'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

Richmond (5) Happy Meals (1) product safety (1) paula deen (1) Aurora (1) tobacco industry (2) Catholic church (1) structural racism (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food deserts (1) cap the tap (1) Sam Kass (1) Merck (1) world water day (1) elephant triggers (1) sexual health (1) Joe Paterno (1) mental health (2) public health (55) Gardasil (1) news coverage (1) stigma (1) soda (12) Marion Nestle (1) cosmetics (1) Citizens United (1) values (1) Big Food (2) Telluride (1) public health policy (1) water security (1) junk food (1) measure N (2) Bloomberg (3) water (1) california (1) Chile (1) Big Tobacco (3) ssb (1) diabetes (1) social math (1) sports drinks (1) Penn State (3) built environment (2) Rachel Grana (1) physical activity (1) American Beverage Association (1) gun violence (1) beauty products (1) news strategy (1) food environment (1) food access (1) SSBs (1) online marketing (1) soda industry (4) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) junk food marketing (3) children's health (3) reproductive justice (1) Colorado (1) environmental health (1) Bill Cosby (1) equity (3) food and beverage marketing (3) sexual assault (1) autism (1) target marketing (5) naacp (1) SB 402 (1) genital warts (1) language (6) Newtown (1) indoor smoking ban (1) suicide barrier (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) food swamps (1) tobacco (4) Coca-Cola (3) suicide prevention (2) food industry (2) San Francisco (3) Measure O (1) FCC (1) Sandy Hook (2) apha (1) filibuster (1) obesity prevention (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) digital marketing (2) child sexual abuse (5) Wendy Davis (1) Whiteclay (4) prison phone calls (1) abortion (1) messaging (2) inequities (1) communication (2) summer camps (1) personal responsibility (2) prevention (1) Dora the Explorer (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Let's Move (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Nickelodeon (1) corporate social responsibility (1) regulation (2) new year's resolutions (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Michelle Obama (1) institutional accountability (1) SB 1000 (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) social media (1) sandusky (2) media analysis (2) weight of the nation (1) advocacy (3) framing (9) snap (1) healthy eating (1) george lakoff (1) prison system (1) Tea Party (1) childhood obesity (1) HPV vaccine (1) youth (1) media (4) choice (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) PepsiCo (1) health care (1) women's health (2) public health data (1) Berkeley (2) campaign finance (1) race (1) cancer research (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Oglala Sioux (3) media bites (1) alcohol (4) government intrusion (1) El Monte (3) beverage industry (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Proposition 29 (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) chronic disease (2) sugary drinks (6) media advocacy (16) health equity (9) cigarette advertising (1) nanny state (2) breastfeeding (3) Texas (1) auto safety (1) cancer prevention (1) tobacco tax (1) sexism (1) white house (1) liana winett (1) privilege (1) social justice (1) soda warning labels (1) cervical cancer (1) vaccines (1) gun control (2) violence prevention (6) front groups (1) food marketing (3) soda tax (10) food justice (1) SB-5 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) McDonald's (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) food (1) tobacco control (2) seat belt laws (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Big Soda (2) suicide nets (1) collaboration (1) gender (1) sanitation (1) obesity (9) sexual violence (1) marketing (1) violence (1) social change (1) Connecticut shooting (1) community health (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: