'Nurse-in' shows need for more breastfeeding support

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Breastfeeding in public is making headlines yet again. But before you get too excited, it's not the fanfare of exposed celebrity bosoms that had people talking a few years ago.

This time a nursing mom in Texas made national news when she tried to breastfeed her child in a Houston area Target store. Michelle Hickman found an out-of-the-way space in the women's section to nurse her baby. Yet despite Target's corporate policy that supports a woman's right to breastfeed anywhere in the store, staff at the store asked her repeatedly to move to a dressing room to nurse. For a variety of reasons, Michelle didn't want to have to relocate, leave her cart full of items unattended and be made to feel as if she were doing something wrong. She knew her rights and let the staff know that they were out of line in asking her to move.

Outraged, Michelle used Facebook to help organize a nationwide Target "nurse-in" to hold Target and other retailers accountable for protecting women's right to nurse in public if they so choose. I was proud to participate in the nurse-in at the Emeryville, Calif, Target nurse-in, where we thanked the management there for protecting our right to nurse on site.

But, as well-intentioned as the events were, the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. First, why thank chain stores for upholding rights that are already on the books, rights that protect our desire to nourish our children in the best possible way? It's 2012, after all, and we know about the benefits of breastfeeding. Are we really still having this conversation?

Apparently, yes. In spite of laws in 45 states that protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public, and 28 states with laws that protect women from public indecency claims, many retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces do not respect these rights. Women are asked to move, leave or are threatened with indecency claims. Well then, it's no wonder that despite a desire to breastfeed among more than 80% of new moms, nationally, less than 12% of women breastfeed exclusively for six months, as organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and World Health Organization recommend.

What's more troubling still is that the majority of women participating in Emeryville -- and in the other nurse-ins as well, from what the news reports show -- are middle class white women who have the time or flexible work schedules to bring babes in arms to a mom-friendly demonstration at 10 a.m. on a weekday. The fact that the face of the nurse-ins was what TIME Magazine called "smiling, middle-class mommies" means that low-income women of color, the women most likely to abandon breastfeeding due to lack of support in hospitals and workplaces, were barely represented at the events.

News coverage of breastfeeding is important and I was glad to see the media attending to it. We need more reporting on the barriers to breastfeeding in public spaces and in workplaces. One recent BMSG study shows that this part of the story doesn't appear as often as it could.

Women are better able to start and sustain breastfeeding when the places in which they give birth, work and shop encourage it. When retail sites and other public spaces discriminate against nursing women, women are more likely to abandon efforts to breastfeed, especially low-income women. Hospitals, retail stores, restaurants and other public spaces need to comply with state laws that encourage breastfeeding and protect a woman's right to breastfeed in public. Policies that make it easier for all women to breastfeed will lead to healthier mothers and babies and a healthier society overall.


institutional accountability (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) soda tax (11) public health data (1) public health policy (2) paper tigers (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) government intrusion (1) apha (2) gun violence (1) sexual health (1) communication (2) SB 402 (1) SSBs (1) collaboration (1) education (1) marketing (1) PepsiCo (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) emergency contraception (1) vaccines (1) social media (2) community violence (1) water security (1) reproductive justice (1) Marion Nestle (1) food and beverage marketing (3) HPV vaccine (1) junk food marketing (3) Proposition 29 (1) suicide nets (1) community safety (1) breastfeeding (3) Merck (1) Chile (1) built environment (2) Big Soda (2) regulation (2) physical activity (1) Colorado (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Texas (1) advocacy (3) prevention (1) Wendy Davis (1) ssb (1) cancer prevention (1) Big Tobacco (3) world water day (1) Sandy Hook (2) cosmetics (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) auto safety (1) Nickelodeon (1) liana winett (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Berkeley (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) framing (14) news monitoring (1) environmental health (1) Oglala Sioux (3) suicide barrier (2) Measure O (1) women's health (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) San Francisco (3) authentic voices (1) news strategy (1) values (1) choice (1) news (2) tobacco (5) food (1) Catholic church (1) food swamps (1) Bill Cosby (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) McDonald's (1) food deserts (1) sugary drinks (10) autism (1) online marketing (1) health equity (10) alcohol (5) community organizing (1) social change (1) soda industry (4) sanitation (1) ACEs (2) FCC (1) violence (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) chronic disease (2) suicide prevention (2) media analysis (5) target marketing (7) sandusky (2) SB-5 (1) weight of the nation (1) Whiteclay (4) political correctness (1) obesity prevention (1) Big Food (2) prison system (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Let's Move (1) violence prevention (8) Richmond (5) news coverage (1) health care (1) community health (1) cancer research (1) george lakoff (1) childhood obesity (1) Happy Meals (1) new year's resolutions (1) racism (1) media bites (1) tobacco control (2) prison phone calls (1) food marketing (3) cap the tap (1) Sam Kass (1) naacp (1) beverage industry (2) diabetes (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) youth (1) nanny state (2) Tea Party (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Donald Trump (2) Coca-Cola (3) Connecticut shooting (1) Joe Paterno (1) filibuster (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) summer camps (1) genital warts (1) social justice (1) democracy (1) abortion (1) food justice (1) sports drinks (1) gender (1) media advocacy (21) paula deen (1) equity (3) mental health (2) stigma (1) california (1) elephant triggers (1) Gardasil (1) gun control (2) Rachel Grana (1) election 2016 (1) news analysis (2) language (6) Citizens United (1) childhood trauma (3) white house (1) food access (1) public health (66) junk food (2) cigarette advertising (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) front groups (1) Twitter (1) Dora the Explorer (1) cervical cancer (1) Amanda Fallin (1) gatorade bolt game (1) personal responsibility (3) healthy eating (1) child sexual abuse (5) obesity (10) Michelle Obama (1) social math (1) media (7) industry appeals to choice (1) journalism (1) corporate social responsibility (1) seat belt laws (1) American Beverage Association (1) children's health (3) race (1) Telluride (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) soda warning labels (1) campaign finance (1) digital marketing (2) inequities (1) food environment (1) measure N (2) water (1) soda (12) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sexism (2) El Monte (3) SB 1000 (1) beauty products (1) childhood adversity (1) product safety (1) Penn State (3) Proposition 47 (1) messaging (3) snap (1) default frame (1) structural racism (1) tobacco tax (1) privilege (1) sexual assault (1) sexual violence (2) soda taxes (2) tobacco industry (2) Aurora (1) food industry (4) Newtown (1) Bloomberg (3) diabetes prevention (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: