Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


Gardasil (1) childhood adversity (1) george lakoff (1) childhood trauma (3) cosmetics (1) mental health (2) democracy (1) gun violence (1) junk food marketing (4) inequities (1) social justice (2) front groups (1) beauty products (1) tobacco industry (2) food and beverage marketing (3) physical activity (1) Colorado (1) tobacco (5) sexual violence (2) advocacy (3) Bloomberg (3) prevention (1) nonprofit communications (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Proposition 29 (1) Texas (1) authentic voices (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) paula deen (1) Amanda Fallin (1) health equity (10) community (1) SB 402 (1) gun control (2) cigarette advertising (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) SSBs (1) news analysis (3) suicide prevention (2) media (7) Whiteclay (4) public health policy (2) El Monte (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) genital warts (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) healthy eating (1) ACEs (2) product safety (1) Dora the Explorer (1) racism (1) filibuster (1) HPV vaccine (1) soda taxes (2) children's health (3) structural racism (1) online marketing (1) collaboration (1) Happy Meals (1) child sexual abuse (5) liana winett (1) soda warning labels (1) diabetes prevention (1) PepsiCo (1) Nickelodeon (1) food environment (1) public health (71) Penn State (3) news coverage (1) food deserts (1) indoor smoking ban (1) childhood obesity (1) gender (1) food marketing (5) language (6) SB-5 (1) food justice (1) Measure O (1) tobacco tax (1) Richmond (5) Connecticut shooting (1) public health data (1) equity (3) choice (1) cancer research (1) SB 1000 (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) tobacco control (2) Oglala Sioux (3) Telluride (1) chronic disease (2) health care (1) sexual assault (1) youth (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) journalism (1) auto safety (1) sugary drinks (10) sanitation (1) vaccines (1) digital marketing (3) reproductive justice (1) political correctness (1) suicide barrier (2) naacp (1) strategic communication (1) safety (1) Chile (1) news (2) Bill Cosby (1) soda industry (4) FCC (1) snap (1) privilege (1) Catholic church (1) media advocacy (23) values (1) environmental health (1) election 2016 (1) seat belt laws (1) Donald Trump (2) sandusky (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Rachel Grana (1) soda (12) American Beverage Association (1) california (1) personal responsibility (3) industry appeals to choice (1) alcohol (5) Sam Kass (1) stigma (1) race (1) women's health (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) water security (1) regulation (2) communication strategy (1) social math (1) soda tax (11) target marketing (9) Twitter for advocacy (1) built environment (2) social media (2) Tea Party (1) sexism (2) food (1) Wendy Davis (1) McDonald's (1) community safety (1) Sandy Hook (2) default frame (1) cervical cancer (1) Big Food (2) abortion (1) Michelle Obama (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) cancer prevention (1) breastfeeding (3) community violence (1) San Francisco (3) Newtown (1) Aurora (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) news monitoring (1) news strategy (1) community health (1) violence (2) cap the tap (1) obesity prevention (1) elephant triggers (1) Coca-Cola (3) government intrusion (1) world water day (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) ssb (1) sexual health (1) Twitter (1) food swamps (1) summer camps (1) Big Tobacco (3) marketing (1) cannes lions festival (1) framing (14) water (1) violence prevention (8) apha (3) gatorade bolt game (1) sports drinks (1) Big Soda (2) white house (1) food access (1) Marion Nestle (1) weight of the nation (1) nanny state (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) beverage industry (2) community organizing (1) obesity (10) new year's resolutions (1) measure N (2) suicide nets (1) Proposition 47 (1) media bites (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) media analysis (6) campaign finance (1) emergency contraception (1) junk food (2) corporate social responsibility (1) autism (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) diabetes (1) messaging (3) paper tigers (1) Merck (1) communication (2) Let's Move (1) education (1) institutional accountability (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Citizens United (1) prison phone calls (1) Joe Paterno (1) food industry (4) Berkeley (2) social change (1) prison system (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: