'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.


Twitter (1) government intrusion (1) beverage industry (1) summer camps (1) race (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) california (1) sexual violence (1) george lakoff (1) childhood trauma (2) Tea Party (1) cancer research (1) public health policy (2) physical activity (1) suicide prevention (2) FCC (1) Chile (1) auto safety (1) cap the tap (1) online marketing (1) community health (1) built environment (2) Penn State (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) advocacy (3) childhood obesity (1) world water day (1) Catholic church (1) Big Tobacco (3) soda (12) Richmond (5) messaging (3) Amanda Fallin (1) Whiteclay (4) SB 402 (1) Wendy Davis (1) Big Soda (2) naacp (1) stigma (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) breastfeeding (3) soda industry (4) sanitation (1) media bites (1) public health data (1) marketing (1) mental health (2) women's health (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) equity (3) corporate social responsibility (1) Bill Cosby (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) new year's resolutions (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) obesity prevention (1) Dora the Explorer (1) cancer prevention (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Oglala Sioux (3) diabetes (1) weight of the nation (1) Citizens United (1) emergency contraception (1) target marketing (7) industry appeals to choice (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Sandy Hook (2) Connecticut shooting (1) childhood adversity (1) gatorade bolt game (1) default frame (1) elephant triggers (1) Big Food (2) junk food marketing (3) obesity (9) social justice (1) cosmetics (1) social math (1) food marketing (3) violence prevention (6) paula deen (1) Merck (1) media advocacy (18) food deserts (1) SB 1000 (1) abortion (1) youth (1) liana winett (1) white house (1) soda tax (11) Texas (1) Marion Nestle (1) food industry (2) prison phone calls (1) media (5) sports drinks (1) food justice (1) SSBs (1) news coverage (1) suicide nets (1) children's health (3) news strategy (1) product safety (1) framing (11) American Beverage Association (1) Gardasil (1) food environment (1) Sam Kass (1) privilege (1) snap (1) soda warning labels (1) HPV vaccine (1) water (1) Michelle Obama (1) Let's Move (1) nanny state (2) water security (1) Happy Meals (1) seat belt laws (1) regulation (2) gun control (2) Telluride (1) junk food (2) Joe Paterno (1) suicide barrier (2) autism (1) cigarette advertising (1) collaboration (1) PepsiCo (1) sexism (1) sexual assault (1) digital marketing (2) alcohol (4) food access (1) SB-5 (1) Rachel Grana (1) gun violence (1) cervical cancer (1) indoor smoking ban (1) measure N (2) genital warts (1) communication (2) ACEs (2) vaccines (1) food (1) El Monte (3) structural racism (1) values (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) public health (59) Berkeley (2) environmental health (1) McDonald's (1) prison system (1) choice (1) language (6) prevention (1) tobacco industry (2) Coca-Cola (3) education (1) health care (1) campaign finance (1) diabetes prevention (1) violence (1) social change (1) sexual health (1) health equity (9) filibuster (1) Measure O (1) Proposition 29 (1) chronic disease (2) beauty products (1) reproductive justice (1) news analysis (1) community safety (1) tobacco control (2) media analysis (3) adverse childhood experiences (2) inequities (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Nickelodeon (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) personal responsibility (3) Colorado (1) child sexual abuse (5) tobacco tax (1) gender (1) sandusky (2) San Francisco (3) Aurora (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) apha (1) sugary drinks (9) Bloomberg (3) Newtown (1) community violence (1) tobacco (4) healthy eating (1) ssb (1) social media (2) food swamps (1) news (2) front groups (1) institutional accountability (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: