Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


sugary drinks (10) Rachel Grana (1) Gardasil (1) filibuster (1) values (1) sandusky (2) childhood adversity (1) McDonald's (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) public health policy (2) community health (1) Citizens United (1) women's health (2) summer camps (1) government intrusion (1) Big Soda (2) sexual health (1) sanitation (1) communication (2) built environment (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) news strategy (1) campaign finance (1) news (2) snap (1) Bloomberg (3) indoor smoking ban (1) sexual violence (2) media advocacy (21) Nickelodeon (1) paper tigers (1) Sam Kass (1) violence prevention (8) community (1) measure N (2) community safety (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Whiteclay (4) media analysis (5) diabetes (1) food justice (1) soda industry (4) childhood trauma (3) Texas (1) online marketing (1) Wendy Davis (1) water (1) public health (67) Tea Party (1) prevention (1) Connecticut shooting (1) soda (12) food industry (4) community organizing (1) california (1) food and beverage marketing (3) American Beverage Association (1) prison phone calls (1) inequities (1) world water day (1) obesity prevention (1) personal responsibility (3) Dora the Explorer (1) SB 402 (1) Measure O (1) cancer research (1) messaging (3) health equity (10) HPV vaccine (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) news monitoring (1) suicide prevention (2) suicide barrier (2) community violence (1) social change (1) digital marketing (2) sexism (2) food (1) front groups (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) paula deen (1) PepsiCo (1) tobacco control (2) weight of the nation (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) social math (1) Twitter (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) soda tax (11) language (6) Sandy Hook (2) soda warning labels (1) george lakoff (1) child sexual abuse (5) apha (2) Catholic church (1) autism (1) healthy eating (1) emergency contraception (1) Big Food (2) SSBs (1) youth (1) Aurora (1) Chile (1) institutional accountability (1) obesity (10) junk food marketing to kids (2) democracy (1) violence (2) seat belt laws (1) Merck (1) El Monte (3) elephant triggers (1) food environment (1) equity (3) FCC (1) choice (1) beauty products (1) media (7) marketing (1) social justice (1) authentic voices (1) food deserts (1) physical activity (1) junk food (2) environmental health (1) cervical cancer (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) suicide nets (1) Richmond (5) childhood obesity (1) Black Lives Matter (1) cap the tap (1) SB-5 (1) social media (2) target marketing (7) Telluride (1) corporate social responsibility (1) vaccines (1) sports drinks (1) public health data (1) health care (1) race (1) journalism (1) framing (14) Proposition 29 (1) safety (1) tobacco tax (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food marketing (3) alcohol (5) Let's Move (1) collaboration (1) Amanda Fallin (1) political correctness (1) food access (1) water security (1) gun violence (1) breastfeeding (3) gun control (2) Michelle Obama (1) San Francisco (3) stigma (1) Bill Cosby (1) Donald Trump (2) news coverage (1) auto safety (1) product safety (1) food swamps (1) abortion (1) election 2016 (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) gender (1) white house (1) default frame (1) tobacco industry (2) Newtown (1) Penn State (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) Proposition 47 (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Joe Paterno (1) beverage industry (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) soda taxes (2) Marion Nestle (1) Coca-Cola (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) ACEs (2) chronic disease (2) ssb (1) cancer prevention (1) sexual assault (1) tobacco (5) privilege (1) mental health (2) Berkeley (2) news analysis (3) Happy Meals (1) reproductive justice (1) children's health (3) SB 1000 (1) cosmetics (1) regulation (2) education (1) advocacy (3) cigarette advertising (1) structural racism (1) diabetes prevention (1) Big Tobacco (3) liana winett (1) prison system (1) junk food marketing (3) genital warts (1) media bites (1) racism (1) naacp (1) new year's resolutions (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Colorado (1) nanny state (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: