'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

violence (2) news analysis (3) political correctness (1) journalism (1) digital marketing (2) institutional accountability (1) abortion (1) social media (2) genital warts (1) snap (1) Citizens United (1) industry appeals to choice (1) community organizing (1) media bites (1) Proposition 29 (1) ACEs (2) water (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Wendy Davis (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) nanny state (2) food justice (1) women's health (2) Colorado (1) framing (14) Sam Kass (1) youth (1) American Beverage Association (1) Marion Nestle (1) george lakoff (1) california (1) new year's resolutions (1) chronic disease (2) food marketing (3) violence prevention (8) news (2) Happy Meals (1) Twitter (1) filibuster (1) privilege (1) world water day (1) suicide prevention (2) food deserts (1) junk food (2) FCC (1) cervical cancer (1) sexism (2) Richmond (5) cancer prevention (1) childhood trauma (3) vaccines (1) food environment (1) community (1) tobacco tax (1) collaboration (1) public health data (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Penn State (3) authentic voices (1) prevention (1) emergency contraception (1) cosmetics (1) childhood adversity (1) Sandy Hook (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) Donald Trump (2) Newtown (1) Black Lives Matter (1) diabetes prevention (1) tobacco industry (2) Berkeley (2) childhood obesity (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) race (1) diabetes (1) tobacco (5) Michelle Obama (1) child sexual abuse (5) safety (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sanitation (1) soda (12) social math (1) advocacy (3) news monitoring (1) Let's Move (1) language (6) food industry (4) Aurora (1) Big Food (2) Connecticut shooting (1) prison system (1) news strategy (1) cigarette advertising (1) target marketing (7) democracy (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) soda warning labels (1) social justice (1) equity (3) indoor smoking ban (1) social change (1) PepsiCo (1) community violence (1) government intrusion (1) paula deen (1) suicide barrier (2) environmental health (1) choice (1) physical activity (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) built environment (2) Rachel Grana (1) food and beverage marketing (3) marketing (1) soda industry (4) children's health (3) Bill Cosby (1) suicide nets (1) public health (67) Gardasil (1) Chile (1) ssb (1) default frame (1) Telluride (1) healthy eating (1) stigma (1) Big Soda (2) Whiteclay (4) corporate social responsibility (1) values (1) summer camps (1) paper tigers (1) racism (1) news coverage (1) naacp (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Measure O (1) San Francisco (3) weight of the nation (1) sexual assault (1) media (7) Coca-Cola (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) white house (1) tobacco control (2) prison phone calls (1) health equity (10) beverage industry (2) Nickelodeon (1) junk food marketing (3) El Monte (3) Merck (1) gun control (2) HPV vaccine (1) Texas (1) reproductive justice (1) gender (1) SB-5 (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) structural racism (1) cap the tap (1) SB 402 (1) alcohol (5) personal responsibility (3) McDonald's (1) obesity prevention (1) food swamps (1) Catholic church (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) beauty products (1) sugary drinks (10) obesity (10) campaign finance (1) mental health (2) online marketing (1) front groups (1) Oglala Sioux (3) media analysis (5) apha (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) regulation (2) food access (1) cancer research (1) gun violence (1) health care (1) public health policy (2) soda taxes (2) community safety (1) autism (1) breastfeeding (3) sexual violence (2) soda tax (11) auto safety (1) SSBs (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) media advocacy (21) product safety (1) sexual health (1) sandusky (2) Joe Paterno (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) liana winett (1) communication (2) sports drinks (1) Big Tobacco (3) food (1) Proposition 47 (1) community health (1) messaging (3) Bloomberg (3) Amanda Fallin (1) elephant triggers (1) Tea Party (1) measure N (2) inequities (1) water security (1) education (1) SB 1000 (1) election 2016 (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) gatorade bolt game (1) seat belt laws (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: