Food marketing to children is not improving rapidly enough, Lori Dorfman tells White House audience

printer friendlyprinter friendly

lori dorfmanMarketing of junk food and sugar-sweetened drinks to children is improving in "baby steps," Lori Dorfman, DrPH, director of PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group, told a White House gathering held by First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Far more needs to be done, and quickly, particularly because aggressive food marketing to children via mobile phones and other digital media is growing explosively, said Dorfman, a national authority on food marketing to kids who has written and spoken extensively on the subject.

"I told them I want to turbo charge movement around marketing to children because we need to move much faster. Researchers say that at the rate we're going, we won't have the right balance of ads on TV until 2033. We can't afford to lose a generation of kids who are forming their ideas about what to eat based on billions of dollars of marketing bombarding them every year," Dorfman said of the event, attended by representatives of food and media companies, advocacy and parents groups, government agencies and research organizations.

Inroads being made in marketing healthier food to kids

Dorfman pointed to some small signs of progress: About 90 percent of the ads Nickelodeon aired in 2005 were for junk food; last year, its junk food ads declined to about 70 percent of ads, Dorfman said. Also, members of a voluntary regulatory body, the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), have made pledges of their own choice to improve nutrients in the products they market to children, but by late 2014 all member companies will adhere to a consistent set of nutrition standards. Although a positive sign, this plan still doesn't cover all the junk food marketing children are exposed to, she said.

Perhaps the White House meeting itself is the biggest harbinger of movement, said Dorfman, who also co-chairs the Food Marketing Workgroup.

"The fact we were there in the White House is a key indicator that this is an issue everyone takes seriously now," said Dorfman.

Digital marketing "gets more eyeballs"

While food companies' spending to push their products on children decreased slightly from about $2 billion in 2006 to $1.8 billion in 2009, this slight decline partly fueled by the recession was offset by a 50 percent increase in digital marketing, which is much less expensive to produce than television ads and "gets more eyeballs for the buck," Dorfman told the gathering.

"A 30-second commercial is here and gone," she said. "If you're pushing a Froot Loop around the screen, you can be doing this for 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes at a time and then sending it to a friend."

chuck e cheeseThe exposure to digital marketing games, contests and promotions is even more intense for children from multicultural and low-income communities they get a "double dose" of marketing through general campaigns for children and others that target African American and Latino children in particular. "They're more receptive and approving of ads than their white peers," Dorfman said. "This might be because if you're an African American kid, you don't see yourself in the media that much; when you do, you're really attentive to it."

For example, Chuck E. Cheese's has used African American children to encourage kids to download an app, visit the restaurant and have a photo taken showing the giant Chuck E. Cheese mouse with his arms around them. This kind of marketing appeals to kids and has a long "shelf" life in their homes.

Broad voluntary regulations needed

Dorfman called for the CFBAI to put regulations in place covering all forms of advertising, including product packaging, sponsorships, and marketing in schools as well as stronger nutrition standards for healthy foods.

"Yes, parents have responsibility for their children, but parents don't have responsibility for putting characters on cereal boxes at kids' eye level on supermarket shelves," she said. "Parents are not responsible for fruits snacks that are not fruit. Parents don't have the power to change that. But the companies do."

Carolyn Newbergh is a writer and editor in the Public Health Institute's communications department.


junk food marketing to kids (2) regulation (2) American Beverage Association (1) media (7) social media (2) ssb (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Tea Party (1) Happy Meals (1) world water day (1) Citizens United (1) institutional accountability (1) environmental health (1) race (1) Twitter (1) alcohol (5) sexual health (1) Connecticut shooting (1) youth (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Marion Nestle (1) inequities (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) community health (1) auto safety (1) seat belt laws (1) autism (1) Berkeley (2) chronic disease (2) SB-5 (1) childhood adversity (1) food industry (4) white house (1) Michelle Obama (1) naacp (1) elephant triggers (1) gatorade bolt game (1) SB 402 (1) Let's Move (1) news monitoring (1) cancer research (1) news (2) online marketing (1) McDonald's (1) diabetes (1) Big Tobacco (3) food marketing (5) advocacy (3) messaging (3) Oglala Sioux (3) personal responsibility (3) food swamps (1) health equity (10) violence prevention (8) product safety (1) physical activity (1) safety (1) paper tigers (1) food (1) measure N (2) structural racism (1) social change (1) food deserts (1) education (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) language (6) Rachel Grana (1) community violence (1) apha (3) framing (14) summer camps (1) Amanda Fallin (1) diabetes prevention (1) Aurora (1) ACEs (2) filibuster (1) california (1) Newtown (1) Proposition 47 (1) Big Soda (2) violence (2) water security (1) HPV vaccine (1) cap the tap (1) built environment (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) public health policy (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) PepsiCo (1) prevention (1) healthy eating (1) digital marketing (3) campaign finance (1) tobacco industry (2) tobacco tax (1) Merck (1) suicide barrier (2) cancer prevention (1) industry appeals to choice (1) marketing (1) prison phone calls (1) vaccines (1) cosmetics (1) tobacco control (2) obesity prevention (1) Whiteclay (4) soda tax (11) genital warts (1) cigarette advertising (1) Texas (1) election 2016 (1) soda (12) Colorado (1) collaboration (1) water (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) media advocacy (23) social math (1) abortion (1) Catholic church (1) reproductive justice (1) snap (1) Penn State (3) tobacco (5) soda taxes (2) equity (3) community organizing (1) children's health (3) sexual violence (2) target marketing (9) Proposition 29 (1) obesity (10) government intrusion (1) news strategy (1) stigma (1) community safety (1) Dora the Explorer (1) communication (2) sugary drinks (10) paula deen (1) soda warning labels (1) Nickelodeon (1) weight of the nation (1) nanny state (2) values (1) public health data (1) childhood obesity (1) sandusky (2) food access (1) SB 1000 (1) sanitation (1) San Francisco (3) gun violence (1) women's health (2) Gardasil (1) breastfeeding (3) child sexual abuse (5) Sam Kass (1) El Monte (3) childhood trauma (3) george lakoff (1) news analysis (3) Sandy Hook (2) health care (1) cervical cancer (1) indoor smoking ban (1) FCC (1) front groups (1) new year's resolutions (1) SSBs (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) democracy (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) prison system (1) community (1) media analysis (6) Telluride (1) Bloomberg (3) Measure O (1) strategic communication (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) privilege (1) sports drinks (1) gun control (2) social justice (2) public health (71) mental health (2) emergency contraception (1) Coca-Cola (3) journalism (1) Donald Trump (2) Richmond (5) racism (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Chile (1) sexual assault (1) Wendy Davis (1) communication strategy (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) food environment (1) political correctness (1) news coverage (1) liana winett (1) media bites (1) default frame (1) beauty products (1) authentic voices (1) choice (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) food and beverage marketing (3) junk food (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) junk food marketing (4) gender (1) beverage industry (2) cannes lions festival (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Bill Cosby (1) suicide nets (1) food justice (1) soda industry (4) nonprofit communications (1) sexism (2) Joe Paterno (1) Big Food (2) suicide prevention (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: