'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

ACEs (2) tobacco (5) media bites (1) weight of the nation (1) obesity (10) mental health (2) Whiteclay (4) sanitation (1) product safety (1) SB 1000 (1) cigarette advertising (1) Newtown (1) gun violence (1) world water day (1) Aurora (1) vaccines (1) Happy Meals (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) American Beverage Association (1) health equity (10) default frame (1) suicide barrier (2) prison system (1) news coverage (1) collaboration (1) cancer research (1) language (6) food justice (1) framing (14) education (1) Michelle Obama (1) food industry (4) food (1) sexual assault (1) nanny state (2) Coca-Cola (3) authentic voices (1) breastfeeding (3) auto safety (1) social math (1) food access (1) food environment (1) news monitoring (1) food deserts (1) public health policy (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) gender (1) violence (1) digital marketing (2) Proposition 29 (1) new year's resolutions (1) soda taxes (2) cap the tap (1) reproductive justice (1) Merck (1) Donald Trump (2) tobacco industry (2) news (2) filibuster (1) choice (1) Gardasil (1) Let's Move (1) abortion (1) child sexual abuse (5) paula deen (1) sugary drinks (10) childhood obesity (1) journalism (1) HPV vaccine (1) SB-5 (1) food marketing (3) Texas (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) water (1) paper tigers (1) target marketing (7) built environment (2) physical activity (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) autism (1) race (1) Citizens United (1) white house (1) cosmetics (1) Oglala Sioux (3) seat belt laws (1) Big Food (2) food swamps (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Connecticut shooting (1) liana winett (1) Berkeley (2) violence prevention (8) Wendy Davis (1) corporate social responsibility (1) news analysis (2) El Monte (3) sexism (2) diabetes prevention (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Big Soda (2) measure N (2) Dora the Explorer (1) Catholic church (1) community safety (1) Bloomberg (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) junk food (2) messaging (3) marketing (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) social justice (1) structural racism (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) tobacco tax (1) news strategy (1) beverage industry (2) childhood adversity (1) sexual violence (2) media analysis (5) community violence (1) Sam Kass (1) community health (1) social change (1) summer camps (1) public health data (1) democracy (1) San Francisco (3) youth (1) stigma (1) regulation (2) cervical cancer (1) gun control (2) california (1) Marion Nestle (1) Measure O (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) chronic disease (2) Proposition 47 (1) front groups (1) Big Tobacco (3) FCC (1) health care (1) cancer prevention (1) ssb (1) sandusky (2) privilege (1) SB 402 (1) media (7) Sandy Hook (2) Joe Paterno (1) public health (66) children's health (3) media advocacy (21) community organizing (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Nickelodeon (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) healthy eating (1) genital warts (1) Twitter (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Colorado (1) soda (12) apha (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) soda tax (11) indoor smoking ban (1) values (1) naacp (1) suicide prevention (2) alcohol (5) tobacco control (2) Bill Cosby (1) Rachel Grana (1) personal responsibility (3) childhood trauma (3) SSBs (1) McDonald's (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) environmental health (1) online marketing (1) water security (1) prevention (1) industry appeals to choice (1) beauty products (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Penn State (3) equity (3) Amanda Fallin (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) emergency contraception (1) campaign finance (1) soda warning labels (1) suicide nets (1) Telluride (1) sports drinks (1) sexual health (1) communication (2) diabetes (1) Tea Party (1) advocacy (3) women's health (2) george lakoff (1) social media (2) elephant triggers (1) institutional accountability (1) election 2016 (1) soda industry (4) Chile (1) obesity prevention (1) government intrusion (1) PepsiCo (1) racism (1) prison phone calls (1) political correctness (1) junk food marketing (3) food and beverage marketing (3) inequities (1) Richmond (5) snap (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: