'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.


summer camps (1) Wendy Davis (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) sexual assault (1) race (1) structural racism (1) Big Food (2) filibuster (1) water security (1) community health (1) communication strategy (1) stigma (1) seat belt laws (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) messaging (3) equity (3) gun control (2) paula deen (1) obesity prevention (1) gun violence (1) Nickelodeon (1) reproductive justice (1) public health data (1) apha (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) strategic communication (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Catholic church (1) Rachel Grana (1) media bites (1) junk food marketing (4) Aurora (1) education (1) default frame (1) childhood trauma (3) healthy eating (1) ssb (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) target marketing (9) Joe Paterno (1) junk food (2) auto safety (1) community organizing (1) San Francisco (3) food justice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) sexual health (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) sandusky (2) soda industry (4) suicide nets (1) food industry (4) food deserts (1) corporate social responsibility (1) social media (2) soda warning labels (1) obesity (10) chronic disease (2) childhood adversity (1) inequities (1) snap (1) election 2016 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) food (1) SB 402 (1) prevention (1) Amanda Fallin (1) choice (1) media advocacy (23) SB-5 (1) Sandy Hook (2) social change (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) physical activity (1) political correctness (1) Tea Party (1) community violence (1) children's health (3) government intrusion (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Newtown (1) autism (1) cancer research (1) sports drinks (1) tobacco control (2) campaign finance (1) community safety (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Chile (1) regulation (2) institutional accountability (1) paper tigers (1) Big Soda (2) news analysis (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) social math (1) digital marketing (3) sugary drinks (10) youth (1) violence prevention (8) beverage industry (2) Happy Meals (1) FCC (1) El Monte (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Big Tobacco (3) Berkeley (2) Telluride (1) soda tax (11) health care (1) marketing (1) naacp (1) public health policy (2) tobacco tax (1) cannes lions festival (1) Gardasil (1) diabetes prevention (1) measure N (2) california (1) privilege (1) Twitter (1) world water day (1) sanitation (1) cosmetics (1) white house (1) online marketing (1) Oglala Sioux (3) suicide barrier (2) weight of the nation (1) Marion Nestle (1) environmental health (1) food swamps (1) cancer prevention (1) prison system (1) Let's Move (1) news strategy (1) built environment (2) media analysis (6) cervical cancer (1) McDonald's (1) emergency contraception (1) media (7) Proposition 47 (1) cap the tap (1) ACEs (2) women's health (2) communication (2) social justice (2) liana winett (1) vaccines (1) community (1) childhood obesity (1) diabetes (1) news (2) Bloomberg (3) nonprofit communications (1) water (1) safety (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) front groups (1) SB 1000 (1) values (1) abortion (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) food environment (1) cigarette advertising (1) new year's resolutions (1) Measure O (1) tobacco (5) authentic voices (1) personal responsibility (3) elephant triggers (1) news coverage (1) Colorado (1) Texas (1) SSBs (1) beauty products (1) democracy (1) mental health (2) food access (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Whiteclay (4) news monitoring (1) gatorade bolt game (1) gender (1) alcohol (5) soda taxes (2) sexism (2) health equity (10) adverse childhood experiences (3) genital warts (1) violence (2) Citizens United (1) food marketing (5) nanny state (2) suicide prevention (2) Bill Cosby (1) Penn State (3) racism (1) journalism (1) sexual violence (2) soda (12) HPV vaccine (1) child sexual abuse (5) Michelle Obama (1) Sam Kass (1) breastfeeding (3) PepsiCo (1) Dora the Explorer (1) tobacco industry (2) george lakoff (1) advocacy (3) Richmond (5) Coca-Cola (3) product safety (1) collaboration (1) Donald Trump (2) Proposition 29 (1) public health (71) prison phone calls (1) American Beverage Association (1) Merck (1) framing (14) language (6) indoor smoking ban (1) Black Lives Matter (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: