'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

childhood lead poisoning (1) Donald Trump (1) news monitoring (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) SB-5 (1) racism (1) mental health (2) Big Tobacco (3) george lakoff (1) health equity (10) advocacy (3) Proposition 29 (1) Wendy Davis (1) Citizens United (1) public health policy (2) HPV vaccine (1) food environment (1) marketing (1) suicide barrier (2) childhood trauma (3) food justice (1) chronic disease (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) framing (13) social justice (1) junk food (2) children's health (3) Joe Paterno (1) Connecticut shooting (1) sports drinks (1) regulation (2) race (1) sandusky (2) Proposition 47 (1) soda warning labels (1) food industry (4) Colorado (1) stigma (1) Richmond (5) health care (1) Measure O (1) corporate social responsibility (1) soda industry (4) gender (1) Big Soda (2) Pine Ridge reservation (1) weight of the nation (1) paula deen (1) Amanda Fallin (1) cigarette advertising (1) tobacco tax (1) gun violence (1) new year's resolutions (1) San Francisco (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Catholic church (1) SB 1000 (1) McDonald's (1) sanitation (1) Gardasil (1) Merck (1) violence (1) soda (12) front groups (1) beverage industry (2) Texas (1) Oglala Sioux (3) news analysis (2) government intrusion (1) structural racism (1) target marketing (7) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) SB 402 (1) beauty products (1) elephant triggers (1) measure N (2) violence prevention (8) child sexual abuse (5) media bites (1) junk food marketing (3) world water day (1) Happy Meals (1) Chile (1) news coverage (1) apha (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) Marion Nestle (1) suicide prevention (2) paper tigers (1) tobacco control (2) community violence (1) institutional accountability (1) autism (1) FCC (1) political correctness (1) soda tax (11) physical activity (1) Whiteclay (4) Tea Party (1) sexism (2) online marketing (1) sexual violence (2) choice (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sexual health (1) prevention (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) water (1) Berkeley (2) diabetes prevention (1) media (6) Johnson & Johnson (1) Nickelodeon (1) community health (1) childhood adversity (1) youth (1) nanny state (2) food swamps (1) Twitter (1) personal responsibility (3) Telluride (1) public health data (1) suicide nets (1) seat belt laws (1) obesity prevention (1) cap the tap (1) genital warts (1) tobacco (5) food and beverage marketing (3) Big Food (2) food marketing (3) white house (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) food access (1) women's health (2) news strategy (1) American Beverage Association (1) Penn State (3) El Monte (3) gatorade bolt game (1) food deserts (1) sexual assault (1) water security (1) Aurora (1) privilege (1) media advocacy (20) industry appeals to choice (1) california (1) indoor smoking ban (1) public health (65) product safety (1) cancer research (1) social math (1) Bloomberg (3) food (1) filibuster (1) naacp (1) cosmetics (1) tobacco industry (2) reproductive justice (1) Dora the Explorer (1) environmental health (1) obesity (10) equity (3) emergency contraception (1) snap (1) Michelle Obama (1) prison system (1) Coca-Cola (3) values (1) cancer prevention (1) sugary drinks (10) diabetes (1) social change (1) default frame (1) Rachel Grana (1) media analysis (5) auto safety (1) PepsiCo (1) digital marketing (2) communication (2) prison phone calls (1) childhood obesity (1) breastfeeding (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) abortion (1) healthy eating (1) gun control (2) education (1) messaging (3) alcohol (5) ACEs (2) inequities (1) SSBs (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) campaign finance (1) language (6) built environment (2) liana winett (1) Sam Kass (1) summer camps (1) social media (2) ssb (1) news (2) community safety (1) Newtown (1) vaccines (1) collaboration (1) Let's Move (1) Bill Cosby (1) cervical cancer (1) Sandy Hook (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: