Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


Coca-Cola (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) marketing (1) Rachel Grana (1) nonprofit communications (1) safety (1) communication strategy (1) george lakoff (1) environmental health (1) public health data (1) social change (1) Tea Party (1) industry appeals to choice (1) community organizing (1) sexual violence (2) Black Lives Matter (1) gun control (2) Michelle Obama (1) choice (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Colorado (1) El Monte (3) Measure O (1) authentic voices (1) Chile (1) indoor smoking ban (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) tobacco industry (2) Proposition 29 (1) apha (2) Texas (1) Sandy Hook (2) soda (12) sandusky (2) FCC (1) gatorade bolt game (1) water (1) suicide prevention (2) child sexual abuse (5) sports drinks (1) snap (1) SB 1000 (1) prison system (1) Connecticut shooting (1) privilege (1) values (1) sexism (2) framing (14) community safety (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) social media (2) food deserts (1) childhood obesity (1) weight of the nation (1) regulation (2) junk food marketing (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) racism (1) Big Soda (2) Happy Meals (1) obesity prevention (1) Telluride (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) sexual health (1) news analysis (3) Big Tobacco (3) liana winett (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) diabetes prevention (1) tobacco tax (1) vaccines (1) health care (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) summer camps (1) institutional accountability (1) Merck (1) campaign finance (1) media bites (1) violence prevention (8) news coverage (1) food (1) election 2016 (1) Penn State (3) American Beverage Association (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Oglala Sioux (3) public health policy (2) built environment (2) cancer research (1) default frame (1) public health (67) food access (1) healthy eating (1) food industry (4) corporate social responsibility (1) genital warts (1) Marion Nestle (1) chronic disease (2) children's health (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Twitter (1) soda tax (11) political correctness (1) violence (2) youth (1) alcohol (5) gun violence (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) news strategy (1) online marketing (1) obesity (10) food swamps (1) Big Food (2) HPV vaccine (1) media advocacy (22) measure N (2) Bill Cosby (1) media analysis (5) emergency contraception (1) social justice (1) food and beverage marketing (3) prevention (1) Bloomberg (3) Catholic church (1) cap the tap (1) Richmond (5) Donald Trump (2) cosmetics (1) soda industry (4) SB-5 (1) social math (1) PepsiCo (1) government intrusion (1) stigma (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) food justice (1) naacp (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Proposition 47 (1) soda warning labels (1) physical activity (1) white house (1) Citizens United (1) abortion (1) community health (1) SB 402 (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) news monitoring (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) personal responsibility (3) breastfeeding (3) media (7) community (1) food environment (1) world water day (1) new year's resolutions (1) Berkeley (2) gender (1) SSBs (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) reproductive justice (1) Whiteclay (4) paper tigers (1) california (1) soda taxes (2) messaging (3) sugary drinks (10) Newtown (1) cancer prevention (1) filibuster (1) front groups (1) journalism (1) food marketing (3) language (6) sanitation (1) education (1) ACEs (2) Joe Paterno (1) water security (1) target marketing (7) health equity (10) tobacco control (2) beauty products (1) advocacy (3) structural racism (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) inequities (1) women's health (2) product safety (1) Aurora (1) suicide barrier (2) paula deen (1) democracy (1) beverage industry (2) diabetes (1) tobacco (5) mental health (2) childhood trauma (3) nanny state (2) seat belt laws (1) Let's Move (1) race (1) Sam Kass (1) ssb (1) collaboration (1) news (2) Gardasil (1) Wendy Davis (1) community violence (1) digital marketing (2) suicide nets (1) Nickelodeon (1) auto safety (1) equity (3) prison phone calls (1) cervical cancer (1) sexual assault (1) communication (2) cigarette advertising (1) junk food (2) elephant triggers (1) McDonald's (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) childhood adversity (1) San Francisco (3) autism (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: