Are you reinforcing your opposition's arguments?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

The following is a reposting of a blog written for the brand new Community Commons website, an interactive resource for leaders from communities, philanthropy, and government agencies, as well as private, academic and civic organizations working together on policy, systems and environmental changes for healthier, more equitable communities. BMSG was asked to moderate the Media and Marketing group. Check it out at communitycommons.org.

DON'T think of a pink elephant.

(You're thinking of one right now, aren't you?)

This little exercise refers to UC Berkeley professor George Lakoff's book on the subject of framing in politics, Don't Think of an Elephant, and how we can apply his framing advice in messages designed to promote healthy living policies. (Thanks to Liana Winett, research associate professor in the School of Community Health at Portland State University, for the suggestions and examples below).

Do you ever find yourself bringing up your opposition's frame before she or he does? Have you ever said or heard someone else say something like, "Our healthy living policy goal is NOT nanny state legislation" when nobody else has mentioned the words "nanny" or "state"?

By raising the precise frames we are intending to counter, even if only to refute them, we are creating hurdles we now must jump over. Moreover, we may be suggesting these arguments to those who had not yet considered them.

An actual example from a 2010 Oregonian article about a proposed local healthy vending machine policy: "The governor is not talking about taking away people's french fries. He just wants to offer them the choice of having carrots."

Next time your advocacy group's spokesperson starts a sentence with "this is not about", stop and think: Is this going to reinforce the counter frame?

Other potential pink elephant indicators:

  • "We are not"
  • "We don't intend to ____, rather ____"  
  • "This can be an issue of ____, but ____" 
  • "It is expensive, but ____"

Sometimes we have to counter an opposition's argument, but when we can set the frame, we should use our own words. Can you think of a quote that was meant to counter the opposition's frame but instead inadvertently reinforced it? Share your examples.


food swamps (1) cap the tap (1) government intrusion (1) SB 402 (1) Michelle Obama (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) gun control (2) PepsiCo (1) default frame (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) choice (1) Big Tobacco (3) liana winett (1) summer camps (1) Sandy Hook (2) soda taxes (2) food environment (1) child sexual abuse (5) social justice (2) sexual violence (2) abortion (1) Berkeley (2) public health data (1) Oglala Sioux (3) healthy eating (1) Coca-Cola (3) language (6) Amanda Fallin (1) water security (1) childhood adversity (1) media (7) indoor smoking ban (1) vaccines (1) tobacco industry (2) prison system (1) news analysis (3) gender (1) corporate social responsibility (1) paper tigers (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Nickelodeon (1) health care (1) suicide nets (1) Dora the Explorer (1) violence prevention (8) food marketing (5) diabetes prevention (1) privilege (1) mental health (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) food (1) equity (3) institutional accountability (1) food and beverage marketing (3) regulation (2) social media (2) paula deen (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) cosmetics (1) food access (1) Big Food (2) front groups (1) inequities (1) Texas (1) elephant triggers (1) public health (71) nonprofit communications (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Whiteclay (4) sexism (2) Connecticut shooting (1) Wendy Davis (1) water (1) stigma (1) news coverage (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) food justice (1) cancer prevention (1) soda tax (11) San Francisco (3) soda (12) emergency contraception (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) naacp (1) Rachel Grana (1) race (1) community violence (1) FCC (1) online marketing (1) Joe Paterno (1) diabetes (1) tobacco control (2) values (1) news strategy (1) new year's resolutions (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) world water day (1) california (1) Proposition 47 (1) personal responsibility (3) gatorade bolt game (1) community (1) food deserts (1) Richmond (5) suicide barrier (2) El Monte (3) Citizens United (1) news monitoring (1) public health policy (2) Gardasil (1) violence (2) physical activity (1) education (1) breastfeeding (3) target marketing (9) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) sanitation (1) soda warning labels (1) sexual assault (1) tobacco (5) community organizing (1) political correctness (1) soda industry (4) sugary drinks (10) Happy Meals (1) social change (1) beverage industry (2) childhood trauma (3) product safety (1) junk food marketing (4) journalism (1) obesity (10) ACEs (2) social math (1) digital marketing (3) campaign finance (1) suicide prevention (2) racism (1) Donald Trump (2) seat belt laws (1) auto safety (1) communication strategy (1) junk food (2) food industry (4) election 2016 (1) Aurora (1) youth (1) news (2) nanny state (2) SB 1000 (1) Twitter (1) children's health (3) Penn State (3) built environment (2) prison phone calls (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) beauty products (1) cannes lions festival (1) community safety (1) Telluride (1) cervical cancer (1) SB-5 (1) white house (1) media bites (1) Newtown (1) Marion Nestle (1) chronic disease (2) prevention (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) democracy (1) media advocacy (23) messaging (3) safety (1) authentic voices (1) genital warts (1) media analysis (6) snap (1) Sam Kass (1) community health (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) strategic communication (1) tobacco tax (1) cancer research (1) marketing (1) health equity (10) SSBs (1) ssb (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Bill Cosby (1) Proposition 29 (1) Bloomberg (3) obesity prevention (1) McDonald's (1) HPV vaccine (1) framing (14) women's health (2) Black Lives Matter (1) Let's Move (1) filibuster (1) Chile (1) reproductive justice (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) communication (2) sports drinks (1) Tea Party (1) Catholic church (1) weight of the nation (1) structural racism (1) American Beverage Association (1) Big Soda (2) cigarette advertising (1) environmental health (1) Measure O (1) alcohol (5) george lakoff (1) measure N (2) gun violence (1) autism (1) sandusky (2) apha (3) industry appeals to choice (1) Merck (1) childhood obesity (1) sexual health (1) Colorado (1) collaboration (1) advocacy (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: