'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.

measure N (2) suicide barrier (2) news analysis (2) indoor smoking ban (1) news (2) soda taxes (1) news coverage (1) Michelle Obama (1) target marketing (7) cosmetics (1) Newtown (1) American Beverage Association (1) media bites (1) junk food (2) framing (14) sexual health (1) sexism (2) tobacco industry (2) paper tigers (1) food swamps (1) child sexual abuse (5) Bloomberg (3) election 2016 (1) mental health (2) Marion Nestle (1) Wendy Davis (1) political correctness (1) tobacco control (2) genital warts (1) Amanda Fallin (1) messaging (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) tobacco tax (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) gatorade bolt game (1) stigma (1) Sam Kass (1) Coca-Cola (3) sports drinks (1) food deserts (1) physical activity (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Citizens United (1) equity (3) Twitter (1) social media (2) gun violence (1) sugary drinks (10) Bill Cosby (1) george lakoff (1) ACEs (2) food access (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) choice (1) McDonald's (1) online marketing (1) community violence (1) communication (2) community health (1) democracy (1) FCC (1) women's health (2) social justice (1) california (1) junk food marketing (3) built environment (2) Telluride (1) education (1) government intrusion (1) Berkeley (2) San Francisco (3) beauty products (1) ssb (1) health equity (10) food marketing (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) sandusky (2) public health policy (2) corporate social responsibility (1) media advocacy (20) prevention (1) seat belt laws (1) values (1) Let's Move (1) elephant triggers (1) children's health (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) violence (1) Big Soda (2) SSBs (1) campaign finance (1) inequities (1) autism (1) media analysis (5) industry appeals to choice (1) youth (1) Aurora (1) SB-5 (1) public health (65) food industry (4) Rachel Grana (1) Joe Paterno (1) Nickelodeon (1) apha (2) cap the tap (1) soda tax (11) Chile (1) world water day (1) El Monte (3) sexual assault (1) Proposition 47 (1) structural racism (1) journalism (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Texas (1) childhood adversity (1) alcohol (5) reproductive justice (1) childhood obesity (1) food justice (1) water security (1) SB 1000 (1) Tea Party (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) emergency contraception (1) diabetes (1) abortion (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) childhood obestiy conference (1) advocacy (3) cervical cancer (1) personal responsibility (3) racism (1) white house (1) cancer research (1) obesity prevention (1) prison phone calls (1) regulation (2) food environment (1) beverage industry (2) breastfeeding (3) sexual violence (2) Big Tobacco (3) suicide prevention (2) childhood trauma (3) Connecticut shooting (1) filibuster (1) violence prevention (8) default frame (1) Penn State (3) gender (1) cancer prevention (1) community safety (1) SB 402 (1) weight of the nation (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Whiteclay (4) Happy Meals (1) Colorado (1) chronic disease (2) institutional accountability (1) sanitation (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Merck (1) Big Food (2) liana winett (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) soda (12) Donald Trump (2) healthy eating (1) public health data (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) social change (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Measure O (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) news strategy (1) soda industry (4) soda warning labels (1) environmental health (1) Catholic church (1) HPV vaccine (1) collaboration (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) water (1) privilege (1) diabetes prevention (1) suicide nets (1) food (1) Proposition 29 (1) naacp (1) news monitoring (1) auto safety (1) new year's resolutions (1) race (1) vaccines (1) paula deen (1) cigarette advertising (1) social math (1) Richmond (5) snap (1) digital marketing (2) front groups (1) PepsiCo (1) media (7) summer camps (1) tobacco (5) marketing (1) prison system (1) obesity (10) Sandy Hook (2) product safety (1) nanny state (2) language (6) Gardasil (1) Dora the Explorer (1) gun control (2) health care (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: