'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

Food Marketing Workgroup (1) weight of the nation (1) SSBs (1) Penn State (3) default frame (1) Joe Paterno (1) food swamps (1) social change (1) sexual violence (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) tobacco industry (2) sexual assault (1) social media (2) public health data (1) sugary drinks (9) healthy eating (1) youth (1) alcohol (4) child sexual abuse (5) race (1) auto safety (1) george lakoff (1) choice (1) women's health (2) Dora the Explorer (1) ACEs (1) junk food (2) Sandy Hook (2) news coverage (1) measure N (2) indoor smoking ban (1) media bites (1) media (4) Wendy Davis (1) prevention (1) gun violence (1) cancer research (1) advocacy (3) Big Soda (2) white house (1) personal responsibility (3) collaboration (1) mental health (2) media advocacy (18) target marketing (7) food deserts (1) Colorado (1) Texas (1) Amanda Fallin (1) beauty products (1) violence (1) diabetes prevention (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Marion Nestle (1) cancer prevention (1) San Francisco (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) paula deen (1) cap the tap (1) Tea Party (1) Citizens United (1) obesity prevention (1) emergency contraception (1) tobacco (4) snap (1) community health (1) values (1) soda warning labels (1) Gardasil (1) Michelle Obama (1) American Beverage Association (1) news strategy (1) food justice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) water (1) Catholic church (1) reproductive justice (1) apha (1) Richmond (5) El Monte (3) privilege (1) institutional accountability (1) digital marketing (2) sexism (1) water security (1) online marketing (1) seat belt laws (1) soda tax (11) abortion (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) autism (1) elephant triggers (1) Big Tobacco (3) food (1) Chile (1) gun control (2) tobacco control (2) environmental health (1) Coca-Cola (3) childhood obestiy conference (1) Aurora (1) gender (1) junk food marketing (3) world water day (1) marketing (1) Newtown (1) Sam Kass (1) liana winett (1) framing (11) cosmetics (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) regulation (2) physical activity (1) inequities (1) social justice (1) ssb (1) McDonald's (1) vaccines (1) communication (2) california (1) obesity (9) PepsiCo (1) tobacco tax (1) social math (1) prison system (1) stigma (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) campaign finance (1) sexual health (1) messaging (3) cigarette advertising (1) FCC (1) adverse childhood experiences (1) SB 1000 (1) Happy Meals (1) cervical cancer (1) childhood adversity (1) new year's resolutions (1) public health (58) public health policy (2) Oglala Sioux (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) structural racism (1) diabetes (1) SB-5 (1) chronic disease (2) children's health (3) Connecticut shooting (1) equity (3) SB 402 (1) soda industry (4) Rachel Grana (1) sports drinks (1) filibuster (1) suicide barrier (2) product safety (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Big Food (2) language (6) Nickelodeon (1) news analysis (1) government intrusion (1) sandusky (2) food access (1) soda (12) built environment (2) Berkeley (2) Bill Cosby (1) corporate social responsibility (1) suicide prevention (2) Proposition 29 (1) food industry (2) prison phone calls (1) naacp (1) food environment (1) childhood obesity (1) sanitation (1) beverage industry (1) Twitter (1) HPV vaccine (1) industry appeals to choice (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) media analysis (3) food marketing (3) violence prevention (6) suicide nets (1) health care (1) Whiteclay (4) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) childhood trauma (1) Telluride (1) Let's Move (1) front groups (1) nanny state (2) Measure O (1) breastfeeding (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Merck (1) genital warts (1) summer camps (1) health equity (9) Bloomberg (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: