Food marketing to children is not improving rapidly enough, Lori Dorfman tells White House audience

printer friendlyprinter friendly

lori dorfmanMarketing of junk food and sugar-sweetened drinks to children is improving in "baby steps," Lori Dorfman, DrPH, director of PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group, told a White House gathering held by First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Far more needs to be done, and quickly, particularly because aggressive food marketing to children via mobile phones and other digital media is growing explosively, said Dorfman, a national authority on food marketing to kids who has written and spoken extensively on the subject.

"I told them I want to turbo charge movement around marketing to children because we need to move much faster. Researchers say that at the rate we're going, we won't have the right balance of ads on TV until 2033. We can't afford to lose a generation of kids who are forming their ideas about what to eat based on billions of dollars of marketing bombarding them every year," Dorfman said of the event, attended by representatives of food and media companies, advocacy and parents groups, government agencies and research organizations.

Inroads being made in marketing healthier food to kids

Dorfman pointed to some small signs of progress: About 90 percent of the ads Nickelodeon aired in 2005 were for junk food; last year, its junk food ads declined to about 70 percent of ads, Dorfman said. Also, members of a voluntary regulatory body, the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), have made pledges of their own choice to improve nutrients in the products they market to children, but by late 2014 all member companies will adhere to a consistent set of nutrition standards. Although a positive sign, this plan still doesn't cover all the junk food marketing children are exposed to, she said.

Perhaps the White House meeting itself is the biggest harbinger of movement, said Dorfman, who also co-chairs the Food Marketing Workgroup.

"The fact we were there in the White House is a key indicator that this is an issue everyone takes seriously now," said Dorfman.

Digital marketing "gets more eyeballs"

While food companies' spending to push their products on children decreased slightly from about $2 billion in 2006 to $1.8 billion in 2009, this slight decline partly fueled by the recession was offset by a 50 percent increase in digital marketing, which is much less expensive to produce than television ads and "gets more eyeballs for the buck," Dorfman told the gathering.

"A 30-second commercial is here and gone," she said. "If you're pushing a Froot Loop around the screen, you can be doing this for 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes at a time and then sending it to a friend."

chuck e cheeseThe exposure to digital marketing games, contests and promotions is even more intense for children from multicultural and low-income communities they get a "double dose" of marketing through general campaigns for children and others that target African American and Latino children in particular. "They're more receptive and approving of ads than their white peers," Dorfman said. "This might be because if you're an African American kid, you don't see yourself in the media that much; when you do, you're really attentive to it."

For example, Chuck E. Cheese's has used African American children to encourage kids to download an app, visit the restaurant and have a photo taken showing the giant Chuck E. Cheese mouse with his arms around them. This kind of marketing appeals to kids and has a long "shelf" life in their homes.

Broad voluntary regulations needed

Dorfman called for the CFBAI to put regulations in place covering all forms of advertising, including product packaging, sponsorships, and marketing in schools as well as stronger nutrition standards for healthy foods.

"Yes, parents have responsibility for their children, but parents don't have responsibility for putting characters on cereal boxes at kids' eye level on supermarket shelves," she said. "Parents are not responsible for fruits snacks that are not fruit. Parents don't have the power to change that. But the companies do."

Carolyn Newbergh is a writer and editor in the Public Health Institute's communications department.

autism (1) gender (1) food swamps (1) health equity (10) filibuster (1) Merck (1) gatorade bolt game (1) soda industry (4) childhood trauma (3) women's health (2) tobacco industry (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Colorado (1) journalism (1) health care (1) racism (1) paper tigers (1) framing (14) Michelle Obama (1) Tea Party (1) elephant triggers (1) online marketing (1) summer camps (1) environmental health (1) soda tax (11) water security (1) choice (1) front groups (1) diabetes (1) gun control (2) cancer prevention (1) digital marketing (3) authentic voices (1) news coverage (1) Bloomberg (3) media advocacy (23) media (7) food and beverage marketing (3) obesity (10) food access (1) junk food (2) Rachel Grana (1) SB-5 (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) education (1) beauty products (1) Donald Trump (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) food justice (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Big Food (2) Let's Move (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sexual health (1) values (1) cancer research (1) community health (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) race (1) violence (2) vaccines (1) product safety (1) Measure O (1) sexual assault (1) apha (3) childhood obesity (1) social change (1) ssb (1) youth (1) communication strategy (1) community organizing (1) reproductive justice (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Aurora (1) regulation (2) safety (1) auto safety (1) social media (2) Dora the Explorer (1) Marion Nestle (1) emergency contraception (1) suicide nets (1) public health data (1) Proposition 47 (1) news strategy (1) sexual violence (2) Texas (1) new year's resolutions (1) beverage industry (2) Proposition 29 (1) Joe Paterno (1) white house (1) news monitoring (1) Whiteclay (4) cosmetics (1) suicide barrier (2) liana winett (1) public health policy (2) institutional accountability (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) SB 402 (1) sexism (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) community (1) childhood adversity (1) corporate social responsibility (1) FCC (1) built environment (2) sports drinks (1) weight of the nation (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) ACEs (2) Amanda Fallin (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Penn State (3) campaign finance (1) Big Soda (2) cannes lions festival (1) soda (12) HPV vaccine (1) Big Tobacco (3) public health (71) alcohol (5) food deserts (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Happy Meals (1) prison system (1) language (6) sugary drinks (10) abortion (1) food marketing (5) community safety (1) suicide prevention (2) messaging (3) food environment (1) Black Lives Matter (1) equity (3) default frame (1) McDonald's (1) San Francisco (3) Gardasil (1) world water day (1) measure N (2) junk food marketing (4) SB 1000 (1) inequities (1) california (1) social justice (2) Chile (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Twitter (1) Wendy Davis (1) Coca-Cola (3) marketing (1) stigma (1) Oglala Sioux (3) strategic communication (1) government intrusion (1) chronic disease (2) Nickelodeon (1) communication (2) media bites (1) tobacco tax (1) Newtown (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) paula deen (1) cap the tap (1) Telluride (1) nonprofit communications (1) SSBs (1) social math (1) genital warts (1) cigarette advertising (1) tobacco control (2) food industry (4) democracy (1) obesity prevention (1) naacp (1) community violence (1) soda warning labels (1) target marketing (9) food (1) physical activity (1) mental health (2) El Monte (3) Richmond (5) Berkeley (2) American Beverage Association (1) prison phone calls (1) nanny state (2) sanitation (1) Sandy Hook (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) gun violence (1) seat belt laws (1) Bill Cosby (1) PepsiCo (1) soda taxes (2) political correctness (1) child sexual abuse (5) cervical cancer (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) news (2) industry appeals to choice (1) prevention (1) violence prevention (8) collaboration (1) Catholic church (1) breastfeeding (3) advocacy (3) healthy eating (1) tobacco (5) privilege (1) diabetes prevention (1) structural racism (1) media analysis (6) election 2016 (1) snap (1) george lakoff (1) Citizens United (1) Sam Kass (1) water (1) sandusky (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) personal responsibility (3) children's health (3) news analysis (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: