'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

junk food marketing (3) Sandy Hook (2) Coca-Cola (3) violence (1) news analysis (2) media advocacy (19) filibuster (1) prison phone calls (1) El Monte (3) SB-5 (1) soda industry (4) water security (1) Bloomberg (3) chronic disease (2) inequities (1) ssb (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Sam Kass (1) cancer prevention (1) paula deen (1) childhood trauma (3) mental health (2) Newtown (1) Tea Party (1) equity (3) Gardasil (1) reproductive justice (1) sexual assault (1) youth (1) social change (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) violence prevention (8) women's health (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) HPV vaccine (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) tobacco tax (1) paper tigers (1) community health (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Let's Move (1) tobacco industry (2) social justice (1) product safety (1) news strategy (1) environmental health (1) media bites (1) sanitation (1) front groups (1) health care (1) Whiteclay (4) Happy Meals (1) framing (12) soda warning labels (1) gender (1) george lakoff (1) food swamps (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) sandusky (2) Big Food (2) advocacy (3) Amanda Fallin (1) Connecticut shooting (1) American Beverage Association (1) suicide nets (1) Rachel Grana (1) PepsiCo (1) sexual health (1) breastfeeding (3) water (1) sugary drinks (10) Marion Nestle (1) values (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) media analysis (4) physical activity (1) california (1) prevention (1) privilege (1) target marketing (7) community safety (1) beauty products (1) gun violence (1) community violence (1) government intrusion (1) ACEs (2) emergency contraception (1) structural racism (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) measure N (2) Twitter (1) social media (2) summer camps (1) Berkeley (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) FCC (1) language (6) corporate social responsibility (1) cap the tap (1) seat belt laws (1) Nickelodeon (1) alcohol (5) SSBs (1) food deserts (1) regulation (2) food (1) Colorado (1) SB 1000 (1) news (2) Telluride (1) healthy eating (1) personal responsibility (3) tobacco (5) Catholic church (1) food environment (1) choice (1) soda tax (11) default frame (1) Citizens United (1) news coverage (1) genital warts (1) white house (1) gatorade bolt game (1) education (1) Penn State (3) indoor smoking ban (1) sexual violence (2) sports drinks (1) nanny state (2) food marketing (3) San Francisco (3) elephant triggers (1) Bill Cosby (1) public health policy (2) beverage industry (2) public health data (1) world water day (1) naacp (1) Joe Paterno (1) children's health (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) suicide prevention (2) diabetes prevention (1) institutional accountability (1) marketing (1) abortion (1) Merck (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) news monitoring (1) suicide barrier (2) food industry (4) race (1) health equity (10) Big Soda (2) cosmetics (1) collaboration (1) Proposition 47 (1) snap (1) obesity (10) food access (1) food justice (1) Texas (1) communication (2) online marketing (1) built environment (2) cervical cancer (1) soda (12) liana winett (1) digital marketing (2) industry appeals to choice (1) Wendy Davis (1) social math (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) media (6) auto safety (1) cigarette advertising (1) tobacco control (2) vaccines (1) diabetes (1) childhood obesity (1) child sexual abuse (5) Chile (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Aurora (1) Dora the Explorer (1) messaging (3) autism (1) gun control (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) prison system (1) Proposition 29 (1) Measure O (1) Oglala Sioux (3) sexism (1) SB 402 (1) apha (2) childhood adversity (1) obesity prevention (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) junk food (2) campaign finance (1) McDonald's (1) stigma (1) Big Tobacco (3) weight of the nation (1) public health (64) cancer research (1) Michelle Obama (1) new year's resolutions (1) Richmond (5)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: