'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

Colorado (1) language (6) safety (1) Citizens United (1) sexual health (1) Proposition 29 (1) violence prevention (8) autism (1) new year's resolutions (1) child sexual abuse (5) sexism (2) mental health (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) Merck (1) choice (1) diabetes prevention (1) community (1) Gardasil (1) obesity prevention (1) soda taxes (2) San Francisco (3) racism (1) sexual violence (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) gun control (2) gatorade bolt game (1) news analysis (3) childhood obesity (1) public health data (1) gun violence (1) industry appeals to choice (1) healthy eating (1) soda tax (11) reproductive justice (1) values (1) environmental health (1) alcohol (5) food (1) Catholic church (1) vaccines (1) social media (2) institutional accountability (1) prevention (1) tobacco (5) tobacco industry (2) media analysis (6) nanny state (2) Bill Cosby (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) SB-5 (1) online marketing (1) Berkeley (2) ACEs (2) soda industry (4) tobacco tax (1) equity (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) authentic voices (1) california (1) Twitter (1) Bloomberg (3) violence (2) soda (12) cannes lions festival (1) cap the tap (1) Rachel Grana (1) junk food marketing (4) media advocacy (23) Twitter for advocacy (1) race (1) measure N (2) diabetes (1) food and beverage marketing (3) health equity (10) Dora the Explorer (1) product safety (1) Telluride (1) sports drinks (1) Proposition 47 (1) food deserts (1) junk food (2) inequities (1) paper tigers (1) social math (1) media bites (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Happy Meals (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) community organizing (1) ssb (1) cigarette advertising (1) Whiteclay (4) Sam Kass (1) political correctness (1) food justice (1) media (7) childhood lead poisoning (1) elephant triggers (1) naacp (1) communication (2) El Monte (3) apha (3) government intrusion (1) physical activity (1) collaboration (1) public health policy (2) American Beverage Association (1) cancer prevention (1) target marketing (9) news coverage (1) filibuster (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Big Tobacco (3) privilege (1) food industry (4) HPV vaccine (1) Chile (1) journalism (1) strategic communication (1) prison phone calls (1) paula deen (1) beverage industry (2) default frame (1) obesity (10) social justice (2) auto safety (1) Penn State (3) SSBs (1) women's health (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) sanitation (1) Measure O (1) Wendy Davis (1) water security (1) news (2) community health (1) snap (1) news monitoring (1) community safety (1) seat belt laws (1) sexual assault (1) news strategy (1) marketing (1) Black Lives Matter (1) FCC (1) Joe Paterno (1) sandusky (2) front groups (1) water (1) cervical cancer (1) cancer research (1) Richmond (5) messaging (3) liana winett (1) communication strategy (1) Marion Nestle (1) soda warning labels (1) chronic disease (2) digital marketing (3) emergency contraception (1) Coca-Cola (3) framing (14) abortion (1) world water day (1) Texas (1) personal responsibility (3) food environment (1) regulation (2) Tea Party (1) suicide barrier (2) democracy (1) election 2016 (1) health care (1) genital warts (1) structural racism (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) public health (71) suicide nets (1) Newtown (1) food swamps (1) suicide prevention (2) SB 402 (1) Donald Trump (2) Big Soda (2) summer camps (1) Oglala Sioux (3) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) community violence (1) weight of the nation (1) built environment (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) education (1) george lakoff (1) McDonald's (1) Sandy Hook (2) PepsiCo (1) advocacy (3) cosmetics (1) Aurora (1) corporate social responsibility (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Nickelodeon (1) nonprofit communications (1) SB 1000 (1) Connecticut shooting (1) sugary drinks (10) food access (1) tobacco control (2) Amanda Fallin (1) Let's Move (1) children's health (3) prison system (1) childhood trauma (3) stigma (1) campaign finance (1) social change (1) childhood adversity (1) gender (1) Michelle Obama (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) beauty products (1) Big Food (2) youth (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) indoor smoking ban (1) white house (1) breastfeeding (3) food marketing (5)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: