Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


Food Marketing Workgroup (1) chronic disease (2) Coca-Cola (3) FCC (1) political correctness (1) suicide nets (1) news coverage (1) privilege (1) soda tax (11) social media (2) food industry (4) suicide barrier (2) corporate social responsibility (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) violence (2) obesity (10) PepsiCo (1) sanitation (1) structural racism (1) communication (2) education (1) suicide prevention (2) messaging (3) health equity (10) summer camps (1) Connecticut shooting (1) community health (1) social math (1) SB 1000 (1) marketing (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Donald Trump (2) junk food marketing (4) diabetes prevention (1) news (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) water security (1) Sandy Hook (2) Aurora (1) media (7) Tea Party (1) Sam Kass (1) sexual assault (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) racism (1) food and beverage marketing (3) childhood adversity (1) soda industry (4) junk food marketing to kids (2) personal responsibility (3) built environment (2) McDonald's (1) target marketing (8) default frame (1) prevention (1) seat belt laws (1) Oglala Sioux (3) world water day (1) Rachel Grana (1) childhood trauma (3) community (1) Penn State (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) digital marketing (2) ACEs (2) journalism (1) Let's Move (1) SB-5 (1) junk food (2) food (1) sports drinks (1) sexual violence (2) communication strategy (1) community violence (1) Texas (1) abortion (1) Whiteclay (4) Bill Cosby (1) language (6) filibuster (1) elephant triggers (1) social justice (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) ssb (1) front groups (1) environmental health (1) youth (1) beverage industry (2) cancer research (1) childhood obesity (1) SSBs (1) Happy Meals (1) Bloomberg (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) race (1) gun violence (1) emergency contraception (1) breastfeeding (3) new year's resolutions (1) physical activity (1) Marion Nestle (1) Merck (1) Big Tobacco (3) gun control (2) American Beverage Association (1) community organizing (1) reproductive justice (1) white house (1) nonprofit communications (1) Dora the Explorer (1) autism (1) Gardasil (1) child sexual abuse (5) Proposition 29 (1) community safety (1) tobacco control (2) cosmetics (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Colorado (1) El Monte (3) Twitter (1) food deserts (1) soda (12) government intrusion (1) auto safety (1) tobacco industry (2) authentic voices (1) paper tigers (1) tobacco (5) collaboration (1) california (1) Measure O (1) cap the tap (1) sexual health (1) choice (1) SB 402 (1) snap (1) obesity prevention (1) Proposition 47 (1) prison phone calls (1) election 2016 (1) cigarette advertising (1) Richmond (5) public health data (1) Telluride (1) indoor smoking ban (1) paula deen (1) regulation (2) cannes lions festival (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) food environment (1) framing (14) Catholic church (1) public health (69) institutional accountability (1) vaccines (1) diabetes (1) product safety (1) news strategy (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Citizens United (1) inequities (1) food swamps (1) news analysis (3) food justice (1) sandusky (2) genital warts (1) nanny state (2) media bites (1) stigma (1) social change (1) mental health (2) women's health (2) prison system (1) soda taxes (2) healthy eating (1) Big Food (2) children's health (3) violence prevention (8) campaign finance (1) Amanda Fallin (1) george lakoff (1) Nickelodeon (1) beauty products (1) cancer prevention (1) online marketing (1) news monitoring (1) equity (3) alcohol (5) media analysis (5) democracy (1) Joe Paterno (1) soda warning labels (1) apha (2) safety (1) tobacco tax (1) gender (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) food marketing (4) food access (1) advocacy (3) Michelle Obama (1) Wendy Davis (1) HPV vaccine (1) weight of the nation (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) measure N (2) Black Lives Matter (1) Big Soda (2) health care (1) Chile (1) values (1) cervical cancer (1) Newtown (1) San Francisco (3) public health policy (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) industry appeals to choice (1) media advocacy (23) strategic communication (1) water (1) liana winett (1) sugary drinks (10) sexism (2) Berkeley (2) naacp (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: