Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


Berkeley (2) children's health (3) violence prevention (8) adverse childhood experiences (3) auto safety (1) cervical cancer (1) stigma (1) sanitation (1) Bloomberg (3) elephant triggers (1) soda (12) SB 1000 (1) seat belt laws (1) liana winett (1) george lakoff (1) Coca-Cola (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Wendy Davis (1) Catholic church (1) Penn State (3) messaging (3) water (1) tobacco tax (1) Telluride (1) cap the tap (1) equity (3) industry appeals to choice (1) Aurora (1) communication strategy (1) junk food (2) PepsiCo (1) news monitoring (1) Twitter (1) El Monte (3) cancer prevention (1) alcohol (5) child sexual abuse (5) Happy Meals (1) community health (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) paper tigers (1) cosmetics (1) Proposition 47 (1) women's health (2) democracy (1) advocacy (3) social justice (2) racism (1) marketing (1) diabetes prevention (1) chronic disease (2) front groups (1) Gardasil (1) Dora the Explorer (1) McDonald's (1) SB-5 (1) Marion Nestle (1) Tea Party (1) Texas (1) health care (1) Proposition 29 (1) filibuster (1) San Francisco (3) Colorado (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sports drinks (1) soda industry (4) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) abortion (1) Donald Trump (2) SSBs (1) soda warning labels (1) social change (1) paula deen (1) physical activity (1) prison phone calls (1) Big Soda (2) community safety (1) childhood trauma (3) suicide prevention (2) food deserts (1) Merck (1) water security (1) product safety (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) regulation (2) political correctness (1) safety (1) corporate social responsibility (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food access (1) tobacco industry (2) apha (3) target marketing (9) obesity (10) Whiteclay (4) ACEs (2) food environment (1) media advocacy (23) Amanda Fallin (1) tobacco control (2) news coverage (1) Oglala Sioux (3) gun violence (1) genital warts (1) cancer research (1) health equity (10) tobacco (5) privilege (1) Bill Cosby (1) Rachel Grana (1) media bites (1) obesity prevention (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) food industry (4) healthy eating (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) food and beverage marketing (3) SB 402 (1) Citizens United (1) Chile (1) cannes lions festival (1) naacp (1) communication (2) food swamps (1) gun control (2) prison system (1) food marketing (5) Joe Paterno (1) public health policy (2) media analysis (6) white house (1) public health (71) news strategy (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) diabetes (1) Richmond (5) public health data (1) measure N (2) FCC (1) news analysis (3) cigarette advertising (1) sexual health (1) journalism (1) sugary drinks (10) food justice (1) Sandy Hook (2) American Beverage Association (1) weight of the nation (1) online marketing (1) community violence (1) new year's resolutions (1) social media (2) childhood obesity (1) ssb (1) built environment (2) Nickelodeon (1) beauty products (1) strategic communication (1) prevention (1) gatorade bolt game (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) collaboration (1) inequities (1) youth (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) authentic voices (1) nonprofit communications (1) gender (1) values (1) framing (14) news (2) Measure O (1) language (6) breastfeeding (3) Connecticut shooting (1) sexism (2) indoor smoking ban (1) media (7) HPV vaccine (1) default frame (1) soda tax (11) beverage industry (2) personal responsibility (3) junk food marketing (4) vaccines (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) childhood adversity (1) nanny state (2) suicide barrier (2) violence (2) election 2016 (1) sexual assault (1) Let's Move (1) summer camps (1) emergency contraception (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) california (1) campaign finance (1) soda taxes (2) social math (1) Newtown (1) Big Tobacco (3) Sam Kass (1) education (1) structural racism (1) sexual violence (2) choice (1) community organizing (1) mental health (2) sandusky (2) snap (1) food (1) government intrusion (1) institutional accountability (1) Michelle Obama (1) community (1) Big Food (2) world water day (1) digital marketing (3) autism (1) reproductive justice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) environmental health (1) suicide nets (1) race (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: