Food industry messaging pulled from Big Tobacco playbook

printer friendlyprinter friendly

"Is Big Food the new tobacco?" wondered a group of food and beverage industry executives at a recent New York conference dedicated to addressing legal challenges to their industries. We don't often hear it from industry representatives themselves, but it's not the first time in recent memory a major industry has faced comparisons to the tobacco industry. Debates around estrogenic chemicals in children's products, gun control and climate change, for example, have prompted advocates to argue that chemical companies and the gun lobby, among others, are taking a page from the tobacco industry's playbook, a series of tactics the industry designed to spread misinformation about, undermine regulation of, and thwart litigation against its harmful products.

A cornerstone of the tobacco industry's playbook involved using personal responsibility rhetoric — that is, arguments that shifted the responsibility for tobacco-related health harms solely to those who smoke, rather than the companies that produced and marketed toxic (and deadly) products. At BMSG, we have dedicated several years to exploring when and how the tobacco industry first started using personal responsibility arguments in their public conversations.

Our first study of the issue, an analysis of news, legislative testimony and industry documents from the early 1950s and 60s, found that early tobacco control arguments — including those made on the heels of the 1964 Surgeon General's report that declared smoking a public health problem — were striking for their absence of appeals to personal responsibility. Instead, the tobacco industry used the news primarily to raise doubt about whether or not their products were truly harmful.

Our latest study revealed that it wasn't until 1977 that the tobacco industry started using the news to disseminate personal responsibility messages. Those messages became more and more common in the news over time, eventually becoming the industry's main public argument in the 1980s.

Over the course of the more than two decades of news coverage we studied, the industry refined its messages around individual responsibility to address the political challenges it faced: In the early 1970s, Big Tobacco used arguments that characterized smoking as an issue of personal freedom and, therefore, claimed that any efforts to regulate smoking were a violation of that freedom. By the 1980s, when the industry was facing legal challenges from smokers and their families, Big Tobacco framed smoking as an informed choice that consumers knowingly made — a framing that neatly ignored tobacco addiction. Consequently, the argument held, smokers themselves, not the industry, were responsible for the health consequences of that choice.

Again and again, we've seen Big Food use similar arguments that portray consumers as solely responsible for health harms that result from consuming their products. Food and beverage companies often subtly invoke individual choice and personal responsibility, as the American Beverage Association does with its slogan "Delivering Choices." At other times, industry attempts to deflect blame are more direct. For example, industry representatives often blame consumers for failing to exercise moderation, like the National Restaurant Association did when one of its executives declared, "People who have a weight problem are making bad decisions. Overeating is a choice." More recently, Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent defended his company in the Wall Street Journal, arguing "Americans need to be more active and take greater responsibility for their diets."

So is Big Food the next Big Tobacco? And what do our findings mean for public health and social justice advocates going forward? Much research and scholarship has compared the food industry's tactics to Big Tobacco's playbook. Our work brings the origin and impact of a key element of that playbook into sharper focus and illuminates how the industry strategically adapted its personal responsibility messaging over time. Advocates working on policies that challenge the many industries harming health, from food to guns, should continue to boldly confront this strategy for blocking regulation and insist that the companies themselves exercise some personal responsibility for the products they foist upon the marketplace.


suicide nets (1) Let's Move (1) personal responsibility (3) Colorado (1) Proposition 47 (1) snap (1) vaccines (1) food swamps (1) breastfeeding (3) Big Soda (2) race (1) diabetes (1) food marketing (3) media bites (1) obesity (10) Citizens United (1) junk food marketing (3) Chile (1) structural racism (1) community organizing (1) FCC (1) beauty products (1) Marion Nestle (1) news coverage (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) sandusky (2) health equity (10) San Francisco (3) elephant triggers (1) weight of the nation (1) target marketing (7) campaign finance (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Tea Party (1) news strategy (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) inequities (1) cancer research (1) SB 1000 (1) regulation (2) measure N (2) Proposition 29 (1) institutional accountability (1) Measure O (1) sports drinks (1) social math (1) Bill Cosby (1) junk food (2) community safety (1) stigma (1) cosmetics (1) white house (1) tobacco industry (2) liana winett (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Penn State (3) cervical cancer (1) Merck (1) prevention (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) community health (1) collaboration (1) california (1) Richmond (5) Twitter (1) Telluride (1) education (1) political correctness (1) Connecticut shooting (1) product safety (1) food (1) Newtown (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) framing (14) tobacco control (2) American Beverage Association (1) physical activity (1) public health policy (2) beverage industry (2) seat belt laws (1) childhood trauma (3) violence prevention (8) food deserts (1) Bloomberg (3) Joe Paterno (1) auto safety (1) Berkeley (2) soda tax (11) corporate social responsibility (1) messaging (3) sexism (2) media advocacy (21) language (6) values (1) Coca-Cola (3) Happy Meals (1) cap the tap (1) autism (1) front groups (1) genital warts (1) Catholic church (1) Texas (1) sexual violence (2) news analysis (2) food environment (1) women's health (2) news monitoring (1) social media (2) racism (1) mental health (2) Sam Kass (1) equity (3) social justice (1) filibuster (1) default frame (1) chronic disease (2) reproductive justice (1) Nickelodeon (1) world water day (1) Oglala Sioux (3) gatorade bolt game (1) social change (1) Whiteclay (4) journalism (1) sanitation (1) emergency contraception (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) cigarette advertising (1) new year's resolutions (1) prison system (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Rachel Grana (1) Sandy Hook (2) tobacco (5) HPV vaccine (1) naacp (1) McDonald's (1) soda taxes (2) ssb (1) gun control (2) Big Food (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Big Tobacco (3) SSBs (1) indoor smoking ban (1) childhood obesity (1) youth (1) Wendy Davis (1) diabetes prevention (1) gender (1) food access (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) community violence (1) privilege (1) prison phone calls (1) child sexual abuse (5) choice (1) alcohol (5) summer camps (1) government intrusion (1) media (7) soda warning labels (1) ACEs (2) SB 402 (1) water security (1) soda (12) SB-5 (1) george lakoff (1) nanny state (2) news (2) democracy (1) obesity prevention (1) election 2016 (1) food justice (1) abortion (1) tobacco tax (1) healthy eating (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) communication (2) public health data (1) industry appeals to choice (1) authentic voices (1) Michelle Obama (1) online marketing (1) childhood adversity (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) paula deen (1) gun violence (1) sexual health (1) food and beverage marketing (3) media analysis (5) suicide prevention (2) water (1) suicide barrier (2) food industry (4) PepsiCo (1) digital marketing (2) El Monte (3) paper tigers (1) environmental health (1) public health (66) violence (1) Gardasil (1) sexual assault (1) Aurora (1) advocacy (3) marketing (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) sugary drinks (10) children's health (3) cancer prevention (1) health care (1) Amanda Fallin (1) soda industry (4) Donald Trump (2) apha (2) built environment (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: