ACEs in the headlines: Coverage takes off in 2015

printer friendlyprinter friendly

aces news coverage graphic

Scholars and practitioners have made tremendous strides in making news about the trauma caused by several types of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that lead to damaging physical, mental and social health consequences. But why does this matter? Why should ACEs be in the news?

At Berkeley Media Studies Group (BMSG), we study how the news media characterize health issues. What the public learns about ACEs — apart from personal experience — comes through a filter of what appears in the media. Journalists, in turn, play an important role in setting the agenda for public policy debates by deciding what to report on, and what not to cover. If news coverage doesn't include ACEs and the root causes that foster childhood trauma, it will be harder for policymakers and the public to make connections to policies that can prevent ACEs.

The good news is that we are seeing an increase in coverage about childhood trauma. If the trend continues, we can expect to see about 14 times as much news on ACEs this year than we did a decade ago. The increase in news over the years is important because it means that more people will become familiar with the concept, why it matters, and, if the coverage is thorough, what we can do about it. The jump in the number of stories is a testament to the work of those connected to ACEsTooHigh and ACEsConnection.

However, even with that good news, there is more to do. Public conversations about ACEs are still underrepresented compared to other health issues. For example, there was approximately the same amount of news coverage mentioning child sexual abuse in just 10 days in 2015 (June 22-July 1, 2015) as there was for ACEs in the last 10 years.

Still, BMSG's research indicates that there are many reasons for optimism in ACEs coverage to date. In addition to the growing number of articles, our preliminary data shows that unlike most public health issues, when childhood trauma or ACEs is named in the news, systematic solutions about prevention and intervention are also included.

So what should prevention advocates do? Continue to makes news about childhood trauma through opinion spaces such as op-eds and letters to the editor, so prevention voices can shape the conversation about ACEs and what should be done to prevent and lower the risk of trauma's consequences in communities.

Stay tuned for an upcoming analysis from BMSG that examines how ACEs are portrayed in national, state and online news along with an analysis of how trauma could be covered in business and education news.

This blog originally appeared on ACEs Connection.

 


authentic voices (1) cap the tap (1) food environment (1) community organizing (1) emergency contraception (1) race (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) tobacco (5) equity (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) cosmetics (1) education (1) corporate social responsibility (1) diabetes prevention (1) inequities (1) language (6) election 2016 (1) childhood trauma (3) social justice (2) suicide prevention (2) soda taxes (2) water security (1) prevention (1) soda industry (4) community violence (1) world water day (1) sexual assault (1) food marketing (5) Rachel Grana (1) obesity (10) reproductive justice (1) SB 1000 (1) soda tax (11) measure N (2) sexual violence (2) community safety (1) Nickelodeon (1) public health data (1) children's health (3) social change (1) liana winett (1) PepsiCo (1) Merck (1) obesity prevention (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) political correctness (1) sexual health (1) safety (1) healthy eating (1) youth (1) gun violence (1) SSBs (1) SB 402 (1) collaboration (1) media advocacy (23) Texas (1) democracy (1) community (1) food swamps (1) structural racism (1) campaign finance (1) beverage industry (2) Big Food (2) women's health (2) tobacco tax (1) Measure O (1) Bloomberg (3) snap (1) news monitoring (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) messaging (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) abortion (1) Telluride (1) gender (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Proposition 47 (1) HPV vaccine (1) ssb (1) physical activity (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) sanitation (1) diabetes (1) Citizens United (1) cancer research (1) media analysis (6) target marketing (9) Black Lives Matter (1) naacp (1) Marion Nestle (1) industry appeals to choice (1) seat belt laws (1) Penn State (3) food access (1) child sexual abuse (5) Gardasil (1) privilege (1) Chile (1) white house (1) Catholic church (1) soda warning labels (1) genital warts (1) Amanda Fallin (1) choice (1) journalism (1) elephant triggers (1) food justice (1) product safety (1) violence prevention (8) nanny state (2) chronic disease (2) mental health (2) Berkeley (2) SB-5 (1) summer camps (1) marketing (1) media (7) childhood adversity (1) weight of the nation (1) Sam Kass (1) Big Soda (2) front groups (1) indoor smoking ban (1) food industry (4) Jerry Sandusky (3) Twitter (1) cancer prevention (1) junk food (2) community health (1) news strategy (1) El Monte (3) Newtown (1) environmental health (1) health care (1) new year's resolutions (1) default frame (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) values (1) regulation (2) racism (1) violence (2) sandusky (2) Happy Meals (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) prison phone calls (1) public health (71) communication (2) suicide nets (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) advocacy (3) cannes lions festival (1) cigarette advertising (1) news (2) public health policy (2) Coca-Cola (3) media bites (1) American Beverage Association (1) social math (1) george lakoff (1) food and beverage marketing (3) beauty products (1) sexism (2) San Francisco (3) health equity (10) Sandy Hook (2) filibuster (1) Bill Cosby (1) alcohol (5) food deserts (1) Oglala Sioux (3) sugary drinks (10) Oakland Unified School District (1) stigma (1) apha (3) Aurora (1) news analysis (3) cervical cancer (1) Proposition 29 (1) personal responsibility (3) institutional accountability (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) vaccines (1) soda (12) breastfeeding (3) paper tigers (1) food (1) strategic communication (1) nonprofit communications (1) Donald Trump (2) Whiteclay (4) autism (1) california (1) Wendy Davis (1) gun control (2) Tea Party (1) McDonald's (1) Joe Paterno (1) FCC (1) Colorado (1) Let's Move (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Richmond (5) Johnson & Johnson (1) built environment (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) paula deen (1) childhood obesity (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) prison system (1) tobacco industry (2) news coverage (1) gatorade bolt game (1) government intrusion (1) Connecticut shooting (1) social media (2) online marketing (1) Michelle Obama (1) communication strategy (1) ACEs (2) framing (14) tobacco control (2) junk food marketing (4) water (1) suicide barrier (2) sports drinks (1) digital marketing (3) auto safety (1) Big Tobacco (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: