'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.


white house (1) sports drinks (1) suicide barrier (2) gun control (2) sanitation (1) george lakoff (1) democracy (1) Berkeley (2) marketing (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) sexual assault (1) ssb (1) soda warning labels (1) alcohol (5) cancer research (1) Texas (1) nonprofit communications (1) childhood trauma (3) Bill Cosby (1) Citizens United (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Big Tobacco (3) media analysis (6) Michelle Obama (1) food access (1) california (1) El Monte (3) journalism (1) indoor smoking ban (1) cap the tap (1) Happy Meals (1) childhood obesity (1) childhood adversity (1) weight of the nation (1) sexism (2) news analysis (3) food and beverage marketing (3) soda industry (4) food swamps (1) SSBs (1) apha (3) physical activity (1) community violence (1) Chile (1) cervical cancer (1) Big Soda (2) Connecticut shooting (1) community safety (1) Newtown (1) communication (2) gatorade bolt game (1) regulation (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) authentic voices (1) Twitter (1) framing (14) structural racism (1) prevention (1) Measure O (1) snap (1) children's health (3) summer camps (1) race (1) media advocacy (23) nanny state (2) Big Food (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) cigarette advertising (1) institutional accountability (1) Donald Trump (2) product safety (1) suicide prevention (2) tobacco industry (2) suicide nets (1) soda taxes (2) food environment (1) Proposition 29 (1) environmental health (1) communication strategy (1) mental health (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) community health (1) media bites (1) language (6) paula deen (1) digital marketing (3) Proposition 47 (1) world water day (1) public health (71) campaign finance (1) beverage industry (2) Colorado (1) tobacco (5) tobacco control (2) diabetes (1) corporate social responsibility (1) front groups (1) measure N (2) online marketing (1) food marketing (5) Telluride (1) junk food (2) public health data (1) safety (1) reproductive justice (1) cannes lions festival (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) education (1) new year's resolutions (1) government intrusion (1) water security (1) public health policy (2) American Beverage Association (1) paper tigers (1) vaccines (1) obesity prevention (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Gardasil (1) FCC (1) soda tax (11) Catholic church (1) gender (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Amanda Fallin (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Oglala Sioux (3) equity (3) social change (1) food justice (1) collaboration (1) personal responsibility (3) Wendy Davis (1) election 2016 (1) news (2) chronic disease (2) Let's Move (1) elephant triggers (1) Bloomberg (3) violence (2) community (1) youth (1) messaging (3) advocacy (3) built environment (2) ACEs (2) SB 1000 (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) inequities (1) sugary drinks (10) cosmetics (1) health equity (10) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) prison phone calls (1) emergency contraception (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) health care (1) food industry (4) Marion Nestle (1) filibuster (1) social media (2) Merck (1) SB-5 (1) racism (1) HPV vaccine (1) Aurora (1) news coverage (1) Sandy Hook (2) food (1) child sexual abuse (5) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) liana winett (1) social justice (2) choice (1) Richmond (5) stigma (1) Whiteclay (4) autism (1) media (7) Nickelodeon (1) Rachel Grana (1) Coca-Cola (3) healthy eating (1) Sam Kass (1) Penn State (3) soda (12) industry appeals to choice (1) news monitoring (1) McDonald's (1) naacp (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) breastfeeding (3) tobacco tax (1) genital warts (1) women's health (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Dora the Explorer (1) default frame (1) news strategy (1) privilege (1) strategic communication (1) political correctness (1) junk food marketing (4) auto safety (1) prison system (1) diabetes prevention (1) SB 402 (1) sandusky (2) target marketing (9) values (1) obesity (10) community organizing (1) cancer prevention (1) seat belt laws (1) abortion (1) gun violence (1) Black Lives Matter (1) beauty products (1) sexual violence (2) food deserts (1) PepsiCo (1) social math (1) violence prevention (8) Joe Paterno (1) San Francisco (3) Tea Party (1) water (1) sexual health (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: