'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

adverse childhood experiences (3) prison phone calls (1) elephant triggers (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) SB-5 (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) paula deen (1) choice (1) environmental health (1) Aurora (1) filibuster (1) abortion (1) mental health (2) Whiteclay (4) Pine Ridge reservation (1) media bites (1) indoor smoking ban (1) physical activity (1) SSBs (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) sexual violence (2) stigma (1) suicide nets (1) autism (1) HPV vaccine (1) Sam Kass (1) community violence (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) children's health (3) ACEs (2) diabetes prevention (1) Twitter (1) authentic voices (1) social math (1) regulation (2) default frame (1) collaboration (1) food justice (1) sugary drinks (10) obesity prevention (1) vaccines (1) Measure O (1) online marketing (1) diabetes (1) Sandy Hook (2) gender (1) language (6) PepsiCo (1) product safety (1) breastfeeding (3) news coverage (1) beauty products (1) community health (1) suicide barrier (2) news strategy (1) Wendy Davis (1) suicide prevention (2) Richmond (5) Let's Move (1) Chile (1) food marketing (3) nanny state (2) california (1) government intrusion (1) prison system (1) Black Lives Matter (1) apha (2) personal responsibility (3) messaging (3) values (1) sandusky (2) cap the tap (1) McDonald's (1) privilege (1) Donald Trump (2) cancer research (1) Coca-Cola (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Big Food (2) food and beverage marketing (3) food deserts (1) Marion Nestle (1) public health data (1) sexual health (1) soda tax (11) Proposition 47 (1) campaign finance (1) Dora the Explorer (1) soda warning labels (1) food environment (1) health equity (10) community safety (1) marketing (1) Tea Party (1) democracy (1) violence prevention (8) Twitter for advocacy (1) Bill Cosby (1) Big Soda (2) Nickelodeon (1) chronic disease (2) sexual assault (1) tobacco (5) Oglala Sioux (3) tobacco tax (1) Merck (1) youth (1) child sexual abuse (5) emergency contraception (1) community (1) education (1) childhood obesity (1) childhood trauma (3) paper tigers (1) sexism (2) Berkeley (2) world water day (1) george lakoff (1) El Monte (3) social change (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Telluride (1) Happy Meals (1) weight of the nation (1) sanitation (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Rachel Grana (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) genital warts (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) public health (67) sports drinks (1) San Francisco (3) Gardasil (1) framing (14) communication (2) Bloomberg (3) food (1) white house (1) Colorado (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) cigarette advertising (1) industry appeals to choice (1) cosmetics (1) health care (1) water (1) seat belt laws (1) safety (1) Penn State (3) racism (1) media advocacy (21) FCC (1) soda taxes (2) summer camps (1) violence (2) target marketing (7) soda industry (4) equity (3) community organizing (1) junk food (2) public health policy (2) alcohol (5) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) election 2016 (1) SB 1000 (1) political correctness (1) structural racism (1) healthy eating (1) childhood adversity (1) Catholic church (1) ssb (1) Michelle Obama (1) Amanda Fallin (1) cervical cancer (1) food industry (4) built environment (2) Joe Paterno (1) social media (2) institutional accountability (1) food access (1) news analysis (3) measure N (2) tobacco industry (2) beverage industry (2) soda (12) gun control (2) corporate social responsibility (1) new year's resolutions (1) Citizens United (1) media analysis (5) Proposition 29 (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) liana winett (1) Big Tobacco (3) Newtown (1) social justice (1) Connecticut shooting (1) food swamps (1) race (1) digital marketing (2) American Beverage Association (1) SB 402 (1) front groups (1) gun violence (1) news monitoring (1) snap (1) news (2) prevention (1) media (7) junk food marketing (3) tobacco control (2) Texas (1) advocacy (3) auto safety (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) naacp (1) reproductive justice (1) water security (1) cancer prevention (1) obesity (10) women's health (2) inequities (1) journalism (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: