ACEs in the headlines: Coverage takes off in 2015

printer friendlyprinter friendly

aces news coverage graphic

Scholars and practitioners have made tremendous strides in making news about the trauma caused by several types of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that lead to damaging physical, mental and social health consequences. But why does this matter? Why should ACEs be in the news?

At Berkeley Media Studies Group (BMSG), we study how the news media characterize health issues. What the public learns about ACEs — apart from personal experience — comes through a filter of what appears in the media. Journalists, in turn, play an important role in setting the agenda for public policy debates by deciding what to report on, and what not to cover. If news coverage doesn't include ACEs and the root causes that foster childhood trauma, it will be harder for policymakers and the public to make connections to policies that can prevent ACEs.

The good news is that we are seeing an increase in coverage about childhood trauma. If the trend continues, we can expect to see about 14 times as much news on ACEs this year than we did a decade ago. The increase in news over the years is important because it means that more people will become familiar with the concept, why it matters, and, if the coverage is thorough, what we can do about it. The jump in the number of stories is a testament to the work of those connected to ACEsTooHigh and ACEsConnection.

However, even with that good news, there is more to do. Public conversations about ACEs are still underrepresented compared to other health issues. For example, there was approximately the same amount of news coverage mentioning child sexual abuse in just 10 days in 2015 (June 22-July 1, 2015) as there was for ACEs in the last 10 years.

Still, BMSG's research indicates that there are many reasons for optimism in ACEs coverage to date. In addition to the growing number of articles, our preliminary data shows that unlike most public health issues, when childhood trauma or ACEs is named in the news, systematic solutions about prevention and intervention are also included.

So what should prevention advocates do? Continue to makes news about childhood trauma through opinion spaces such as op-eds and letters to the editor, so prevention voices can shape the conversation about ACEs and what should be done to prevent and lower the risk of trauma's consequences in communities.

Stay tuned for an upcoming analysis from BMSG that examines how ACEs are portrayed in national, state and online news along with an analysis of how trauma could be covered in business and education news.

This blog originally appeared on ACEs Connection.

 


target marketing (9) childhood trauma (3) reproductive justice (1) sandusky (2) world water day (1) framing (14) snap (1) Citizens United (1) media (7) women's health (2) obesity (10) social change (1) democracy (1) genital warts (1) tobacco control (2) sexual health (1) media analysis (6) public health (71) environmental health (1) prison phone calls (1) stigma (1) Aurora (1) communication strategy (1) strategic communication (1) political correctness (1) safety (1) gun control (2) suicide prevention (2) health care (1) inequities (1) breastfeeding (3) tobacco (5) public health policy (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) Whiteclay (4) alcohol (5) Sandy Hook (2) community violence (1) vaccines (1) sugary drinks (10) childhood obestiy conference (1) Coca-Cola (3) summer camps (1) media advocacy (23) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) beauty products (1) Nickelodeon (1) election 2016 (1) suicide barrier (2) soda warning labels (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) built environment (2) Proposition 29 (1) childhood obesity (1) suicide nets (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) cosmetics (1) news coverage (1) violence (2) Bloomberg (3) social justice (2) Penn State (3) nonprofit communications (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Texas (1) personal responsibility (3) news monitoring (1) beverage industry (2) communication (2) Chile (1) marketing (1) regulation (2) San Francisco (3) government intrusion (1) violence prevention (8) Tea Party (1) sexual violence (2) seat belt laws (1) elephant triggers (1) Gardasil (1) Wendy Davis (1) Twitter (1) physical activity (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) journalism (1) choice (1) PepsiCo (1) cervical cancer (1) food industry (4) Telluride (1) Black Lives Matter (1) community organizing (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) HPV vaccine (1) filibuster (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) diabetes prevention (1) campaign finance (1) healthy eating (1) food (1) children's health (3) American Beverage Association (1) food access (1) liana winett (1) Big Tobacco (3) collaboration (1) Big Food (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food and beverage marketing (3) community health (1) paper tigers (1) white house (1) news analysis (3) language (6) indoor smoking ban (1) messaging (3) Bill Cosby (1) corporate social responsibility (1) tobacco tax (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) cannes lions festival (1) cigarette advertising (1) privilege (1) food justice (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Merck (1) product safety (1) advocacy (3) cancer prevention (1) news (2) Newtown (1) sports drinks (1) soda (12) auto safety (1) news strategy (1) measure N (2) junk food marketing (4) childhood lead poisoning (1) weight of the nation (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) authentic voices (1) health equity (10) ssb (1) education (1) Big Soda (2) water (1) george lakoff (1) front groups (1) FCC (1) food environment (1) community (1) SB 1000 (1) Proposition 47 (1) community safety (1) Sam Kass (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Catholic church (1) Colorado (1) public health data (1) junk food (2) Marion Nestle (1) apha (3) paula deen (1) gatorade bolt game (1) gender (1) childhood adversity (1) soda industry (4) Michelle Obama (1) abortion (1) naacp (1) Donald Trump (2) water security (1) El Monte (3) prevention (1) chronic disease (2) new year's resolutions (1) online marketing (1) food marketing (5) Berkeley (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) soda taxes (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) Joe Paterno (1) SB 402 (1) nanny state (2) california (1) child sexual abuse (5) Richmond (5) autism (1) SB-5 (1) structural racism (1) food deserts (1) Oglala Sioux (3) social media (2) equity (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) ACEs (2) values (1) default frame (1) prison system (1) obesity prevention (1) food swamps (1) race (1) diabetes (1) digital marketing (3) Rachel Grana (1) institutional accountability (1) Let's Move (1) sexual assault (1) mental health (2) Measure O (1) soda tax (11) media bites (1) McDonald's (1) youth (1) Happy Meals (1) sexism (2) emergency contraception (1) social math (1) sanitation (1) gun violence (1) tobacco industry (2) industry appeals to choice (1) SSBs (1) cap the tap (1) racism (1) cancer research (1) Dora the Explorer (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: