Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


media bites (1) Tea Party (1) junk food (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) community (1) government intrusion (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) nonprofit communications (1) news strategy (1) beauty products (1) cosmetics (1) ssb (1) naacp (1) weight of the nation (1) childhood adversity (1) beverage industry (2) sexual health (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) collaboration (1) SB 1000 (1) stigma (1) autism (1) Amanda Fallin (1) tobacco control (2) Pine Ridge reservation (1) paper tigers (1) personal responsibility (3) Dora the Explorer (1) media analysis (6) safety (1) tobacco tax (1) corporate social responsibility (1) campaign finance (1) food justice (1) Michelle Obama (1) regulation (2) authentic voices (1) snap (1) obesity prevention (1) Penn State (3) public health data (1) Donald Trump (2) San Francisco (3) prevention (1) Sandy Hook (2) emergency contraception (1) Big Soda (2) Citizens United (1) prison phone calls (1) water (1) suicide nets (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) PepsiCo (1) Bill Cosby (1) advocacy (3) language (6) Big Tobacco (3) sports drinks (1) Connecticut shooting (1) gun violence (1) online marketing (1) paula deen (1) industry appeals to choice (1) inequities (1) childhood trauma (3) health equity (10) sexism (2) Richmond (5) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) food deserts (1) Nickelodeon (1) equity (3) environmental health (1) journalism (1) suicide barrier (2) racism (1) default frame (1) American Beverage Association (1) Twitter (1) public health (70) news coverage (1) sugary drinks (10) soda industry (4) community health (1) education (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) McDonald's (1) product safety (1) target marketing (8) cervical cancer (1) Joe Paterno (1) indoor smoking ban (1) SSBs (1) soda tax (11) Golden Gate Bridge (2) cannes lions festival (1) white house (1) Proposition 29 (1) Proposition 47 (1) community safety (1) breastfeeding (3) HPV vaccine (1) soda taxes (2) Coca-Cola (3) violence (2) Chile (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Measure O (1) health care (1) gatorade bolt game (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) mental health (2) water security (1) public health policy (2) Newtown (1) media advocacy (23) abortion (1) vaccines (1) summer camps (1) Big Food (2) Let's Move (1) cap the tap (1) messaging (3) Colorado (1) structural racism (1) chronic disease (2) FCC (1) food environment (1) diabetes prevention (1) community violence (1) Aurora (1) food access (1) women's health (2) obesity (10) seat belt laws (1) auto safety (1) alcohol (5) suicide prevention (2) elephant triggers (1) children's health (3) cancer research (1) food (1) Wendy Davis (1) Gardasil (1) Berkeley (2) Whiteclay (4) communication strategy (1) race (1) news monitoring (1) Marion Nestle (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) soda (12) Telluride (1) physical activity (1) food swamps (1) Catholic church (1) communication (2) media (7) values (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) california (1) front groups (1) political correctness (1) nanny state (2) soda warning labels (1) sandusky (2) social media (2) prison system (1) digital marketing (2) tobacco (5) strategic communication (1) measure N (2) social math (1) sexual violence (2) world water day (1) choice (1) built environment (2) ACEs (2) liana winett (1) food industry (4) food and beverage marketing (3) democracy (1) marketing (1) gender (1) SB 402 (1) violence prevention (8) election 2016 (1) news (2) Texas (1) SB-5 (1) cigarette advertising (1) framing (14) junk food marketing (4) cancer prevention (1) social justice (2) healthy eating (1) Merck (1) Rachel Grana (1) george lakoff (1) news analysis (3) Black Lives Matter (1) food marketing (4) privilege (1) institutional accountability (1) reproductive justice (1) youth (1) apha (3) childhood obestiy conference (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) gun control (2) child sexual abuse (5) sexual assault (1) social change (1) Sam Kass (1) community organizing (1) filibuster (1) new year's resolutions (1) childhood obesity (1) tobacco industry (2) El Monte (3) genital warts (1) Happy Meals (1) diabetes (1) Bloomberg (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) sanitation (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: