula deen (1) cigarette advertising (1) Big Food (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Amanda Fallin (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Twitter (1) election 2016 (1) sandusky (2) junk food (2) Citizens United (1) diabetes (1) health care (1) language (6) inequities (1) Texas (1) equity (3) cap the tap (1) news strategy (1) cervical cancer (1) gun control (2) diabetes prevention (1) Sandy Hook (2) nonprofit communications (1) gatorade bolt game (1) campaign finance (1) new year's resolutions (1) Michelle Obama (1) violence prevention (8) food swamps (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Sam Kass (1) nanny state (2) safety (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: