Food marketing to children is not improving rapidly enough, Lori Dorfman tells White House audience

printer friendlyprinter friendly

lori dorfmanMarketing of junk food and sugar-sweetened drinks to children is improving in "baby steps," Lori Dorfman, DrPH, director of PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group, told a White House gathering held by First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Far more needs to be done, and quickly, particularly because aggressive food marketing to children via mobile phones and other digital media is growing explosively, said Dorfman, a national authority on food marketing to kids who has written and spoken extensively on the subject.

"I told them I want to turbo charge movement around marketing to children because we need to move much faster. Researchers say that at the rate we're going, we won't have the right balance of ads on TV until 2033. We can't afford to lose a generation of kids who are forming their ideas about what to eat based on billions of dollars of marketing bombarding them every year," Dorfman said of the event, attended by representatives of food and media companies, advocacy and parents groups, government agencies and research organizations.

Inroads being made in marketing healthier food to kids

Dorfman pointed to some small signs of progress: About 90 percent of the ads Nickelodeon aired in 2005 were for junk food; last year, its junk food ads declined to about 70 percent of ads, Dorfman said. Also, members of a voluntary regulatory body, the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), have made pledges of their own choice to improve nutrients in the products they market to children, but by late 2014 all member companies will adhere to a consistent set of nutrition standards. Although a positive sign, this plan still doesn't cover all the junk food marketing children are exposed to, she said.

Perhaps the White House meeting itself is the biggest harbinger of movement, said Dorfman, who also co-chairs the Food Marketing Workgroup.

"The fact we were there in the White House is a key indicator that this is an issue everyone takes seriously now," said Dorfman.

Digital marketing "gets more eyeballs"

While food companies' spending to push their products on children decreased slightly from about $2 billion in 2006 to $1.8 billion in 2009, this slight decline partly fueled by the recession was offset by a 50 percent increase in digital marketing, which is much less expensive to produce than television ads and "gets more eyeballs for the buck," Dorfman told the gathering.

"A 30-second commercial is here and gone," she said. "If you're pushing a Froot Loop around the screen, you can be doing this for 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes at a time and then sending it to a friend."

chuck e cheeseThe exposure to digital marketing games, contests and promotions is even more intense for children from multicultural and low-income communities they get a "double dose" of marketing through general campaigns for children and others that target African American and Latino children in particular. "They're more receptive and approving of ads than their white peers," Dorfman said. "This might be because if you're an African American kid, you don't see yourself in the media that much; when you do, you're really attentive to it."

For example, Chuck E. Cheese's has used African American children to encourage kids to download an app, visit the restaurant and have a photo taken showing the giant Chuck E. Cheese mouse with his arms around them. This kind of marketing appeals to kids and has a long "shelf" life in their homes.

Broad voluntary regulations needed

Dorfman called for the CFBAI to put regulations in place covering all forms of advertising, including product packaging, sponsorships, and marketing in schools as well as stronger nutrition standards for healthy foods.

"Yes, parents have responsibility for their children, but parents don't have responsibility for putting characters on cereal boxes at kids' eye level on supermarket shelves," she said. "Parents are not responsible for fruits snacks that are not fruit. Parents don't have the power to change that. But the companies do."

Carolyn Newbergh is a writer and editor in the Public Health Institute's communications department.

adverse childhood experiences (3) authentic voices (1) SB-5 (1) public health data (1) McDonald's (1) diabetes prevention (1) soda (12) privilege (1) PepsiCo (1) structural racism (1) obesity (10) marketing (1) junk food marketing (4) Big Food (2) SB 402 (1) cosmetics (1) Catholic church (1) white house (1) campaign finance (1) george lakoff (1) Big Soda (2) gun control (2) children's health (3) personal responsibility (3) Joe Paterno (1) Berkeley (2) gun violence (1) choice (1) prison phone calls (1) food justice (1) Michelle Obama (1) regulation (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) news strategy (1) community organizing (1) communication (2) Aurora (1) Big Tobacco (3) FCC (1) food and beverage marketing (3) filibuster (1) weight of the nation (1) journalism (1) food deserts (1) beauty products (1) news coverage (1) cannes lions festival (1) genital warts (1) framing (14) Dora the Explorer (1) Citizens United (1) election 2016 (1) advocacy (3) childhood adversity (1) Let's Move (1) Newtown (1) Proposition 29 (1) tobacco tax (1) sugary drinks (10) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) social media (2) race (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) ACEs (2) elephant triggers (1) Whiteclay (4) food (1) Amanda Fallin (1) healthy eating (1) obesity prevention (1) soda industry (4) childhood obesity (1) Proposition 47 (1) beverage industry (2) institutional accountability (1) new year's resolutions (1) safety (1) Texas (1) public health policy (2) Coca-Cola (3) inequities (1) auto safety (1) Marion Nestle (1) education (1) communication strategy (1) political correctness (1) prison system (1) cancer prevention (1) snap (1) sandusky (2) news monitoring (1) paper tigers (1) HPV vaccine (1) Telluride (1) target marketing (9) online marketing (1) product safety (1) Connecticut shooting (1) food industry (4) El Monte (3) suicide prevention (2) child sexual abuse (5) reproductive justice (1) front groups (1) Happy Meals (1) emergency contraception (1) Gardasil (1) water (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) democracy (1) social justice (2) media bites (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Rachel Grana (1) soda warning labels (1) apha (3) environmental health (1) abortion (1) cancer research (1) industry appeals to choice (1) prevention (1) Bloomberg (3) world water day (1) language (6) Black Lives Matter (1) SSBs (1) government intrusion (1) SB 1000 (1) media advocacy (23) community (1) naacp (1) messaging (3) breastfeeding (3) suicide barrier (2) measure N (2) nanny state (2) corporate social responsibility (1) Chile (1) diabetes (1) Sandy Hook (2) liana winett (1) news analysis (3) social math (1) cap the tap (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) collaboration (1) digital marketing (3) california (1) Donald Trump (2) stigma (1) women's health (2) Twitter (1) Wendy Davis (1) physical activity (1) nonprofit communications (1) sexism (2) vaccines (1) Measure O (1) values (1) sports drinks (1) sexual health (1) soda taxes (2) sanitation (1) seat belt laws (1) media analysis (6) youth (1) soda tax (11) food access (1) chronic disease (2) social change (1) American Beverage Association (1) alcohol (5) Sam Kass (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) equity (3) racism (1) ssb (1) summer camps (1) indoor smoking ban (1) violence prevention (8) tobacco control (2) Penn State (3) Oglala Sioux (3) Tea Party (1) food marketing (5) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sexual violence (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) gender (1) strategic communication (1) built environment (2) sexual assault (1) community safety (1) Nickelodeon (1) suicide nets (1) food swamps (1) news (2) Colorado (1) community health (1) cervical cancer (1) San Francisco (3) violence (2) water security (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) community violence (1) Bill Cosby (1) media (7) gatorade bolt game (1) Richmond (5) autism (1) public health (71) tobacco industry (2) tobacco (5) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Merck (1) health care (1) health equity (10) paula deen (1) default frame (1) mental health (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) food environment (1) cigarette advertising (1) childhood trauma (3) childhood obestiy conference (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) junk food (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: