ACEs in the headlines: Coverage takes off in 2015

printer friendlyprinter friendly

aces news coverage graphic

Scholars and practitioners have made tremendous strides in making news about the trauma caused by several types of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that lead to damaging physical, mental and social health consequences. But why does this matter? Why should ACEs be in the news?

At Berkeley Media Studies Group (BMSG), we study how the news media characterize health issues. What the public learns about ACEs — apart from personal experience — comes through a filter of what appears in the media. Journalists, in turn, play an important role in setting the agenda for public policy debates by deciding what to report on, and what not to cover. If news coverage doesn't include ACEs and the root causes that foster childhood trauma, it will be harder for policymakers and the public to make connections to policies that can prevent ACEs.

The good news is that we are seeing an increase in coverage about childhood trauma. If the trend continues, we can expect to see about 14 times as much news on ACEs this year than we did a decade ago. The increase in news over the years is important because it means that more people will become familiar with the concept, why it matters, and, if the coverage is thorough, what we can do about it. The jump in the number of stories is a testament to the work of those connected to ACEsTooHigh and ACEsConnection.

However, even with that good news, there is more to do. Public conversations about ACEs are still underrepresented compared to other health issues. For example, there was approximately the same amount of news coverage mentioning child sexual abuse in just 10 days in 2015 (June 22-July 1, 2015) as there was for ACEs in the last 10 years.

Still, BMSG's research indicates that there are many reasons for optimism in ACEs coverage to date. In addition to the growing number of articles, our preliminary data shows that unlike most public health issues, when childhood trauma or ACEs is named in the news, systematic solutions about prevention and intervention are also included.

So what should prevention advocates do? Continue to makes news about childhood trauma through opinion spaces such as op-eds and letters to the editor, so prevention voices can shape the conversation about ACEs and what should be done to prevent and lower the risk of trauma's consequences in communities.

Stay tuned for an upcoming analysis from BMSG that examines how ACEs are portrayed in national, state and online news along with an analysis of how trauma could be covered in business and education news.

This blog originally appeared on ACEs Connection.

 


communication (2) liana winett (1) childhood adversity (1) Oglala Sioux (3) news strategy (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Coca-Cola (3) community safety (1) structural racism (1) SB-5 (1) journalism (1) food marketing (5) naacp (1) cervical cancer (1) Rachel Grana (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) authentic voices (1) advocacy (3) cap the tap (1) McDonald's (1) breastfeeding (3) racism (1) prison phone calls (1) Chile (1) snap (1) childhood trauma (3) sanitation (1) SB 402 (1) food (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) cannes lions festival (1) media advocacy (23) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Berkeley (2) abortion (1) soda taxes (2) education (1) default frame (1) Big Soda (2) cancer prevention (1) ssb (1) suicide barrier (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) ACEs (2) communication strategy (1) physical activity (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) built environment (2) SSBs (1) elephant triggers (1) online marketing (1) autism (1) Sam Kass (1) youth (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) prevention (1) Connecticut shooting (1) diabetes prevention (1) food and beverage marketing (3) news monitoring (1) Gardasil (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) california (1) tobacco (5) sports drinks (1) children's health (3) reproductive justice (1) Michelle Obama (1) community organizing (1) Nickelodeon (1) media (7) messaging (3) nanny state (2) cigarette advertising (1) Dora the Explorer (1) news (2) language (6) emergency contraception (1) Twitter (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) water security (1) Whiteclay (4) social media (2) suicide prevention (2) environmental health (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) apha (3) soda warning labels (1) gatorade bolt game (1) women's health (2) institutional accountability (1) measure N (2) sandusky (2) health equity (10) election 2016 (1) soda industry (4) gun control (2) Citizens United (1) soda tax (11) weight of the nation (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) george lakoff (1) media analysis (6) equity (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) genital warts (1) sexism (2) inequities (1) Newtown (1) social math (1) news analysis (3) framing (14) HPV vaccine (1) Marion Nestle (1) tobacco control (2) Bloomberg (3) marketing (1) sexual health (1) violence (2) Proposition 29 (1) Big Food (2) auto safety (1) suicide nets (1) Proposition 47 (1) Texas (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Sandy Hook (2) public health data (1) community violence (1) government intrusion (1) gender (1) Donald Trump (2) healthy eating (1) beverage industry (2) nonprofit communications (1) political correctness (1) food justice (1) sexual assault (1) collaboration (1) obesity (10) target marketing (9) social change (1) privilege (1) campaign finance (1) public health (71) junk food marketing to kids (2) Richmond (5) child sexual abuse (5) world water day (1) alcohol (5) new year's resolutions (1) choice (1) obesity prevention (1) Penn State (3) chronic disease (2) community (1) beauty products (1) values (1) strategic communication (1) junk food (2) Measure O (1) regulation (2) PepsiCo (1) gun violence (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) cancer research (1) seat belt laws (1) sugary drinks (10) cosmetics (1) digital marketing (3) water (1) media bites (1) soda (12) health care (1) prison system (1) product safety (1) Let's Move (1) industry appeals to choice (1) paula deen (1) Happy Meals (1) stigma (1) food deserts (1) Aurora (1) food swamps (1) summer camps (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Tea Party (1) democracy (1) FCC (1) paper tigers (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Catholic church (1) filibuster (1) tobacco tax (1) race (1) Merck (1) food industry (4) white house (1) diabetes (1) front groups (1) Colorado (1) personal responsibility (3) childhood obesity (1) El Monte (3) food environment (1) violence prevention (8) tobacco industry (2) news coverage (1) community health (1) mental health (2) Telluride (1) food access (1) Wendy Davis (1) SB 1000 (1) social justice (2) vaccines (1) Joe Paterno (1) Bill Cosby (1) Big Tobacco (3) American Beverage Association (1) sexual violence (2) corporate social responsibility (1) safety (1) public health policy (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) San Francisco (3) junk food marketing (4)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: