'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

Oakland Unified School District (1) Amanda Fallin (1) food access (1) Wendy Davis (1) community organizing (1) advocacy (3) sexism (2) cervical cancer (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) vaccines (1) sexual violence (2) cancer research (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) choice (1) prevention (1) filibuster (1) obesity (10) water (1) california (1) communication strategy (1) tobacco (5) Tea Party (1) digital marketing (2) obesity prevention (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) ssb (1) food swamps (1) apha (3) communication (2) soda industry (4) public health (70) paper tigers (1) Oglala Sioux (3) personal responsibility (3) messaging (3) SB 402 (1) summer camps (1) SSBs (1) SB 1000 (1) democracy (1) El Monte (3) physical activity (1) community health (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) nanny state (2) McDonald's (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) water security (1) social justice (2) health equity (10) food marketing (4) beauty products (1) alcohol (5) autism (1) mental health (2) Gardasil (1) sugary drinks (10) marketing (1) collaboration (1) sports drinks (1) Merck (1) food industry (4) naacp (1) breastfeeding (3) Coca-Cola (3) Whiteclay (4) healthy eating (1) media advocacy (23) online marketing (1) community (1) indoor smoking ban (1) FCC (1) Berkeley (2) Sam Kass (1) Big Tobacco (3) social change (1) media analysis (6) Connecticut shooting (1) news analysis (3) Happy Meals (1) youth (1) diabetes (1) elephant triggers (1) cancer prevention (1) violence prevention (8) soda tax (11) Catholic church (1) election 2016 (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Twitter (1) Richmond (5) sanitation (1) HPV vaccine (1) food deserts (1) cap the tap (1) ACEs (2) Citizens United (1) Proposition 29 (1) racism (1) suicide barrier (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) chronic disease (2) food environment (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) institutional accountability (1) cosmetics (1) tobacco industry (2) news monitoring (1) diabetes prevention (1) Rachel Grana (1) privilege (1) language (6) Bill Cosby (1) seat belt laws (1) sexual health (1) equity (3) childhood obesity (1) race (1) social math (1) sexual assault (1) emergency contraception (1) childhood trauma (3) journalism (1) prison phone calls (1) Penn State (3) news strategy (1) tobacco tax (1) beverage industry (2) SB-5 (1) soda taxes (2) PepsiCo (1) Bloomberg (3) new year's resolutions (1) paula deen (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Proposition 47 (1) Newtown (1) inequities (1) Chile (1) liana winett (1) reproductive justice (1) Marion Nestle (1) default frame (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) government intrusion (1) gender (1) children's health (3) soda warning labels (1) world water day (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) sandusky (2) weight of the nation (1) measure N (2) soda (12) social media (2) corporate social responsibility (1) abortion (1) suicide prevention (2) American Beverage Association (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) gun violence (1) snap (1) media bites (1) white house (1) target marketing (8) george lakoff (1) junk food marketing (4) Texas (1) cannes lions festival (1) structural racism (1) safety (1) environmental health (1) Big Soda (2) values (1) women's health (2) education (1) community violence (1) cigarette advertising (1) stigma (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Sandy Hook (2) health care (1) media (7) food (1) public health data (1) community safety (1) regulation (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) strategic communication (1) food and beverage marketing (3) product safety (1) gun control (2) child sexual abuse (5) auto safety (1) Black Lives Matter (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Measure O (1) Colorado (1) Let's Move (1) Telluride (1) junk food (2) public health policy (2) Michelle Obama (1) tobacco control (2) framing (14) San Francisco (3) Joe Paterno (1) Nickelodeon (1) suicide nets (1) news (2) news coverage (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) political correctness (1) gatorade bolt game (1) nonprofit communications (1) campaign finance (1) Big Food (2) genital warts (1) built environment (2) authentic voices (1) Donald Trump (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) front groups (1) prison system (1) violence (2) Aurora (1) childhood adversity (1) food justice (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: